Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maggief
Why has no one considered that the break up of their marriage could be ASSET PROTECTION. Maybe Algore knows some big law suit is around the corner and he and Tipper are protecting their assets by putting everything in her name and then getting divorced. He can not loose anything in a lawsuit if he does not have anything. If they are still married, having everything in Tipper's name still does not protect their assets, they have to be no longer married for all of their assets to be protected.
21 posted on 06/27/2010 7:52:13 AM PDT by Cindy of Nashville (What has the Democrat party become???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cindy of Nashville

IIRC, asset transferred within X years preceding a judgment would be subject a court’s putting them back into the ownership of the original owner.


36 posted on 06/27/2010 10:13:14 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson