Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin has been sentenced to 27 years in prison.
MATZAV ^ | June 21, 2010 | papabrody

Posted on 06/21/2010 3:32:48 PM PDT by papabrody

BREAKING NEWS, 11:50 A.M. est: Matzav.com has learned that Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin ahs been sentenced to 27 years in prison. Sholom Mordechai will also been ordered to pay nearly $31 million restitution when he’s sentenced tomorrow in U.S. District Court.

Chief U.S. District Court Judge Linda Reade issued the sentencing memorandum today, outlining the sentence she will impose at tomorrow’s hearing in Cedar Rapids. Reade indicated in the document she would not impose a fine.

Sholom Mordechai’s attorney Guy Cook says the sentence is unfair and excessive and that the conviction and sentencing will be appealed.

Family, friends and supporters of Sholom Mordechai expressed outrage today. The sentence is greater than the amended recommendation from prosecutors, and is inconsistent with calls from throughout the legal community for Rubashkin to be sentenced in a manner similar to other men and women convicted of white-collar crimes. For rest of the article follow link:

(Excerpt) Read more at matzav.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bastard; border; crook; illegalimmigration; immigration; thief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: ARepublicanForAllReasons
The problem I have with this case is, what did Rubashkin actually do that was criminal?

Read up on it. He has been violating health laws for years...child labor laws...hiring illegals.

They always just gotten wrist slaps and continued to ignore all the laws.

They were pretty much "in your face" about the violations over the years and nobody thought he'd ever have to pay for the crimes.

21 posted on 06/21/2010 4:21:48 PM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: moonhawk; papabrody
Read the article and many of the comments and I still have no idea what this guy did.

Yes, the author assumes the reader already knows all about the story.

Basically Rubashkin was the head guy at a large kosher meatpacking plant in Postville, Iowa. The plant was the site of a large immigration raid - the largest in US history at the time - with lots of workers deported. They also discovered lots of underage workers and some financial irregularities/fraud.

22 posted on 06/21/2010 4:24:43 PM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: papabrody
This was a strange case (actually several cases) that played out over many months in different jurisdictions. I believe this sentence involves the Federal charges of bank fraud and/or embezzlement. After he was convicted in Federal court the prosecutors dropped all the charges related to the hiring of illegal immigrants at the meat packing plant . . . they knew that his sentence for the financial crimes would be so severe that the immigration violations would be overkill and unnecessary.

I believe the charges related to the alleged child labor violations -- which were matters of Iowa state law -- were also dropped for the same reason.

23 posted on 06/21/2010 4:25:18 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Let the Eastern bastards freeze in the dark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
His company, over the years, has violated just about every health law known to science and each time they just got a slap on the wrist. He had illegal Mexicans working there and even violated child labor laws.

I see. So, if it was the US Naval shipyards in San Diego using illegals, that's ok. If it tens of thousands of households in Los Angeles using illegals for their house maids, lawn trimmers and contractors, that's OK. Matter of fact, if men women and children illegals stand outside Home Depot and wait to be picked up every day, that's not only OK, but the taxpayers have to build them shelters, pay for their kids education, health care, and give them welfare checks.

We have whole towns of illegals in California where sewage is running in the streets. Three quarters of the people in the L.A. county jails and most of the gang bangers here are illegals and are getting less time in Jail for assault and battery, attempted murder and armed robbery than this Rabbi.

The prosecutors didn't even ask for this big of a sentence -

“The court’s sentence today is even more than prosecutors asked for, which is a very disturbing development.”

So, the locals are "elated" huh. I call it something else.

24 posted on 06/21/2010 4:33:11 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99; papabrody; moonhawk
He lied to the bank. This looks like a crime that would warrant 5 years. 27 years is insane. This is federal court, meaning that 27 years really is 27 years.

More info here.

Yes, he lied to the bank - and by lying, defrauded them out of $27 million. His sentence was 27 years - 1 year per million dollars the bank lost due to his fraud.

We can argue about whether that's reasonable, but let's at least be clear that this wasn't just a simple "lie."

25 posted on 06/21/2010 4:34:02 PM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
You're just loaded with "moral equivalence" (a definite liberal trait).

"Somebody else got by with something similar...so it's OK."

There is so much you don't know about that place.

It's such a joke that they call their food Kosher...the place was always filthy...cattle excrement making it into the finished product among many of the violations where he just paid a fine and went on as usual.

Did you even bother to look up the history of the place?

26 posted on 06/21/2010 4:38:45 PM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Yep, he defrauded banks out of $27 million dollars....I would say this sentence is just about right. Why all the crying for this criminal here on FR....LOL. What part of “criminal” do these folks not understand.


27 posted on 06/21/2010 4:43:55 PM PDT by northwinds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: northwinds

Nobody questions the fact that the guy is scummy and deserves to be in prison. What people are discussing is the question of justice: find another criminal that got the same length of imprisonment for the same crime.


28 posted on 06/21/2010 4:53:06 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
You're just loaded with "moral equivalence" (a definite liberal trait)

Not liberal at all. I have seen this before though. I have a very good friend whose life was destroyed by an over zealous prosecuter and king-sh*t cop judge. Destroyed his business, ruined his life, took all of his wealth. While he beat all his charges they made sit in jail for a time anyway, while the jail house guards took turns insulting him. Guess what, he just happened to be a religeous Jew. What a coincidence.

Did you even bother to look up the history of the place?

I am very familiar with it. I just don't think he deserves 27 years in the pen for it.

29 posted on 06/21/2010 4:57:19 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
but I suspect that his appearance may have been the major factor, and if that means antisemitism at the forfront, then that's what it is.

Maybe it was the cover-up of running 389 slave laborers all of them illegal.

Men like Rubashkin are destroying the country for greed.

30 posted on 06/21/2010 4:58:25 PM PDT by donna (Yah Mo B There - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HbbM-FG8lQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

Its just funny to me because I’ve never seen anyone on FR defending criminals and being upset over what sentence they received.


31 posted on 06/21/2010 5:01:20 PM PDT by northwinds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: northwinds
" I’ve never seen anyone on FR defending criminals "

And you are not seeing that on this thread either.

It is sad that people who care about fairness of our justice system amuse you. Do you care about the Constitution, the fact that we are a country of laws, not men?

32 posted on 06/21/2010 5:03:24 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
More moral equivalence.

I'd venture to say that his religion (even though he seriously abused it by contaminating Kosher food with animal feces) is your main/only point of interest.

Had he been a Catholic you wouldn't have even posted.

33 posted on 06/21/2010 5:04:06 PM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

Hey calm down....this guy’s lucky he didn’t get Bernie Madoff’s judge....150 years and counting. Then there’s Bernie Ebbers from WorldCom and on and on....I won’t shed a tear for this illegal alien employing, child labor law violating, health code violating, bank defrauding ba*tard....you can cry for him all you want.


34 posted on 06/21/2010 5:09:41 PM PDT by northwinds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: northwinds
"....I won’t shed a tear for this illegal alien employing, child labor law violating, health code violating, bank defrauding ba*tard....you can cry for him all you want."

Yes, that was the point of my exercise. In all of your posts, despite all the help to the contrary, you are screaming that you have not a clue about principles. You take sides and expect others to do so. You can't see a principled position when you are looking at it.

I wouldn't want to be in the trenches with you: sides can be changed, but principled people stick with principles.

Unfortunately, you don't even disagree with me: you don't have a clue what I and other people say here.

Have a good night; sleep on your chosen side.

35 posted on 06/21/2010 5:21:53 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

Wow...now that’s a high falutin’ ramblin’ on self-defense of your “principled (sic) position” in defense of a scum-bag criminal...and you’re right...I don’t have a clue as to what the hell you’re talking about at this point. LMAO


36 posted on 06/21/2010 5:26:03 PM PDT by northwinds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm; Nachum; Alberta's Child
The problem you refuse to address is the basis of the sentence. You seem to want him sentenced for presumably non-Kosher Kosher meat. Likely a civil action, but not charged, and frankly not a charge heard much from the people who eat Kosher meat, thus might be knowledgeable.

Hiring illegals, I don't like that and would like to see employers financially ruined who employ them. No problem with jail time. 27 years might be a tad long.

But here in the USA, if you want to send someone to jail for employing illegals, you have to charge them with employing illegals. That didn't happen, if your implication is correct that the judge sentenced him for a crime he didn't commit, the judge should be impeached. But I'm sure he didn't.

Child labor, similar, but the prosecutor did charge him. My understanding we're talking 17 year olds, not 8, but no matter, child labor is child labor. And deserves a jail term.

Darn, the stinking jury acquitted him.

Oh well, no problem, he is guilty of wire fraud, so we'll just lump everything in together!

That's not the way our justice system works, at least not the way it's intended to work.

The controversy of the Postville plant has been documented since it was opened. Rubashkin and his kind (Jews) weren't welcome in all corners of the community. Lots written about that. Non-Kosher Kosher food, illegals, child labor, didn't fit in with the community. All of it irrelevant to the sentencing. His sentence doesn't appear to be consistant with other sentences for the same crime, though certainly within the judge's authority.

37 posted on 06/21/2010 5:32:01 PM PDT by SJackson (most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it, M Sanger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: donna
Maybe it was the cover-up of running 389 slave laborers all of them illegal....Men like Rubashkin are destroying the country for greed.

Could be.

Yes, I know greed is destroying the country, what we need is Hope and Change. Thank you Michelle

To the point, which is the sentence, can you show me where he was convicted for running 389 slave laborers all of them illegal?

Or doesn't that matter in Rubashkin's case?

And if not, why not.

38 posted on 06/21/2010 5:34:59 PM PDT by SJackson (most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it, M Sanger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

>>But in any case, employment of illegals was irrelevant.<<

BS in capital letters! This dude was selling kosher meat products to the Jewish community. He’s an Orthodox Jew. A leader in the Jewish community, no less and he didn’t put out the word for his employees to obey ALL the rules of the FDA and the laws of the US and Iowa state.

Being Jewish doesn’t give you a reason to break the law it is supposed to give you reasons to support them! I am glad he got busted and glad that he got hit with the hard time sentence.

If you support the illegals crossing the border and sucking up on our tax dollars, then you owe me a couple of hundred grand in tax dollars I’ve had to pay to support these frigging parasites.


39 posted on 06/21/2010 5:37:37 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Remember, guys, the enemy is to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Being Jewish doesn’t give you a reason to break the law

No one has suggested it does.

The question is whether being a Jewish criminal means your sentence is based on general community attitudes as opposed to the crime of which you've been convicted.

Our system of jurisprudence relies on the latter, it's clear that many FR type conservatives don't.

40 posted on 06/21/2010 5:46:07 PM PDT by SJackson (most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it, M Sanger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson