Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Ms. Kagan, Are You Now or Have You Ever Been a Lesbian?”
Preacher Helps ^ | June 30, 2010 | Dr. Don Boys

Posted on 06/30/2010 11:28:51 PM PDT by John Leland 1789

The above pertinent, personal, and principled question will not be asked of the new Supreme Court nominee because no senator has the courage, commitment, and character to ask it, although only a fool or fanatic says the question is illegitimate. Even “conservative” Republicans are silent on this matter. Maybe some of them need a spinal transplant to help them take a stand. I don’t expect Democrats to take a stand since they haven’t stood for anything worthwhile since Senator “Scoop” Henry Jackson died Sept. 1, 1983 and Congressman Larry McDonald was killed the same day when Koran Air Flight 077 was shot down by Russian interceptors presumably killing all on board.

Reports have been circulating that Kagan’s chosen homosexual lifestyle is well known in the Harvard community and her partner is commonly known. She has not been trying to hide her sexual identify—until now.

The White House refuses to deny her sexual aberration, but her appointment is a further indication that Obama is trying to live up to his promises made to homosexuals during his campaign. He will garner some points with them even if she is rejected; however, if he does not push her approval to their satisfaction, he will plummet further in the polls.

Permissive pundits, politicians, and preachers will tell us that her lifestyle is not relevant to serving on the Court, but even some homosexuals disagree. If she is a lesbian, we Americans have a right to know because it will affect all of us for a hundred years.

Everyone knows that she is without any experience on the bench, and we know from her papers some of the positions she has taken. According to the known facts, she has spent a great deal of time way out in far left field.

Even some conservatives applaud her “honesty” but if she is so honest then let her reveal her beliefs on homosexuality. Frankly, I don’t want an honest homosexual justice even if she were a Tea Party conservative. Neither would I want her if she were an evangelical Christian (instead of being a Jew) if her lifestyle conflicts with evangelical beliefs.

She should be rejected whether or not she is a lesbian because of her radicalism. As Dean of Harvard Law School, she tried to prohibit the military from recruiting Harvard students because of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. Moreover, her comments and writings indicate that she has a political agenda strangely similar to Obama’s. Furthermore, her praise of a radical Israeli judge will no doubt be a part of the mix during the dog and pony show known as a senate hearing for a Supreme Court nominee.

If she is a lesbian, how will that influence her decision on same sex marriage? What about “Don’t ask, don’t tell” in the military? What about a church that fires a homosexual music director or youth leader? How about a Christian school that refuses to hire a homosexual teacher? What about adoption by homosexuals? How about foster parents? How will she stand when homosexuals seek divorce? Will a Christian bookstore be required to hire homosexuals?

If she is a lesbian, that is enough to vote against her. Any senator who votes to approve her should be kicked out of office by those who were stupid enough to vote him into office. That is not “hate” or “bigotry,” but my sincerely held religious views that I have had for a lifetime. Moreover, that view is supported by thousands of years of teaching of all major religions. It seems the only sin one can commit in our time is the sin of intolerance and I ask my critics to show some tolerance to millions of Bible believing Christians who believe that when two (or three!) people of the same sex climb in bed together, it is still an “abomination.” That is true for the powerful, the poor, the prosperous, the prince, the priest, or the pope.

If Obama had nominated a fundamentalist Christian to the Court (why are you laughing?), would there be any hesitancy to ask very pointed, even outrageous questions. “Do you believe that rebellious sons should be stoned?” “Do you believe the earth is flat?” “Do you educate your children at home?” “Do you believe in an ancient earth or young earth?” No one doubts the reaction of the senators if a Bible-believing and Bible-practicing Christian was the issue.

As an aside, would someone like to inform me why no one has ever discussed the possibility of an active, Bible believing Christian serving on the Court? After all, we are one of the largest demographic groups in America . In addition, should I remind you that we were the original founders of this nation? We have five Catholics, two Jews, a Black, and a Latino, so why not one of us? Anyone want to hazard a guess? Could it be bigotry? (Gasp!)

A lesbian on the Supreme Court? Incredible! America skipped into Sodom many years ago and it looks as if we may gallop into Gomorrah this week.

Copyright 2010, Don Boys, Ph.D.

Tel: 706 965 5930

P.O. Box 944

Ringgold, GA 30736

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives, author of 13 books, frequent guest on television and radio talk shows, and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. His most recent book is ISLAM: America 's Trojan Horse! These columns go to over 11,000 newspapers, television, and radio stations. His web sites are www.cstnews.com and www.Muslimfact.com.)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carpetmuncher; cryptolesbo; deiseldyke; homosexualagenda; kagan; koranair; lesbian; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last

1 posted on 06/30/2010 11:28:55 PM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

“Koran Air Flight 077 was shot down by Russian interceptors presumably killing all on board.”

Not sure I would want to have flown on Koran Air.


2 posted on 06/30/2010 11:31:12 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

It was ok to ask Clarence Thomas about his sex life, why not Kagan?


3 posted on 06/30/2010 11:32:26 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

Uhhh yeah, going after her sexual orientation. Like that’s going to be a real winning point of questioning....


4 posted on 06/30/2010 11:34:13 PM PDT by Tempest (I believe in the sanctity of life... As long as you can afford it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

I hope someone asks that question.


5 posted on 06/30/2010 11:35:35 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

How can she be a lesbian when we’re not even sure she’s a woman?


6 posted on 06/30/2010 11:35:35 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas

“It was ok to ask Clarence Thomas about his sex life, why not Kagan?”

There are no GOP Senators that are stupid enough to confront Kagan about being a lesbian.


7 posted on 06/30/2010 11:36:16 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

So she says yes. Then what?


8 posted on 06/30/2010 11:36:40 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
Koran Air Flight 077

Isn't that the plane that crashed into the Pentagon?

9 posted on 06/30/2010 11:37:10 PM PDT by Ezekiel (The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel

I have flown on Egypt Air, Emirates and Saudi Arabian Airlines.

No way in hell am I getting on Koran Air.


10 posted on 06/30/2010 11:39:38 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: max americana
How can she be a lesbian when we’re not even sure she’s a woman?

Nor are we sure about Obama's leanings.




11 posted on 06/30/2010 11:39:46 PM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

“So she says yes. Then what?”

Reject her/it!!!


12 posted on 06/30/2010 11:51:37 PM PDT by dalereed (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

“Fifty-five percent said they’re comfortable with an openly gay justice, while 40 percent said they’re opposed. Fifty-six percent said they could support an openly gay secretary of State, while 39 percent were opposed.”

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/89607-50-percent-say-theyd-support-an-openly-gay-president


13 posted on 06/30/2010 11:53:08 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

Ms Kagan’s sexual disorientation is the least of our worries. H-ll, I’d put Tammy Bruce on the Supreme Court in a heartbeat, and I’m not even sure she’s a lawyer.


14 posted on 06/30/2010 11:54:31 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

You cant seriously believe ANY Senator would vote to reject her based on being a lesbian..


15 posted on 06/30/2010 11:57:54 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Why did God destroy the “twin cities” ( not Minneapolis/ St.Paul)? Why did he instruct Lot to leave with his family and not look back?

Why would an elected official who held this to be a true revelation from God be “stupid” in your estimation?

I would consider it to be refreshingly heroic.


16 posted on 07/01/2010 12:04:38 AM PDT by One Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Why did God destroy the “twin cities” ( not Minneapolis/ St.Paul)? Why did he instruct Lot to leave with his family and not look back?

Why would an elected official who held this to be a true revelation from God be “stupid” in your estimation?

I would consider it to be refreshingly heroic.


17 posted on 07/01/2010 12:11:28 AM PDT by One Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
On a related note, there is nekked wimmins on the FR Yahoo backup site.

I went there and I SAW BOOBIES!

18 posted on 07/01/2010 12:13:54 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Why not ask her whether she thinks the federal government has the legal authority to force the states to accept homo “marriage”


19 posted on 07/01/2010 12:23:09 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: One Name

That lawmaker would be stupid because, for the most part, Americans do not care about Kagan’s sexuality.

However, the people do care about Kagan’s views and you GOP Heroes in the Senate lack the brass to vote against her.


20 posted on 07/01/2010 12:29:37 AM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

First, separate her sexuality from her radicalism. Then, dismiss her as a candidate because of the latter.

I am thinking about the late, great Allan Bloom, Ph.D. in philosophy, and author of ‘The Closing of the American Mind’, a wonderful book. He was a homosexual, for sure, but he knew very well where his political priorities lay. A clear, rational conservatism, understandable to everyone who took the trouble to study his ideas.

Bloom would have made a good judge. Ms. Kagan doesn’t. That’s my two cents from Holland.


21 posted on 07/01/2010 12:41:18 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I believe most Americans support traditional marriage and would prefer that perverse viewpoints did not become the social norms.

I do not personally care what the majority of voting citizens believe; that does not affect my position.

The prevaling media would have you believe otherwise, but that does not matter, either.

Is homosexuality a sin, or a choice?

If no one in the Senate makes a stand, does that mean it is not an issue?


22 posted on 07/01/2010 12:47:29 AM PDT by One Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

That is dancing around the question. Tell her “Are you a lesbian? Ask for a “Yes” or “No” answer.


23 posted on 07/01/2010 12:48:22 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

Just because he’s a good author, doesn’t make him a good judge. In fact if his private life was the fail you say it was, then he was a very poor judge.

Anyone who is in any kind of bondage like that is susceptible to manipulation from many directions. They are thus a liability in any position of serious authority.

With books, you get a chance to write, then edit, then perfect it while you are at your best. In leadership you don’t get that opportunity.

My experience is the Europeans have virtually no conservative media available outside of the Internet, and they are influenced by the leftist barrage that has been hitting them for their whole lives from television and newspapers, whether they realize it or not.

That said, I would have preferred Pim Fortuyn to win the election rather than the leftist-muzzies that killed him.


24 posted on 07/01/2010 1:08:12 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

The only gene pool Kagan will be in is on aisle 9.


25 posted on 07/01/2010 1:09:23 AM PDT by Tax Government (We ask nothing except that our elected representatives uphold the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

Appearance wise she would be more publicly presentable as a man.


26 posted on 07/01/2010 1:09:40 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

An absolutely stupid and irrelevant question.


27 posted on 07/01/2010 1:10:06 AM PDT by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
If she isn't a lesbian, she sure is doing a good job impersonating one. Why not just ask Kagan if she likes girls? Simple, and sweet. “Do you like girls, Miss Kagan? Let's tell the truth here.”

Why does it matter? It will make ALL the difference in her opinions. I believe that gay issues will be her top priority...her baby, so to speak. And this will be one more step of Obama’s change. He and the entire community of San Francisco will be doing a happy dance over this addition to the Supreme Court. Kagan will sail through because no one is willing to put their position on the line to question how she will lean on homosexual issues. The moral fiber of America will weaken because of her. Miss Kagan is a woman, but she does not represent the average woman..not at all. Her views about life are much different from the average American woman of any age.

Clarence Thomas was skewered over sexual accusations from ONE person with an agenda. And what she accused him of was ridiculous. That good man had to endure that humiliation along with finger pointing by no less than Ted Kennedy. Kagan will sail through without such terrible treatment.

28 posted on 07/01/2010 1:10:43 AM PDT by Swede Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

What the f***. This woman has never sat on the bench as a judge. If a seat on the Supreme Court is now an entry level position then administer a civil service hiring test for it and award the job to the first person that scores 100 points. I don’t care if she has sex with female kangaroos she is not and has never been a judge ... offer her a job in night traffic court and be done with it.


29 posted on 07/01/2010 1:14:18 AM PDT by Zauber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

You’re right it’s the one opportunity to do that.


30 posted on 07/01/2010 1:16:25 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: max americana

As Rush said, it’s not women that make her hot. It’s socialism (according to her college thesis).


31 posted on 07/01/2010 1:17:25 AM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

Who the hell cares who she sleeps with?!

You people are really going to complain about a lesbian when a leftist radical is getting the red carpet treatment right into the position of a Supreme Court Justice?

Are you kidding me?

She was appointed by a blatant anti-Constitutionalist (0bama), she has an awful record on freedom...

Once again, where is your GOP? Where is your representation?

Where is the filibuster?

Communists are winning in their bid to take control of the US, AND DESTROY IT, and you are complaining about what sex organ this subversive prefers?!

Unbelievable!

You are all going to regret not expecting more, not demanding more, and not having the guts and the willingness to fight these people.


32 posted on 07/01/2010 1:17:25 AM PDT by Boucheau (http://newzeal.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

I hope they all would!!!

Queers and lezies aren’t part of the human race!


33 posted on 07/01/2010 1:29:58 AM PDT by dalereed (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boucheau

You are right, the only people with any balls to do anything nowadays are the women.

The GOPhas ben “snipped”, eunachy, eunachy....


34 posted on 07/01/2010 1:35:10 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel

Freeper Barbara Olsen (BKO) was on the plane, AA flight 57, that hit the Pentagon..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Olson


35 posted on 07/01/2010 1:43:02 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave (To anger a Conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a Liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

OK, wise remarks. Well, Fortuyn would’ve been a candidate for blackmail, as a result of his private life, but anyway, he was a fresh, adventurous thinker, not afraid to voice his opinions.

BTW, as far as I know, his murderer was a radical Greenie/Leftie, but not someone connected with islam. He was diagnosed as having some form of severe autism/Asperger, which does, of course, not diminish the gravity of his deed. The killer was someone who, once an idea had taken his brain hostage (here: ‘Fortuyn is a danger to the poor and incapacitated’), he couldn’t get past that idea; it plagued him until that point in time where he’d got rid of the cause of that vexing thought.


36 posted on 07/01/2010 1:51:05 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

She looks Greek.


37 posted on 07/01/2010 2:02:54 AM PDT by wolfpat (Moderate=Clueless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cousin Eddie
"An absolutely stupid and irrelevant question." ------------------------------------------------

People who have sex with people of the same sex can not process real life and real issues through their minds correctly. They cannot think correctly, and same-sex sex is itself an indication of that.

That is what the Scriptures call, "a reprobate mind." (Romans 1:28 and context)

It will adversely affect her judgment in every area without exception.

38 posted on 07/01/2010 2:21:26 AM PDT by John Leland 1789 (Grateful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

She has never been a judge ... end of story in my book ...


39 posted on 07/01/2010 2:22:42 AM PDT by sushiman (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Tammy Bruce - very rare: smart brave lady

Kagan:, liar, deceiver, Communist bull d***

I’d support Tammy in a heart beat, but Zero wants a big fat ****** lesbian to help him turn the whole country into a third world Marxist pit of a hell hole.

Kagan replied: “I’m your man!

Partial birth murder of a baby: no problemo boss ...

I’ll just rewrite a few paragraphs and we’re there!!!”


40 posted on 07/01/2010 2:36:13 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

“not someone connected with islam”

it’s all the same enemy IMO.

“He was diagnosed as having some form of severe autism/Asperger”

I don’t believe that for a second. That sounds like the usual premise they push when a leftist/muzzie kills people, like the shooter at Ft Hood or anything. There’s always some excuse. It was an assassination, nothing else.


41 posted on 07/01/2010 2:36:57 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009
Mind if I rant?

At this point it's obvious that anyone Zer0 nominates for SCOTUS will be a hardcore leftist, so why don't the b***less Senate Republicans show this to the world? The fact that they can't stop her is irrelevant; Zer0 should be held accountable for his nomination. This is perfect chance to damage that Kenyan b*st*rd, and the Senate schmucks have pre-emptively surrendered. I'd say that they were thinking tactically rather than strategically, but I see no evidence that they are thinking at all.

< /rant>

42 posted on 07/01/2010 2:48:16 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

Of course it was an assassination, that’s not my point; nor do I want to exculpate the guy. But sincerely: if there had been the slightest indication that Volkert van der Graaf (his full name) was out to push the Islamist agenda, the press would have made good use of that; esp. since 9/11 was so vividly etched into our memories.

BTW if I am right the word ‘assassin’ stems from the Arabic language. Which is weirdly fitting.


43 posted on 07/01/2010 2:50:37 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

I completely agree with you.

That makes two of us.

Add in all our brave Senators and the total is

two.

I don’t believe a lesbian or a gay guy is appropriate for the Supreme Court, as their weird perversion also bends their outlook on life and law, their lives, and their honor if they have any ... does she hang out a bath houses? Public toilets? Likes Rough Trade? Many of the GRU and KGB spies from the 1930s were homosexuals. Wonder why. The Soviets know, one perversion means they are outcasts from their own society ...... and this means they are still acceptable inside the Supreme Court? Or as his or Hillary’s assistants? Reggie Love? Even Hillbuzz laughs at him.

Does everyone remember who raised Obama from age 10 to 18 ? A bi-sexual Marxist with a 601 page FBI file on all his Communist activities ...

Wonder why he loves “Gays Lex Bi-sexuals Trannies” so much.???

I know!

Let’s have the whole month of June dedicated to these people .........

Just like in 2009!!!!!!!!

Yes, our Senators should point out and show the world what Obama has done to ruin America

but they will not.


44 posted on 07/01/2010 3:07:33 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ayn And Milton

Kagan looks all of the senators in the eye and says she was not involved in the military ban at Harvard Law. Without a blink. she is pathological. And now will determine our speech, gun, and other rights for several decades. We are lost because Hatch, Graham, et. al. will soon be saying they admire her. and respect her.


45 posted on 07/01/2010 3:16:59 AM PDT by doosee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: One Name; trumandogz
I do not personally care what the majority of voting citizens believe

You should - especially in an election year. Her sexual preference, as distasteful as it may be to you personally, doesn't really resonate with the US populace as a whole NOR does it really matter to who will be voting to confirm this individual, the US Senate.

There are bigger things to worry about - really. Her being/not being a Lesbian will only give the Libtards a tool to hammer conservatives over the head with and that WILL play with the electorate in November. And no, no one in the Senate is politically deaf enough to try to make an issue out of it. Sorry to burst your little bubble.
46 posted on 07/01/2010 3:17:00 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (There is no truth to the rumor that Ted Kennedy was buried at sea.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cousin Eddie
An absolutely stupid and irrelevant question.

I don't care what she does in her private life, but it would certainly be instructive to see whether there is a core of honesty somewhere in her character. There is already reason to believe that core is rotten and hollow.

The way she answered the question would be interesting, to say the least. I don't think she's capable of giving a simple yes or no answer.

47 posted on 07/01/2010 3:19:15 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (For the first time in half a century, there is no former KKK member in the US Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: doosee

Cheers. It’s sad indeed: pathological people are always a few steps ahead, because they are perfect liars. Usually they pass the lie detector, and their skin conductance is not abnormal when they are telling an ‘un-truth’. They don’t sweat or blush whilst deceiving.


48 posted on 07/01/2010 3:38:07 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Good rant!


49 posted on 07/01/2010 3:44:07 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
“Ms. Kagan, Are You Now or Have You Ever Been a Lesbian?”

That really would have been an interesting question when you think about it. You simply ask the question. If a Democrat gasps at asking such a question you catch them. You can ask them why they are gasping. Is there something wrong with being homosexual??

People need to really understand the homosexual agenda. If you are fine with your sons and daughters being homosexual you are part of the problem. HOMOSEXUALS reproduce their kind by RECRUITMENT! They prey upon your children! That is the only way they can reproduce their kind. They are doing it through the political system and the media every day right under your noses. Kagan's appointment - with her judicial activism will be one more step towards their goal of forcing everyone to bow to the homo god.

50 posted on 07/01/2010 3:55:41 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson