Skip to comments.
ESPN's Weissman: Despite Exoneration 'The Questions Remain' About Duke Lacrosse Players
NewsBusters ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 05/30/2010 10:42:12 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 next last
To: Guenevere
Golden boy syndrome, ma'am. Clinton suffered from it, as does Obamy.
Those whom 'evil' may not be spoken about, even when it should. The syndrome (sort of like Stockholm Syndrome, imo):
IOW, you are a Laz fan-girl. More power to you. But see it for what it is.
101
posted on
05/30/2010 3:27:45 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: governsleastgovernsbest
What’s wrong with his head? and I mean its physical appearance.
To: Larry Lucido
Pre-post tribulationist, post-preterist, post-toasties, pre-postal semi-pelican brief amillenialist I am strictly post nasal.
103
posted on
05/30/2010 5:24:33 PM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
To: bvw
Morals are delicious.
But a little sex is very moral.
So there.
104
posted on
05/30/2010 6:50:21 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: FreedomPoster
Well put, Laz!When it comes to sex, I ALWAYS put it PERFECTLY.
nnnNNNNGGGGeeeesssh.
105
posted on
05/30/2010 6:51:20 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: Guenevere; onyx
YOU are SO SWEET, and I just bet you keep your husband smiling from ear to ear.
Gosh darn it, you are my fave. Well, except for onyx, who I'm marrying soon.
106
posted on
05/30/2010 6:52:43 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: Lazamataz
Delicious, Laz? On toast? With ‘condom-nents’ on the side? Hmmmmmm?
107
posted on
05/30/2010 6:53:40 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
To: Yardstick
Well, I think a lot of questions remain about Weissmans wife beating.
And he has never denied the reports about his pedophile relationships.
108
posted on
05/30/2010 6:58:31 PM PDT
by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media.)
To: combat_boots; Xenalyte; bvw
Delicious, Laz? On toast? With condom-nents on the side? Hmmmmmm?Delicious, but only with the following inventory:
- 33 helium baloons.
- A medium cucumber.
- Vasoline.
- 3 square feet of netting.
- 7 mature chimpanzees.
- A mime.
- 2 clown noses.
- A plastic floormat.
- Stripper high heels.
- 3 jars of orange marmalade.
- 17 feet of rope.
- Disinfectant.
- 109 midgets, various sexes.
- A wheelbarrow. John Deere brand is the most durable.
- A funnel WITH attaching hose.
- 3 lava lamps.
- A recording of the Chimpunks Christmas Special.
- A chandiellier.
- Peanut oil.
- A Groucho Marx mask.
- A clipboard with graph paper.
- 18 radishes.
109
posted on
05/30/2010 7:00:28 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: onyx
Hey, fiance: Are you up for the above?
110
posted on
05/30/2010 7:01:10 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: Lazamataz
18 radishes
Radishes? You’ve just made me think of that scene from “Wasabi” when the guy puts the whole fingerful of wasabi in his mouth.
Radishes! They’re not just for breakfast anymore.
111
posted on
05/30/2010 7:05:57 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
To: combat_boots
With all the stuff I posted, you got hung up on RADISHES???!?
"108 midgets, various sexes. Okay. RADISHES? O, HELL no! That's KINKY!"
You are my kind of gal.
112
posted on
05/30/2010 7:12:19 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: bvw
Then try to make stripping illegal. All I pointed out is that you said they broke a law, and then in the following clause said that even if it is not a law.
I didnt argue any of the other points, kiddo. I just pointed out that you encourage arresting someone who for breaking a law that didnt exist.
113
posted on
05/30/2010 7:24:10 PM PDT
by
Raider Sam
(They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
To: Lazamataz
114
posted on
05/30/2010 7:27:59 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: Raider Sam
Kiddo, in saner times and still in saner places stripping is illegal. And it should be illegal around any college town.
That is if you want to raise a non-broken generation. Let’s ask Laz, eh?
How many kids have you raised, Laz?
What’s your recipe for raising children?
115
posted on
05/30/2010 7:43:29 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: bigredkitty1
Got that off your chest, now, Lady?
Just wondering, how many sons or brothers do you have?
116
posted on
05/30/2010 7:52:26 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: bvw
"While the crime they were charged with was false, what they did was also a crime, and if not currently on the books it should be." Could you share your evidence with us, please. From what I recall they hired two women to perform as strippers. Not exactly something to warm a parent's heart, but not a crime. And as long as we have a first amendment it should not be. Immoral, perhaps; but not illegal.
Unless you have some evidence that the MSM overlooked in their persecut, I mean investigation.
117
posted on
05/30/2010 8:04:53 PM PDT
by
In Maryland
("Impromptu Obamanomics is getting scarier by the day ..." - Caroline Baum)
To: Lazamataz
118
posted on
05/30/2010 8:32:30 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
To: In Maryland
The First Amendment existed to protect POLITICAL speech — words, first and foremost. In origin it did not mean to protect “arts” such as dancing, nor would most Founders have ever agreed that it protected lewdness.
119
posted on
05/30/2010 8:56:35 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: bvw
The First Amendment existed to protect POLITICAL speech words, first and foremost. In origin it did not mean to protect "arts" such as dancing, nor would most Founders have ever agreed that it protected lewdness.
James Madison on the First Amendment and licentiousness of the press:
Is, then, the Federal Government, it will be asked, destitute of every authority for restraining the licentiousness of the press, and for shielding itself against the libellous attacks which may be made on those who administer it?
The Constitution alone can answer this question. If no such power be expressly delegated, and if it be not both necessary and proper to carry into execution an express power--above all, if it be expressly forbidden, by a declaratory amendment to the Constitution--the answer must be, that the Federal Government is destitute of all such authority.
James Madison, Report on the Virginia Resolutions
Jan. 1800 Writings 6:385--401
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendI_speechs24.html
______________________________________
LICEN''TIOUSNESS, n. Excessive indulgence of liberty; contempt of the just restraints of law, morality and decorum.
http://machaut.uchicago.edu/?resource=Webster%27s&word=licentiousness&use1828=on (Webster's 1828 edition)
120
posted on
05/30/2010 11:14:32 PM PDT
by
Ken H
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson