Why has no one considered that the break up of their marriage could be ASSET PROTECTION. Maybe Algore knows some big law suit is around the corner and he and Tipper are protecting their assets by putting everything in her name and then getting divorced. He can not loose anything in a lawsuit if he does not have anything. If they are still married, having everything in Tipper's name still does not protect their assets, they have to be no longer married for all of their assets to be protected.
posted on 06/27/2010 7:52:13 AM PDT
by Cindy of Nashville
(What has the Democrat party become???)
To: Cindy of Nashville
IIRC, asset transferred within X years preceding a judgment would be subject a court’s putting them back into the ownership of the original owner.
posted on 06/27/2010 10:13:14 AM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson