Posted on 06/11/2010 3:24:20 PM PDT by jazusamo
Can’t imagine why. I mean it’s not like homosexual men have much higher rates of transmittable disease or something.
They can test for most everything but it’s simply much cheaper and safer to eliminate high risk folks from the donor pool. Nobody has an inalienable right to have their blood drawn and donated.
human race needs a douche
And they’re not going to stop pursuing this diabolical, dangerous brass ring. Not by a longshot. If they have to install some of their own sodomites on the FDA panel, they will.
It is more than just AIDS. Homosexuals are afflicted with all kinds of diseases that otherwise are found only in the Third World.
Gee,I wonder why there’s something called the Gay Men’s Health Crisis Center....
“Screw the fighting man” is the policy of the Obama Democrats.
How can we see the lifting of DADT as anything but as you describe?
Nine to six is pretty scary, but maybe those nine voices will speak up and be heard regarding the protection of the military blood supply.
The bash lash against this President is going to be deafening.
“Panel votes to keep restrictions on gay blood donations”
Why the hate?/s
You mean there is concern for the health of non-homos out there? Gee, I thought the bigots concerned with public health were relegated to the junkpile of neanderthals. There may be hope yet for those rednecks opposed to the agenda of the fecal-eaters.
For sure donating blood is not a right, and I personally think it's great that a significant consequence of a homosexual lifestyle is made so pointedly.
But on the other hand, one minor reason for giving blood is that it is almost like a basic de facto health check.
When one goes in for a transfusion, can one check a box “No gay blood.”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.