Skip to comments.
Palin, Romney Play Chess in Primaries
Newsweek ^
| 6/8/10
| Alan Mascarenhas
Posted on 06/08/2010 1:09:17 PM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
None of the above.
Hunter/DeMint 2012!
1
posted on
06/08/2010 1:09:17 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: pissant
yeah i agree
none listed
i hear good things about Mitch Daniels and from what i see of Chris Christie he would be incredible at reigning in spending
2
posted on
06/08/2010 1:10:29 PM PDT
by
DM1
To: pissant
Yes - when Romney and Huckabee get mentioned especially I get and uneasy feeling that the Republicans could manage to blow it.
3
posted on
06/08/2010 1:11:44 PM PDT
by
cvq3842
(ual)
To: pissant
Willard the rat as GOP nominee would cause me to write in Mickey Mouse!
4
posted on
06/08/2010 1:11:50 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
To: pissant
Who's that first guy again?
:-)
5
posted on
06/08/2010 1:12:25 PM PDT
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: pissant
Romney/Charlie Crist 2012!!! (only kidding... do not hit reply and flood me! But if the MSM has their way, and we take our eye off the ball, it could happen.)
6
posted on
06/08/2010 1:12:48 PM PDT
by
avacado
To: Lakeshark
That’s 1% Hunter being pushed again (and again and again) by pissy. Some idiot fools just don’t get it.
7
posted on
06/08/2010 1:15:51 PM PDT
by
newfreep
(Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
To: newfreep; pissant
I was just razzing him.
He needs help.......so I indulge him with humor. Otherwise he'd croak.........
8
posted on
06/08/2010 1:19:16 PM PDT
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Lakeshark
At some point, even an idiot savant would get it - supporting 1% Hunter for President is as futile as hoping Chairman MAO-bama improves the economy - ain’t gonna happen.
9
posted on
06/08/2010 1:22:55 PM PDT
by
newfreep
(Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: newfreep
Agreed. He couldn't get momre votes than "uncommitted" did in the Republican primaries, how's he supposed to win with anything with those kind of numbers?
That said, I liked him, he was a good congressguy, one of the few.
11
posted on
06/08/2010 1:25:01 PM PDT
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: cvq3842
Romney - more liberal than Bush II.
Huckabee??? I don’t know.
We need more youthful, younger, fresher faces.
I’d take Palin before either of them.
13
posted on
06/08/2010 1:28:55 PM PDT
by
ZULU
To: newfreep
14
posted on
06/08/2010 1:34:45 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Palin is playing chess Mitt is playing checkers
15
posted on
06/08/2010 1:42:33 PM PDT
by
unseen1
To: pissant
Romneycare is not a player anymore.
16
posted on
06/08/2010 1:44:54 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: pissant
Myth Romney a conservative? Heck no, but he was the least evil of the 3 remaining evils during the 2008 primaries.
How in the heck could Hunter endorse the Big Liberal Huckster, a HUGE loser and far beyond even RINO status?
17
posted on
06/08/2010 1:45:02 PM PDT
by
newfreep
(Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
To: pissant
-—”Is Mitt a conservative?”-—
Does it matter? The establishment wants Mitt, badly. The establishement always gets their guy (one exception: Reagan in 1980). Only one other name is being floated by the establishment insiders as an alternative to Mitt, and he is expressing a desire to sit it out: Mitch Daniels.
The nomination will be won by one of two people: Palin or Romney. The only possible exception is if all the establishment guys defect en mass to Mitch Daniels. And he has to get serious soon to be a contender, which means changing all of the signals he's been sending about running.
Nobody else will win the nomination. It will be one of these two (three) candidates. Not even Huckabee can win the nod, much less a “none of the above” candidate.
The simple, painful, BRUTAL truth is that Mitt Romney stands as the likely 2012 GOP nominee, whether Freepers like us like it or not.
18
posted on
06/08/2010 1:45:15 PM PDT
by
TitansAFC
("At that point in time (2000 race), McCain was as conservative if not more so than GWB." --- pissant)
To: unseen1
-—”Palin is playing chess Mitt is playing checkers”-—
Mitt is playing neither - he is playing the game he always plays: Monopoly. Rich Uncle Pennybags buys properties and tries to buy votes.
He will again try to buy the nomination.
19
posted on
06/08/2010 1:47:11 PM PDT
by
TitansAFC
("At that point in time (2000 race), McCain was as conservative if not more so than GWB." --- pissant)
To: newfreep
Because Huck was and is more conservative than flipper, and wasn’t a china kneepadder.
And for the record, you were chinslurping Mitt long before it was a 3 man race.
20
posted on
06/08/2010 1:47:56 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson