Skip to comments.
US: Sinking of SKorean warship not terrorism
AP on Yahoo ^
| 6/28/10
| Matthew Lee - ap
Posted on 06/28/2010 11:12:23 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON The Obama administration is saying that the sinking of a South Korean warship blamed on North Korea was not terrorism, and not enough by itself to put the Pyongyang back on a U.S. terror blacklist.
The State Department said Monday that the March sinking of the frigate Cheonan was a "provocative action" and a violation of the truce that ended the Korean war. But it added that the sinking by a reported North Korean torpedo strike was the act of one state's military against another.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 201003; cheonan; communism; fail; fascism; georgeorwell; korea; liberalfascism; nationalsecurityfail; nkorea; norks; northkorea; orwell; orwellianfascism; prezflustercluck; republicofkorea; sinking; skorean; southkorea; terrorism; terrorist; warship; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-96 next last
To: NormsRevenge
The first anti-American US President is working overtime.
2
posted on
06/28/2010 11:13:24 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
To: NormsRevenge
Bombing Pearl Harbor wasn't "terrorism" either, it was an act of war.
3
posted on
06/28/2010 11:13:53 AM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(We couldn't keep the commandments when there was only ONE!)
To: NormsRevenge
No, not an act of terrorism, but clearly an act of war and a violation of the armistice. It should have been met with swift and decisive military force. Instead, the feckless reaction of South Korea and her allies only emboldens the NORKS.
Meanwhile.. North of the Demilitarized Zone.FRom Michelle's WH garden to NK with Love..?
MMMmmm .. runch.

This undated picture, released from North Korean official Korean Central News Agency on June 21, shows North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il inspecting a radish at the training centre for commanding officers of KPA Unit 593 at undisclosed place in North Korea. The world faces a "dangerous period" as Kim Jong-Il tries to cement in his son as his successor, the CIA chief Leon Panetta said Sunday.« Read less (AFP/KCNA/KNS/File)
5
posted on
06/28/2010 11:14:58 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
To: NormsRevenge
“The Obama administration is saying that the sinking of a South Korean warship blamed on North Korea was not terrorism, and not enough by itself to put the Pyongyang back on a U.S. terror blacklist.”
I suppose that Iran is not in the list also because “wiping out Israel from the map” is not enough, right?
6
posted on
06/28/2010 11:15:03 AM PDT
by
greatdefender
(If You Want Peace.....Prepare For War)
To: NormsRevenge
For once I agree. It’s not an act of terrorism. It’s an act of war.
7
posted on
06/28/2010 11:15:21 AM PDT
by
Pessimist
To: NormsRevenge
Assuming that the sub that fired the torpedo was NK flagged and crewed by NK Navy personnel then technically he is correct. It was an act of war not terrorism. Terrorism requires that the perpetrators be out of uniform.
Of course the fact that another country commits an act of war and nobody seems to get particularly upset about it is a completely different matter.
8
posted on
06/28/2010 11:15:28 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
Thank You, Comrades at the State Department!
9
posted on
06/28/2010 11:15:47 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
To: NormsRevenge
“The Obama administration is saying that the sinking of a South Korean warship blamed on North Korea was not terrorism,” and the Obama family’s Portuguese Water Dog is really a cat.
10
posted on
06/28/2010 11:16:28 AM PDT
by
Winged Hussar
(http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
To: NormsRevenge
I would have to agree.
The sinking was nothing but an ACT of WAR.
11
posted on
06/28/2010 11:17:15 AM PDT
by
Howie66
(I can see November from my house.)
To: NormsRevenge
If it was an American ship, would
Pres_ _ent Obama would just claim food additives had been delivered?

John Brennan:"Jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam"
12
posted on
06/28/2010 11:18:56 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
To: NormsRevenge
This is so absurd and such a non- American response, Im not even sure what to say. But I do know one thing, we just invited another sinking or worse maybe even the downing of a passenger airline flying innocently between Japan and Seoul. And the blood shed will be on Obamas hands.
To: NormsRevenge
So it is an act of war, but the US will not back S Korea in any putative war. Allies come. Allies go. Peace, man.
14
posted on
06/28/2010 11:21:43 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
( Two-state solution: A bad idea whose time has gone.)
To: OldDeckHand; Graybeard58
No, not an act of terrorism, but clearly an act of war and a violation of the armistice. It should have been met with swift and decisive military force. Instead, the feckless reaction of South Korea and her allies only emboldens the NORKS. Exactly right.
15
posted on
06/28/2010 11:22:54 AM PDT
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Graybeard58
Exactly.
This was an act of war, not terrorism.
16
posted on
06/28/2010 11:26:06 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(06/15/2010 Obama's Shame-Wow address...)
To: Graybeard58
Bingo Friend! If it is anything other than an act of WAR, I don’t know what it is.
17
posted on
06/28/2010 11:26:55 AM PDT
by
JerseyDvl
(Sometimes the road less traveled.... is less traveled for a reason.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
18
posted on
06/28/2010 11:29:54 AM PDT
by
353FMG
(ISLAM - America's guaranteed road to destruction.)
To: NormsRevenge
Of course its not terrorism. It is an act of war.
19
posted on
06/28/2010 11:30:52 AM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: NormsRevenge
It was not terrorism...it was a blatant act of war and should be treated as such by both S. Korea and the U.S.
There should be a disproportionate response where the S. Korean Navy (which is very modern and very capable) assisted by the U.S. Navy takes out three or four of N. Koreas best frigates and or submarines...plain and simple. You hit us, we will absolutely pound you.
But this Marxist President of ours will give them a pass...because he does not want to ruffle the feathers of the N. Korean Marxist or the Chinese.
20
posted on
06/28/2010 11:31:47 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Diogenesis
You continue to be an FR treasure.
To: NormsRevenge
Other things it is not:
It is not a bad hair day.
It is not an oopsie.
It is not a mulligan.
However, it could be traced directly to global warming and/or George Bush.
22
posted on
06/28/2010 11:34:04 AM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: NormsRevenge
It isn’t terrorism—it’s an act of war.
To: Jeff Head
Is that really you, Jeff?
Glad to see you - so to speak - up and around.
To: NormsRevenge
I have to agree. It isn’t terrorism. It’s an act of war.
25
posted on
06/28/2010 11:38:17 AM PDT
by
stevem
To: NormsRevenge
lol
The US isn’t Europe. We can’t run and hide behind someone.
And when we do, really, really bad things happen.
26
posted on
06/28/2010 11:39:21 AM PDT
by
Red6
(Where's my stuff? I want some more stuff too Mr. President!)
To: NormsRevenge
>But it added that the sinking by a reported North Korean torpedo strike was the act of one state’s military against another.
Otherwise known by the sane as an Act of War.
27
posted on
06/28/2010 11:40:29 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: NormsRevenge
28
posted on
06/28/2010 11:40:49 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
( WOLVERINES!)
To: NormsRevenge
29
posted on
06/28/2010 11:41:32 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
To: NavyCanDo
No, it isn’t.
He’s no Ronald Reagan, that’s for sure.
30
posted on
06/28/2010 11:43:06 AM PDT
by
Red6
(Where's my stuff? I want some more stuff too Mr. President!)
To: NormsRevenge
Terrorism?!
Of course not - the North was simply conducting an “underseas contingency operation” \sarcasim.
BTW - it certainly was an act of War but this wimp can't even say the word terror so I would never expect he'd find the guts to even consider the word War.
31
posted on
06/28/2010 11:44:38 AM PDT
by
R0CK3T
To: AFreeBird
Well, not completely “up and around” yet...still in the hospital, but doing therapy now. Will be released in a week. Then it is eight weeks of pretty intensive out patient (long, hard and painful) before trying to go back to work. Buy, definite improvement and healing going on here and I praise God and the faith of so many, including a lot of Freepers, too mammy to name, for it!
32
posted on
06/28/2010 11:45:40 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: NormsRevenge
Just an act of war is all...
33
posted on
06/28/2010 11:47:20 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?)
To: Graybeard58
Bombing Pearl Harbor wasn't "terrorism" either, it was an act of war.Yes, and the sinking of this warship is also an act of War. NKOR engaged in a clear "act of war" against South Korea. And Actions have Consequences.
34
posted on
06/28/2010 11:47:24 AM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
To: NormsRevenge
To: NormsRevenge
Um, no it isn’t an act of terrorism. It’s an act of war.
36
posted on
06/28/2010 11:55:01 AM PDT
by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: Jeff Head
I’m glad to hear you’re on the mend. You’re in my thoughts and prayers.
37
posted on
06/28/2010 11:57:37 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: Jeff Head
How does the piece of dung in the WH get to decide? Does he now speak for the UN and the Hague?
38
posted on
06/28/2010 11:59:15 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: NormsRevenge
39
posted on
06/28/2010 12:01:19 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
To: NormsRevenge
But it added that the sinking by a reported North Korean torpedo strike was the act of one state's military against another. In the old days, they called this and ACT OF WAR!...................
40
posted on
06/28/2010 12:01:55 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. He's just some guy in the neighborhood.............)
To: Jeff Head
Well, glad to hear things are progressing. We’ve missed you round these parts.
To: Pessimist
What would Barry call it if they nuked Seoul? An unfortunate escalation of rhetoric?
42
posted on
06/28/2010 12:04:42 PM PDT
by
DManA
To: Graybeard58
Bombing Pearl Harbor wasn't "terrorism" either, it was an act of war.according to the "O" boy it "was the act of one state's military against another."
No Biggie
43
posted on
06/28/2010 12:06:40 PM PDT
by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: OldDeckHand
44
posted on
06/28/2010 12:08:46 PM PDT
by
TheDon
("Citizen" of Kalifornia, USSA)
To: NormsRevenge
This comes in the wake of the North's implication it was making a hydrogen bomb. Surrender!!
One way of looking at 9/11 is that it was a legitimate expression on Islamic Jihad. One and a third billion people see it this way. They are enemies of America but we can't say so. By the same twisted thought process, North Korea heroically struck a blow for justice against the South Korean puppets of America.
I spout all this garbage because it is consistent with Progressive and academic beliefs right her in the USA.
45
posted on
06/28/2010 12:13:32 PM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: NormsRevenge
Electing Obama, on the other hand, was.
46
posted on
06/28/2010 12:16:02 PM PDT
by
RightOnTheLeftCoast
(Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
To: greatdefender
"I suppose that Iran is not in the list also because ?wiping out Israel from the map? is not enough, right?"
Actually, after everything Obama has done to run interference for Iran and weaken Israel, he might receive a 12th Imam medal from Ahmadinejhad.
47
posted on
06/28/2010 12:18:30 PM PDT
by
Truth29
To: Howie66; NormsRevenge
I'd call it an act of War, too.
Remember the Maine!
48
posted on
06/28/2010 12:30:10 PM PDT
by
SmithL
To: NormsRevenge
He’s right, terrorism is something done a non-state actor. This was a state, so doesn’t it count as an act of war?
49
posted on
06/28/2010 12:31:24 PM PDT
by
livius
To: Pessimist
For once I agree. Its not an act of terrorism. Its an act of war. Ditto.
50
posted on
06/28/2010 12:34:59 PM PDT
by
Wyatt's Torch
(I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson