Posted on 06/15/2010 9:01:08 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
NEW YORK (CBS) Perez Hilton might be in some hot water after posting an uncensored photo of Miley Cyrus' private parts to his Twitter account.
Early Monday morning, Hilton posted a picture of the 17-year-old pop star wearing a short white dress and no underwear. In the photo, Cyrus is in the midst of climbing out of an open-topped convertible car with her lady parts exposed.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
I thought that was Paris Hilton for a minute there ... LOL ...
Ew! Ick! Ick! Ick! Ick!
This is beyond sick and wrong.
Wow Miley is going down Lindsey’s dark path. From Disney darling to used up skank in less than a decade.
Oh, yes, mother, your right, you're always right, some of them are velly nice.
i looked up the news on this
the pic I saw was from a London show and she has on panties...the neekid one may have been photoshopped
Perez Hilton is a typical neurotic caker anyhow...a perv fool
Any girl wearing a dress and no underwear is plain stupid. She is a disgrace, this guy, whoever he is (never heard of him) is also a disgrace.
I think he would enjoy prision
Ms Hilton will ‘get off’ free because all this is a misunderstanding. . .
he’s one of them
As long as he stays out of prison, this is nirvana for they guy. Publicity, guaranteed hits on his site, and pumps up his outrageous image. It’s very doubtful there’d be a conviction in a state where they still just consider Roman Polanski misunderstood.
I blew a lot of money taking my grandkids to see a Miley Cyrus concert a couple of years ago. I thought she was a decent performer, and an acceptable role model. Now, it turns out she is just a stupid little skank. She poses all pouty, trying to look sultry and edgy. She just looks stupid and pathetic.
Nothing will come of this. Perez likes putting his penis in other boy’s anuses. That means he is more enlightened than all of us.
It is his social responsibility to put his penis in as many boys’ anuses as time allows. And it is socially irresponsible for anyone to interfere or object.
In court, it will be found that to object to his publishing of child porn is wrong, his child-porn is right, and he is hero for gifting the world with his published photo of Miley Cyrus’ 17 year old vagina. Also, it is fair to showcase him and his struggle to expose the 17 year old vagina by allowing him to also flaunt that he enjoys putting his penis in the anuses of boys.
Angry yet ? Remember this viewpoint the next time someone tells you there is no gay agenda. Remember this the next time you hear someone saying that it’s alright.
Fitting that this homophiliac would post child porn to further the over-sexation of American youth agenda. Do not discount that the Disney pop whore was in on this. She and her pedo father are in on this.
I thought that was Shirley Manson and Garbage.
“lady” hardly, what kind of father would let his 17 year old daughter be anywhere close to this pervert?
I hope it brings Perez down. He is utter scum of the earth.
so why is this homosexual looking at underage girls’ “parts”?
I was reading some of the other stories on this subject. Apparently, Miley moved out of her parent's home into her own multi-million dollar LA pad months ago. Currently, she's living with her 23-year old Australian boyfriend. So yes, I think it's probably safe to assume she's "active".
They, at least, covered up the part in question...unlike filthy Perez Hilton.
http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/gallery/miley-cyrus-upskirt/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.