Skip to comments.This is How Much Salonís Glenn Greenwald Hates America and How Stupid He Thinks His Readers Are
Posted on 06/26/2010 12:06:16 PM PDT by HorowitzianConservative
Id like everyone whose mind is unclouded by the radical hatred of America to read these two paragraph from the Washington Times in which Eli Lake interviews Terrorism adviser John Brennan. Brennan says:
Dozens of Americans have joined terrorist groups and are posing a threat to the United States and its interests abroad, the presidents most senior adviser on counterterrorism and homeland security said Thursday. . . . There are, in my mind, dozens of U.S. persons who are in different parts of the world, and they are very concerning to us, said John O. Brennan, deputy White House national security adviser for homeland security and counterterrorism. . . .
If a person is a U.S. citizen, and he is on the battlefield in Afghanistan or Iraq trying to attack our troops, he will face the full brunt of the U.S. military response, Mr. Brennan said. If an American person or citizen is in a Yemen or in a Pakistan or in Somalia or another place, and they are trying to carry out attacks against U.S. interests, they also will face the full brunt of a U.S. response. And it can take many forms.
The understanding of most sane people would be, Oh, excellent, Brennan is saying that were going to attack terrorists. This is much better than him buying the Taqiyya spin and claiming that Jihad is a legitimate spiritual practice instead of religious-sanctioned war.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...
I would feel a lot more secure if Mr. Brennan were to be in charge of the Taliban.
You are right and good post.
I think this makes more sense if one follows the link. :’)
When you immediately qualify it with the next sentence:
"And that can take many forms."
If one of those forms that the full brunt of a U.S. response might take is "assassination," then that's how it would thus translate. And since the author put no limitations on "many forms," one of the "any" forms is most certainly "assassination."
Bill Ayers, either an acolyte or a string-puller of O'Bunga, has said in an interview that, to accomplish the total translation of America from a capitalistic Constitutional Republic to a Utopian Socialist Oligarchy will require as much as 25% of the population being interred in massive "re-education camps." He then went on to state that, of those, 12-25% would likely prove incorrigible, and beyond redemption. When asked what would be done with the un-fixable, he stated that they would have to be "eliminated."
Millions of Americans who refuse to accept the New World Oder... would have to be assassinated. Fighting against the new paradigm might well find them considered "terrorists" by the then-powers-that-be.
With the exception of the fact of this Ayers interview, all this is hypothetical. The liklihood that mainstream America will ever let the Liberal Lunatics take us that far is slim as of this writing. But to pretend that this is not their goal, or that the idea of "assassinating" a few dozen nekulturney refusniks is somehow beyond them is the most fabulous and delusional form of blatant denial.
It is also extremely dangerous, when faced with this radical and extreme a foe, to underestimate their capacity for visiting horrors on those who stand between them and their imagined Utopia.
History is littered with millions upon tens-of-millions of corpses of those who chose not to speak truth in the face of pure evil.
There is a glut of lefty scibblers like Greentoad who represent the viewpoints of maybe less than five percent of Americans. Even most Dem voters want to see our enemies destroyed. Unfortunately, the Dem party is now run by the five percent leftist fanatics who truly hate America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.