Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Today Let's Discuss the "Two State Solution"
JINSA ^ | June 2, 2010 | JINSA Report #993

Posted on 06/02/2010 1:32:32 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah

This may not seem like the best time to open a discussion of the "two state solution," but it may well be the best time to call the Palestinians', and the world's, bluff and put the necessary discussion of Gaza and the future of the blockade on a more serious and realistic footing.

Point 1: Fatah on the West Bank has no desire to be responsible for Gaza, no ability to wrest control of Gaza from Hamas, and no ability to administer the West Bank if Hamas is freed from its Gaza prison. Despite the posturing, Gaza blockaded by Israel and Egypt suits Abu Mazen and Fatah more than it does anyone else. For now, none of the three governing bodies between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River will disappear.

Point 2: The West Bank has more in common tribally, economically and culturally with Israel's Arab population in the Galilee and the Palestinian population of Jordan than it does with Gaza Palestinians. It is unsurprising that the brief but bloody Palestinian civil war in 2007 resulted in Hamas, an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood that began in Egypt, expelling Fatah from Gaza. Since then, Fatah has been building a security force on the West Bank with the assistance of the U.S. military under Lt. Gen. Keith Dayton.

Readers know JINSA's objection to the force, but it always puzzled us why the Israeli government insisted that it appreciated Lt. Gen. Dayton's work and liked the Palestinian "police force" even as it morphed into something closer to an army. And even as senior IDF officials complained that the grave risk Israel had undertaken by supporting the force was unappreciated by the United States (and, perhaps, by JINSA).

Maybe that's because they didn't explain themselves clearly.

The arrangement, begun under the Olmert government and carried on by Prime Minister Netanyahu, appears to be that Israel would remove some security checkpoints, encourage economic advancement and allow the Palestinian police to arrest pretty much whichever Palestinians it wanted, criminals and the insufficiently enthusiastic as well as Hamas members. In exchange, Fatah would discourage attacks on Israelis both in the West Bank and in Israel proper and allow Israel to arrest pretty much any Hamas member necessary. It worked. The West Bank experienced strong economic growth in 2009 (almost 8%, compared to the U.S. recession) and Israel experienced relatively little in the way of terrorism, or even car theft, emanating from the West Bank and had plenty of tourism and investment. Abu Mazen canceled the Palestinian elections, but no one seems to have noticed or cared.

In combination, Israel and Fatah control everything from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River-except Gaza. Their combined impact perhaps is even paving the way for new relations with Jordan.[1] It was a great deal for Fatah and not bad for Israel, but the arrangement has been severely undermined by the Obama Administration which has been pushing for a unified Hamas and Fatah and demanding an immediate "two state solution" without seeming to notice or care that no one wants Gaza.

Neither the Israelis nor Abbas could actually explain the problem to American officials. So Prime Minister Netanyahu said the magic words, "two state solution," but added caveats which, although quite reasonable, were sure to break down the process. Abbas pulled out of direct talks, tried to gin up demonstrations on the West Bank (it didn't work, the local population doesn't have much stomach for another intifada), demanded a settlement freeze and announced that he is not negotiating with Israel, but only with the United States.

Each, in his own way, has signaled that neither Israel nor Fatah has any intention of letting Gaza back in the game.

Now, let's talk about why Gaza is blockaded as a threat to Israel, to Egypt and to Fatah on the West Bank. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

[1]YNet News reported that when Taher al-Masri, head of the Jordanian Senate, spoke before an audience that included the royal family and King Abdullah II, he talked about "the two united banks, with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan emerging on both banks of the holy river." It is unlikely that he was planning to wage war to regain the West Bank, illegally occupied from 1948-67 by Jordan, but JINSA has long thought an economic and security "condominium" in which the West Bank is "owner occupied space" within Israel and Jordan would benefit everyone - particularly the Palestinians.

Archive of past JINSA Reports
Email: info@jinsa.org


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: gaza; israel; jordan; palestinians; westbank

1 posted on 06/02/2010 1:32:33 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

And the Lord spake unto Moses, ... saying,
Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye are passed over Jordan into the land of Canaan;
Then ye shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places:
... But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.

— Numbers 33: 50–52,

And so it is written.


2 posted on 06/02/2010 1:36:15 PM PDT by BobinIL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
The Palestinians were already given their own state. It's called Jordan.
3 posted on 06/02/2010 2:06:59 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Should had read closer I thought this was about a two state solution here in the U.S.


4 posted on 06/02/2010 2:14:23 PM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Yep..that is the truth...but Jordon doesn’t want them any more..they are too radical and cause great disruption and killings in Jordon..so Jordon kicks them out when they do get there.


5 posted on 06/02/2010 2:16:45 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Yep..that is the truth...but Jordon doesn’t want them any more..they are too radical and cause great disruption and killings in Jordon..so Jordon kicks them out when they do get there.


6 posted on 06/02/2010 2:17:04 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: caww

Then they should be the founders of one HELL of a state.


7 posted on 06/02/2010 2:25:15 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

“The Palestinians were already given their own state. It’s called Jordan. “

You could transport those folks to another dimension with a fresh pristine non human occupied earth and they would still want more.


8 posted on 06/02/2010 2:29:51 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Two state ,other than the Israel and Jordon that is already, just will never work..they may attempt it but the mindset of Palestinians will never accept for long, nor will they be able to keep their people in line if it gets established...Israel dead or thrown in the sea is their cause and their beliefs. No other government leader will dictate their beliefs no matter two state, five or twenty...it just doesn’t matter to them..they are on their own wavelength frequency..and that’s a death cult mentality.


9 posted on 06/02/2010 2:32:49 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Nachum

PING


10 posted on 06/02/2010 3:10:42 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson