Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the 'T' in GLBT? (Is the distinction between male and female worth fighting for?)
National Review ^ | 06/01/2010 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 06/02/2010 6:59:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Most Americans are aware that gay activism rarely presents itself as a movement solely for the rights of gays. For example, the most common acronym for the gay-rights movement is “GLBT,” meaning “gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender.”

Interestingly, few people ever ask about the “T.” What do the transgendered have to do with gays? How and why are they connected by activists, gay and straight, on the left? Strictly speaking, gays have no more in common with transgendered people than straights do.

To understand the answer is to understand much of what animates the sexual Left.

The aim of the GLBT movement is not merely to halt society’s persecution of gays and encourage the acceptance of homosexuals as equal fellow citizens. If it were, the movement could disband. The battle for acceptance of gay people has largely been won. And deservedly so: The persecution of people for being sexually attracted to members of the same sex has been as morally wrong as it has been consistent. I am among the majority of Americans, and presumably non-Americans, who still hold to the male-female sexual ideal and who seek to retain the man-woman definition of marriage. But I fully recognize there have always been individuals who are no more capable of sexual attraction to the opposite sex than men like me are capable of being sexually aroused by the same sex. They should not be ridiculed, let alone persecuted, for their sexual orientation.

And few people, conservative or liberal, have any trouble accepting a transsexual, i.e., someone who has surgically changed his or her sex.

But what does any of this have to do with the transgendered, i.e., people who do not psychologically identify with their biological sex, who act as if they were a member of the opposite sex, and who have not changed their biology? Why does the Left include the transgendered in its activism on behalf of gays?

The latest example occurred this month in New York State when Attorney General Andrew Cuomo forced American Eagle Outfitters to rescind its employee dress code. This code included a ban on male employees’ wearing dresses or other women’s clothing and a ban on women employees’ dressing as men.

To the Left, this is just another example of fighting discrimination — how dare society ask men who prefer to wear women’s clothing not to do so at work? As New York Times columnist Frank Rich recently wrote with regard to changing the definition of marriage to include couples of the same sex, Americans regard all this with a “shrug.”

Likewise last year, the civil-rights commission of the state of Maine declared that no Maine school should insist that biological males use only men’s bathrooms. From elementary school on, every student in Maine should be allowed to determine if he feels male or female, and enter whichever bathroom matches this self-definition.

The Maine commission also called for a ban on schools’ enforcing gender divisions in sports teams, school organizations, and locker rooms. It says forcing a student into a particular room or group because of his or her biological gender amounts to discrimination.

On the Left, few, if any, changes in the sexual arena are worthy of more than a shrug. Man-made carbon-dioxide emissions are worth changing the world’s economy over. But redefining marriage from male-female to same-sex, forcing companies to retain male employees who cross-dress at work, and ending gender-specific teams and bathrooms in schools — these are hardly worth a shrug.

But the gender-definition of marriage and the transgender issue are actually very big deals.

In his just-published book, How Pleasure Works, Yale psychology professor Paul Bloom, described by Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker, as “among the deepest thinkers and clearest writers on the science of mind today,” writes:

Freud claimed "when you meet a human being, the first distinction you make is 'male or female' and you are accustomed to making the distinction with unhesitating certainty." This is true for me at least; I get e-mails from strangers with foreign names and when I can't tell whether the sender is a man or a woman, it is oddly unsettling. It shouldn’t matter — I have no intention of mating with them — but it does. When we see a baby in a diaper, the first question that many of us ask is: Is this a boy or it is a girl?

So, why the T in GLBT?

Because the Left seeks to obliterate the distinction between men and women. They consider this distinction to be a social construct. That is why, to this day, despite all the scientific evidence (as if that were needed) proving how different male and female brains are, many left-wing academics still argue that boys play with trucks rather than with dolls because of sexist socialization.

And that is why, on the left, changing the definition of marriage is only worth a shrug. Since there are no inherent differences between men and women, what difference could it possibly make whether a man marries a man or a woman? Or if children have two fathers, two mothers, or a father and a mother?

For those of us who believe that the male-female distinction is vital to civilization, the Left’s attempts to erase this distinction are worth fighting against. For those who see no purpose in maintaining this distinction, its demise is worth no more than a shrug.

— Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist. He may be contacted through his website, dennisprager.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: gay; homosexuality; lesbian; transgender

1 posted on 06/02/2010 6:59:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

GLBT because it covers all aspects of homosexual deviancy.


2 posted on 06/02/2010 7:03:26 AM PDT by TSgt (We will always be prepared, so we may always be free. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Are they going to let cross-dressers into the Army now? That will serve for troop cohesion.

Politically Correct nonsense.


3 posted on 06/02/2010 7:07:08 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I love Mr. Prager...he is one of the great thinkers of our time. But he's wrong.

The reason the T is in there is because as they started to come out, transpersons were only really accepted in gay bars and dance clubs. This was due to there already being a Drag Queen culture in gay groups: transpersons were able to hang out there unmolested.

There's actually a surprising divide between gays and trans, today. The two groups tolerate each other more than anything else.

4 posted on 06/02/2010 7:11:02 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (FREE ARIZONA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
TRANNY Pictures, Images and Photos
5 posted on 06/02/2010 7:16:24 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here is Barry’s Tweet for today: BarackObama
As we recognize the immeasurable contributions of LGBT Americans during Pride Month, we renew our commitment to equal rights for all.


6 posted on 06/02/2010 7:29:17 AM PDT by crymeariver (Good news...in a way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

Is the acronym “GLBT” pronounced the same as “giblet”?

;^)


7 posted on 06/02/2010 8:00:32 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If homosexuals are attracted to “Same”, why do they partner up with former members of the same sex who’ve adapted their physique to resemble to OPPOSITE gender?


8 posted on 06/02/2010 8:27:10 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

GBLT - Gravy Bacon Lettuce Tomato


9 posted on 06/02/2010 8:27:35 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Inside 20 years. Children and Animals will be included. I just don’t know which will come first.


10 posted on 06/02/2010 8:44:55 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus
I think Pink berets are in order....

Then they can recognize each other...and in turn....lol

11 posted on 06/02/2010 8:52:47 AM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson