Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News 'Forbes on Fox' Panel: Detonate Nukes in Gulf to Stop Oil Spill
Newsbusters ^ | June 6, 2010 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 06/05/2010 9:38:26 PM PDT by Rufus2007

How's this for outside-the-box thinking - use nuclear explosives to stop the BP oil spill that is ravaging the Gulf Coast?

According to some of the panelist on Fox News Channel's "Forbes on Fox," using nuclear materials would be a more expeditious way to solve this calamity.

"That's right, nuke it." "Forbes on Fox" host David Asman said on the show's June 5 broadcast. "Some scientists do advocate this. The Soviets apparently succeeded in doing it. Here is the video they say actually shows it. And now some at ‘Forbes' agree, nuke it.

...more (w/video)...

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: foxnews; nuclear; oilspill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
So - if Obama takes over, will this be an option?
1 posted on 06/05/2010 9:38:26 PM PDT by Rufus2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Idiots. THey are already worried about the seabed collapsing and releasing even more oil because of the pressures caving this in (normal pumping replaces oil with mud/water so seafloor collapse won’t occur).

Nuke it and watch the whole ocean floor open up. They were already worried about leaks opening just a couple miles away.


2 posted on 06/05/2010 9:41:20 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Let’s leave the nuke option for our enemies.


3 posted on 06/05/2010 9:46:20 PM PDT by umgud (Obama is a failed experiment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

“They were already worried about leaks opening just a couple miles away.”

I really don’t think we need to worry that much. The environmentalists and Dimocratz have assured us that there isn’t much oil near the U.S. so how much more can come up? s/off


4 posted on 06/05/2010 9:46:26 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

5 posted on 06/05/2010 9:46:27 PM PDT by ROTB (Without a Christian revival, we are government slaves, or nuked by China/Russia during armed revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

As about as stupit as it gets


6 posted on 06/05/2010 9:46:37 PM PDT by tophat9000 (It ain't about Black... It ain't about White...It's about a Red...Trying to take our rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

If they could get a nuke down the hole as the Russians did, they could have already plugged this other ways. Detonating it on the ocean floor is insane.


7 posted on 06/05/2010 9:46:46 PM PDT by Ingtar (If he could have taxed it, Obama's hole would have been plugged by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

How is the possibility of a radioactive Gulf a good idea?


8 posted on 06/05/2010 9:50:43 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
It's not an option. The decision to use explosives of any kind is entirely determined by the nature of the leak and the composition of the sea floor. Geologists and engineers have already examined this option and determined because of the fracture characteristics of the location it will not seal the leak, and might make it worse.
9 posted on 06/05/2010 9:53:18 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

These idiots just love to say crap to hear their own voices. Did they even think for a second about the sea floor caving in on the oil cavern and releasing everything? Or about the possibility of a tidal wave being generated? Just armchair masturbating nutjobs. Thank God many of them are losing their jobs. You don’t need idiots spewing crap disguised as news. That just dumbs news down altogether.


10 posted on 06/05/2010 9:54:30 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
Because Everything is Better with Nukes™; it's just an extension of Everything is Better with Explosions. Hollywood Logic 101.
11 posted on 06/05/2010 9:56:37 PM PDT by Moose Burger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Maybe they mean nuke BP Headquarters.


12 posted on 06/05/2010 10:08:39 PM PDT by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Seabed collapse ? The well is 15,000 ft under the seabed.

There was a technique of using a special dynamite (gives off tremendous heat) to melt/collapse the casing/bore way down the hole in a series of staggered explosions, apparently used by Red Adair for one, could be all those who knew how to do it got laid off in the last decade or so.
Not heard it mentioned at all.


13 posted on 06/05/2010 10:13:13 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

That was suggested by about day three- along with the theory that a North Korean mini-sub operating off a mother ship which had just left Cuba had torpedoed the rig.


14 posted on 06/05/2010 10:14:47 PM PDT by JimRed (To water the Tree of Liberty is to excise a cancer before it kills us. TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Seeing FredZarguna’s post, maybe it was considered after all.


15 posted on 06/05/2010 10:15:20 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Nuke an out of control oil well 1 mile below the surface, yep that sounds reasonable....does anyone know what will happen when you nuke a oil well spewing oil gas and methane...sounds dumb to me...must have been a member of mensa that suggested it....


16 posted on 06/05/2010 10:16:37 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
The reality is there is a oil reserve under the sea floor..

Nuk it what you get is a cracked or cratered sea floor...

Basically creating a open pit mine sea floor down in to the that oil reserve.......one total mess

Your trying to seal and bury it, not open it up more

Personal long term I think they will go with a modified dome...leaving the dome open at first and establish a foundation in the sea floor, a seal at the base before you close the top to stop the oil

Drive in to the sea floor A large open medal tube around the well head...basically like a bridge piling

Then you fill the inner area with underwater concrete... to establish a foundation in the sea floor

Once that set up ...the tube bridge piling, now around the well head, has a top that can be fitted after and sealed.

17 posted on 06/05/2010 10:17:52 PM PDT by tophat9000 (It ain't about Black... It ain't about White...It's about a Red...Trying to take our rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

The long term solution will be the relief wells being drilled to intersect with the leaking well. They will take the pressure off the leaking well so it can be effectively capped.

Everything they are doing now is a desperation measure designed to slow the leak until the relief wells are finished in two months.


18 posted on 06/05/2010 10:22:27 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

obama will use this power device to brainwash people and said he saved the day. wow this seems all to real


19 posted on 06/05/2010 10:22:55 PM PDT by truthbetold11 (truthbetold11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

Why am I envisioning a huge radioactive tsunami?


20 posted on 06/05/2010 10:30:55 PM PDT by wolfman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson