posted on 06/29/2010 11:25:34 AM PDT
Whether the new Chicago and D.C. fees "infringe" on an individual's right to own a gun for self-protection must still be reviewed by the Supreme Court.
Thanks for the info & essay!
posted on 06/29/2010 11:28:48 AM PDT
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
posted on 06/29/2010 12:14:01 PM PDT
by Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
"D.C. went so far as to still ban all semiautomatic handguns that can hold a clip."
I don't know of any semi-automatic handguns that holds a "clip."
posted on 06/29/2010 12:40:07 PM PDT
Paul Helmke... The 21st Century version of Nathan Bedford Forrest. Keep spewing your anti-civil rights garbage Paul... Don’t forget your burning cross and bed sheet.
posted on 06/29/2010 5:57:34 PM PDT
by BCR #226
(07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
...Chicago's Mayor Richard Daley called it ... very frightening ... governments have... compelling interest in reducing crime related to firearms."
If Daley wants to reduce crime he should devise a system that encourages FEWER criminals.
posted on 06/30/2010 7:05:33 AM PDT
(More people are killed every year by falling vending machines than by holders of concealed-weapons)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson