Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martin Ginsburg, justice's husband, dies
Associated Press ^ | June 27, 2010

Posted on 06/27/2010 1:02:04 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Martin Ginsburg, the husband of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and a prominent lawyer in his own right, has died. He was 78.

The Supreme Court says in a statement that Ginsburg died at home Sunday from complications of metastatic cancer.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baderginsburg; ginsburg; lawyers; martinginsburg; obituary; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY

RIP


21 posted on 06/27/2010 2:06:28 PM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

IIRC when I have seen Ginsburg interviewed she mentioned that her husband Martin was often the cook for Supreme Court family get togethers.


22 posted on 06/27/2010 2:15:01 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
...it would probably be centrist liberal...

That species is possibly extinct by now. How would you define it?

23 posted on 06/27/2010 2:28:06 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Prayeres for comfort and strength for the family in their loss. No one should have to suffer this terrible and torturous disease, and no family should have to watch their loved one go through it.


24 posted on 06/27/2010 2:53:09 PM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devere
If she didn’t retire to care for her ailing husband, she won’t do it now.

That makes sense to me also!

25 posted on 06/27/2010 4:08:51 PM PDT by mckenzie7 (Democrats = Trough Sloppers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I wouldn’t wish loss on any family. I hope she finds comfort in her time of loss.


26 posted on 06/27/2010 4:44:16 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

bttt


27 posted on 06/27/2010 4:51:11 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Condolences to Justice Ginsburg and family.

She and her husband celebrated their 56th wedding anniversary last week. I’m glad they were able to celebrate that together.


28 posted on 06/27/2010 4:51:31 PM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Condolences to Justice Ginsburg and her family.


29 posted on 06/27/2010 5:18:26 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Obama: "I will gladly pay you on Tuesday for a hamburger today.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

The possibility of which was pointed out over and over again to the “I can’t possibly vote for McCain” crowd.

Sign.


30 posted on 06/27/2010 5:19:20 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Obama: "I will gladly pay you on Tuesday for a hamburger today.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

Can you imnagine if McCain had been able to replace Souter and Stevens. He’d have been the most consequential GOP President ever. Conservatives would be singing his praises on a daily basis. Although, who knows, Reagan only went 1 for 3. We all love Reagan, but he totally failed with O’Connor and Kennedy. If he got even one of the two right Roe would be long gone as would a whole host of other decisions.

It’s really amazing. From 1975-1990 5 of the Justices in the Roe majority retired. All 5 were replaced by GOP Presidents. Only only 1 of the 5 replacements voted to reverse Roe. 4 of the 5 upheld it. Both Reagan and Bush41 ran on explicit anti-Roe and anti-abortion platforms. They got to replace 4 pro-Roe justices and only 1 of them(Scalia)ended up being anti-Roe. Probably the biggest failure of the Reagan era.

As for Ginsburg, I have to think she retires next year. I can’t imagine her wanting to chance Obama’s reelection in 2012. I’m surprised she stuck on past this year. The Senate will look much different and Obama will have much more difficulty getting another liberal confirmed. The GOP may even take control and Ginsburg retiring would probably move the Court to the right, if anything.


31 posted on 06/27/2010 5:37:24 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

God bless.

Horrible - they have each gone through cancer together? I hadn’t heard that. Terrible thing.


32 posted on 06/27/2010 7:56:45 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

And I thought Bush had it good.


33 posted on 06/27/2010 7:57:38 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
idiocy-obama
34 posted on 06/27/2010 7:59:56 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25
Can you imnagine if McCain had been able to replace Souter and Stevens. He’d have been the most consequential GOP President ever.

Not with the current composition of the Senate - McCain woulda been lucky to get 2 more "Kennedys" ...

35 posted on 06/27/2010 8:39:03 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

RIP.


36 posted on 06/27/2010 8:53:28 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Prayers up.

As an aside, what kind of man would marry a woman who would advocate lowering the age of consent for sexual activity to twelve years old?


37 posted on 06/27/2010 8:56:59 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devere; trumandogz
“And this may be a strong indication that Justice Ginsburg will soon retire thus granting Obama his third nominee for the SCOTUS.”

You can't go much further left than Ginsburg. This won't upset the balance of the court in the short term.

Let me know if Obama appoints a 12 year old "Doogie Houser." That would have some serious long term effects.

38 posted on 06/27/2010 8:59:36 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear

“As an aside, what kind of man would marry a woman who would advocate lowering the age of consent for sexual activity to twelve years old?”

A religious man? 12 (13 for men) is the age specified in the Old Testament. Of course times have changed, and many people who say they believe in the Bible, really aren’t serious.


39 posted on 06/27/2010 9:32:27 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: devere

Well, God has no problem with persons of this age being considered adults for the purposes of marriage. Note well that this is for the purposes of marriage, this is not for the purposes of playing around outside the matrimonial bond, which was sternly punished no matter how old you were.


40 posted on 06/27/2010 9:36:29 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson