Posted on 06/28/2010 6:30:39 PM PDT by STARWISE
Just a sidesplitter, isn’t it ?
They think we’re so stupid ..
Gaspard’s omission is a potentially embarrassing episode for the Obama administration, which has made a high priority of ethics.How can anyone possibly write such a sentence without putting </sarcasm> after it?
Hoisted on their own gaspard.
Yeah, on the newly-hired Client No. 9's show.
The dates listed in the story make it look like he was double dipping. How could he earn $172,200 in 2009 and “also worked for Obama’s campaign, and later worked for the transition team”? Most of his 2009 money must have come from White House job but still Obama was running for president in 2008.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.