Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposed SA Smoking Ban Called 'Racist'
WOAI ^ | 6/10/10 | Jim Forsyth

Posted on 06/11/2010 6:54:43 AM PDT by laotzu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: a fool in paradise
It’s the right of business owners to decide if they will permit smoking inside their establishment.

You might as well state....

It’s the right of business owners to decide if they will permit FORCE smoking inside their establishment.

21 posted on 06/11/2010 7:34:48 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Or San Antonio?


22 posted on 06/11/2010 7:37:56 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (If Obama doesn't destroy America, she is indestructible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Show me one business anywhere which requires patrons to smoke.

If you don’t like the way someone runs their business, as long as they aren’t “The State”, you can go somewhere else.


23 posted on 06/11/2010 7:38:18 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Like the tanning salon tax?


24 posted on 06/11/2010 7:41:06 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

If they allow smoking in the business, then they allow non-smokers to breathe in that second hand smoke.

Why can’t I and most other citizens pass laws to prohibit that? It’s still a free country.


25 posted on 06/11/2010 7:43:03 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

My initial reaction is to let them smoke all they want. On second thought - we’ll be paying the hospital bills.


26 posted on 06/11/2010 7:45:54 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Ban tobacco then outright. If you are not permitted to use it in public or in your home or in your car, ban it outright.

That is the California standard. It’s all going that way.


27 posted on 06/11/2010 7:47:54 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

How many people who receive federal welfare also manage to find money for smokes and alcohol?


28 posted on 06/11/2010 7:48:49 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

I’ve always said that if you want to cut down on drug use legalize it, let goverment tax it, let them regulate it, and let the Post Office deliver it. Problem solved.


29 posted on 06/11/2010 7:52:11 AM PDT by hometoroost (Proverbs 8:36 - All those who hate me love death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
They could just look at this and it becomes fairly easy to figure out:

TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas;

30 posted on 06/11/2010 7:52:33 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (No Romney,No Mark Kirk (Illinois), not now, not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

I read a study some time ago that when you factor in the savings on Social Security and other benefits that it’s a wash to a net positive.


31 posted on 06/11/2010 7:54:10 AM PDT by hometoroost (Proverbs 8:36 - All those who hate me love death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

Of course just plain RIGHTS and FREEDOM have nothing to do with it. Only RAAAACISM is important!! Jeeeesh!


32 posted on 06/11/2010 8:08:05 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost

Really? That’s interesting.

So the numbers work for now but wait till SS runs out of money. We’ll still have millions in need of health care.


33 posted on 06/11/2010 8:25:40 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
There are a lot of unpleasant things in life. You gonna be the first one in history to get rid of all of them?

You guys remind me of the telethon that was held on the old “Fernwood 2-night” show, which had a big sign in back of Martin Mull and his co-host, saying, “help stamp out death in our lifetime!”

Yeah, it’s (still) a free country, sort of, and you’re free to go to smoke-free bars if you so choose. You have rights, but so do other people. There’s enough room in the world, methinks, to accomodate everyone.

If you prefer that particular bar that has smoking in it, then you’re gonna have to make a choice, and that’s one of the important elements of life on this planet - making choices.

You make yours. You do not get to make mine.

End of discussion.

CA....

34 posted on 06/11/2010 8:34:55 AM PDT by Chances Are (Whew! Seems I've found that silly grin again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
If they allow smoking in the business, then they allow non-smokers to breathe in that second hand smoke.

Why can’t I and most other citizens pass laws to prohibit that? It’s still a free country.

Ah, yes. The freedom to make everyone else act like you want them to.

Most of these pool halls are holes in the wall where people come to shoot pool, drink beer, and smoke. If enough of the people who frequent these bars say, "Hey, I'm sick of the smoke, someone will open up a pool hall and ban smoking. Then all the people who want to drink beer and shoot pool without smoke will go to that hall. However, a simpler method is to simply force everyone in the place to quit smoking, so you can enjoy your smoke free environment.

No one forces you into a pool hall, and you have the option of going to any pool hall you wish. However, you want to make everyone else conform to your norms, instead of choosing a place that makes you happy.

35 posted on 06/11/2010 8:40:22 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Chances Are
You do not get to make mine.

Yes we do. We are the majority. We vote.

36 posted on 06/11/2010 8:49:53 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Yes we do. We are the majority. We vote.

< snort! >

So do I!

CA....

37 posted on 06/12/2010 9:51:48 PM PDT by Chances Are (Whew! Seems I've found that silly grin again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson