Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juan Williams: Obama Has Declared War On Supreme Court
http://radioviceonline.com/ ^ | June 28, 2010 | Jim Vicevich

Posted on 06/28/2010 5:09:34 PM PDT by Biggirl

Well, in particular, Chief Justice John Roberts. Of course this should not come as a surprise to anyone. He declares war on anyone that dares disagree with him. So let’s see. Obama controls Congress, two auto companies, college loans, health care and in the process has expanded executive branch powers and now declares war on John Roberts because why? Because the young President doesn’t have total control? Doesn’t Roberts know Obama is the President

(Excerpt) Read more at radioviceonline.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jimvicevich; juanwilliams; obama; scotus; ussc; williams
Jim hit this one right out of the ball park! Elections MEAN something!
1 posted on 06/28/2010 5:09:40 PM PDT by Biggirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Biggirl; justiceseeker93; ExTexasRedhead; neverdem; Oceander

It would be nice if we were able to stop the Kagan confirmation, but the numbers aren’t there.


2 posted on 06/28/2010 5:15:56 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Most likely she will coast to the justice position.


3 posted on 06/28/2010 5:19:08 PM PDT by Biggirl (Pray for the people and animals affected in the Gulf of Mexico by oilspill. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Oh yeah, she’s in. Our only hope is that she’s no worse than what’s she’s replacing. And that’s a mighty low bar.


4 posted on 06/28/2010 5:26:41 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes (No matter where you go there are always more stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I don’t understand what all the fuss is about;
the Republicans don’t have the votes to stop it, anyway


5 posted on 06/28/2010 5:28:05 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (If November does not turn out well, then beware of December.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

She is going to get in, one way or another. Just hope the other conservatives stay heathly!


6 posted on 06/28/2010 5:34:26 PM PDT by Biggirl (Pray for the people and animals affected in the Gulf of Mexico by oilspill. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Correction, just hope the “conservatives” stay healthy!


7 posted on 06/28/2010 5:35:11 PM PDT by Biggirl (Pray for the people and animals affected in the Gulf of Mexico by oilspill. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

“I don’t understand what all the fuss is about;
the Republicans don’t have the votes to stop it, anyway”

The man put up a travesty of a nominee. If nothing else, a bright light should be shown on the woman so the public can see the consequences of voting for a socialist.


8 posted on 06/28/2010 5:36:55 PM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I can disrail her nomination with one question:

“Professor Kagan, do you think that a single-payer system is Constitutional...if applied to the legal profession?”


9 posted on 06/28/2010 5:42:36 PM PDT by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for, it matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Probably not; but let's not give up with just a whimper. We need to make sure the feckless little bee-itches in Congress know that they've further incurred the wrath of motivated voters for this Fall, and that there will be a price to pay for letting this piece of s**t onto the Supreme Court.


10 posted on 06/28/2010 5:47:12 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Oh, the numbers are there:

.22, .30-06, .38, .40, .410ga, .44, .45, .50, 5.56, 5.7, 9, 10, 10ga, 12ga, 20ga

The problem is that the American people seem to be too squeamish to use those numbers.
This may change as more people realize that we have three branches of tyranny instead of any government.
However, it is disturbing that the people appear to be so “Stockholm Syndrome”-ed that they view the recent 4/5 second amendment case as a victory; it is, at best, a “put it off `till later” ploy... at worst, it sets up the field for further restrictions on firearms because it does not address “common sense gun laws” as infringements.


11 posted on 06/28/2010 5:53:24 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

He’s like a spoiled child who isnt getting his way and cant understand why.


12 posted on 06/28/2010 6:03:32 PM PDT by culpeper (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
Oh yeah, she’s in. Our only hope is that she’s no worse than what’s she’s replacing. And that’s a mighty low bar.

True. But since there's the increasingly likely possibility that a bunch of Barry's ccoreligionists will vaporize the whole rotten city, and that probability increases with each passing day, and the event will take Kagan and the rest of Hell's First String with it, it's not all bad.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

13 posted on 06/28/2010 6:06:29 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

The average American doesn’t care one iota about the Supreme Court, and probably doesn’t even understand what it does. Unless Republicans can extract something like “Long Dong Silver” from a witness, this hearing will never, ever, reach main street. Kagan is in, unless something earth shattering is discovered, which is highly unlikely considering she hasn’t done a damn thing in the area of jurisprudence in her career.


14 posted on 06/28/2010 6:11:23 PM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GnL

Likely true. As terrible as a selection as Kagan is, the good news is she is replacing a terrible Justice’s seat. The net loss is not great.


15 posted on 06/28/2010 6:13:44 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

bookmark


16 posted on 06/28/2010 6:15:59 PM PDT by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

The net loss is time. An old leftist justice is replaced by a young leftist justice. Each time that happens the likelihood of a near term positive shift in balance become less. We don’t want to have all the old guys on the Court. Fortunately Roberts and Alito are quite young.


17 posted on 06/28/2010 6:20:22 PM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GnL

Agreed. I almost posted that age is the only gain here, and that pretty nutty leftist is being replaced by a total nut, but the voting records will not likely be much different.


18 posted on 06/28/2010 6:36:26 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

you left out a rope


19 posted on 06/28/2010 6:48:24 PM PDT by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jrd

At least she is fat/bloated and may experience health complications.


20 posted on 06/28/2010 6:58:15 PM PDT by hal ogen ($10 (I think) amounts through the internet from all over the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

“At least she is fat/bloated and may experience health complications.”

.
Don’t kid yourself pal, she’s healthier than you’ll ever hope to be. She’ll out-live all the rest of them.
.


21 posted on 06/28/2010 7:01:52 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jrd

Ah, but the only way that really would have meaning is with trials... and, as I said, the American people are too Stockholm Syndrome-ed to realize that this was NOT a good ruling (barely adequate, if that) and will see it as an “act of kindness” from their black-robed gods.

Luckily we also have a egocentric, power-drunk, executive god-emperor (see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFHKIFDjk9I ), which means that there could be some political/power-wise infighting there. {IE the separation of powers might give us a little break...}

However, given the liquidity of the law (see “Constitutional Chaos” & “Three Felonies a Day”) we “generally law abiding” Citizens are in a world of crap and things are, IMO, past the point where the government is destructive of the rights whose protection is the sole legitimate purpose of government.


22 posted on 06/28/2010 7:05:28 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

It doesn’t mater how she’ll answer. She’ll just lie through her teeth as Sotomayer did when asked if the second amendment is an individual right.


23 posted on 06/29/2010 9:03:04 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson