Skip to comments.
Alaska Objects to Obama Administration Plan to Set-Aside California-Sized Polar Bear Habitat
CNSNews ^
| June 16, 2010
| Dan Joling AP
Posted on 06/16/2010 4:18:00 PM PDT by jazusamo
Anchorage, Alaska - Alaska wildlife officials say they will object to key aspects of federal plans to provide additional protection for polar bears.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will collect testimony in Anchorage Tuesday evening on its proposal to designate critical habitat for the bears, listed two years ago as a threatened species.
The agency has proposed designating 187,166 square miles of U.S. territory as polar bear critical habitat, which means it contains features essential for the conservation of a species and may require special management.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; enviros; polarbears; usfws
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Kempthorne let the enviro nazis get their foot in the door with his ruling and now the enviros will try to make the most of it. Polar bears are neither threatened or endangered.
1
posted on
06/16/2010 4:18:03 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
My bet is there is oil there
2
posted on
06/16/2010 4:23:35 PM PDT
by
colonialhk
(Elect Veterans not Lawyers)
To: colonialhk
Yup
Plus its Lebensraum for Obama’s precious Polar Bears.
3
posted on
06/16/2010 4:24:37 PM PDT
by
omega4179
(www.jdforsenate.com)
To: jazusamo
Is this on the some 70% of fed lands in AK or is this on state land?
4
posted on
06/16/2010 4:25:26 PM PDT
by
deport
To: jazusamo
THere is no doubt polar bears can thrive on human flesh. Environazis interested in having a lot of thriving polar bears about can sacrifice themselves to their new god in a quite personal way.
5
posted on
06/16/2010 4:27:38 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: jazusamo; redhead
What a steaming crock of crap. I yearn for the day that the feds, BLM and Park Service thugs up here start kicking rocks south-bound down the Alcan.
Polar bears are ‘endangered’ politically, and that’s it.
6
posted on
06/16/2010 4:30:24 PM PDT
by
proud_yank
(Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
To: colonialhk
My bet is you’d be right. When Kempthorne made the ruling it was evident the enviros were trying to stop drilling.
7
posted on
06/16/2010 4:30:30 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: deport; proud_yank
Is this on the some 70% of fed lands in AK or is this on state land?I haven't been able to find out yet though it doesn't matter much as to the stopping of drilling.
Do you know anything about the locations, Yank?
8
posted on
06/16/2010 4:33:20 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
What this means is that thousands of acres will be useless for any other purpose except as breeding grounds for Polar beers that are doing just fine now.
9
posted on
06/16/2010 4:36:28 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Venturer
The same Government that killed all the Buffalo to control the Indians, only a different a- hole running it.
10
posted on
06/16/2010 4:37:31 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Venturer
Polar beers I'm in.
I love cold brewski's!
To: colonialhk; deport; Eska; redhead
The agency has proposed designating 187,166 square miles of U.S. territory as polar bear critical habitat, which means it contains features essential for the conservation of a species and may require special management.
Alaska is roughly 600,000 sq mi, and this is about 1/3 of the entire state. Another massive land grab and nothing more.
The north slope- the Arctic tundra north of the Brooks Range to the Arctic Ocean is roughly 90,000 sq mi. The area occupied by 'big oil' (roads, pads, pipelines) is ~315 sq mi, excluding the AK pipeline.
Polar bears don't occupy an area nearly that vast, as they are mainly near the coast. Occasionally they go inland a ways, but not too far. Only one that I know of was ever seen (and shot) near Ft. Yukon.
12
posted on
06/16/2010 4:39:12 PM PDT
by
proud_yank
(Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
To: jazusamo
See my post #12 for more info on that. I don’t know exactly, but since polar bears are only in the northern part of the state it would be the upper 1/3 portion.
This will have a big impact on oil exploration, as most of the polar bear issues target oil.
The feds recently halted a big lease that Shell spent over $2 billion on that was offshore somewhere closer to Barrow.
13
posted on
06/16/2010 4:44:23 PM PDT
by
proud_yank
(Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
To: jazusamo
Alaska Objects to Obama Administration Plan to Set-Aside California-Sized Polar Bear Habitat That's are some big polar bear.
14
posted on
06/16/2010 4:45:21 PM PDT
by
x
To: proud_yank; deport
Thanks much for the info, I knew from before it was about drilling.
15
posted on
06/16/2010 4:47:17 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Can a new President reference all Oobeeee EO’s in one Executive Order and cancel all in one fair swoop?
16
posted on
06/16/2010 4:49:08 PM PDT
by
Pit1
(Not illegal immigrants. They are CRIMINAL BORDER CROSSERS.)
To: proud_yank
Alaska is roughly 600,000 sq mi, and this is about 1/3 of the entire state. Another massive land grab and nothing more.
The Feds already control about 2/3rds of the AK land mass. So this must include or cover part of what the already have. Maybe most will come from their 2/3rds.
17
posted on
06/16/2010 4:51:28 PM PDT
by
deport
To: Pit1
Have no idea but it would sure simplify things, I’m for it! :)
18
posted on
06/16/2010 4:52:09 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Effing fraud is effing fraud!
19
posted on
06/16/2010 5:05:26 PM PDT
by
jimfree
(In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
To: jazusamo
All this "critical habitat" for polar bears and beluga, and nothing for humans. Typical. I found this on Bing:
"critical habitat beluga" and see their plans for the most heavily populated area in Alaska, the Cook Inlet.
20
posted on
06/16/2010 5:11:32 PM PDT
by
redhead
(BP Gulf Blowout Debacle: Obama's CHERNOBYL.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson