Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Census worker taken to court for trespassing (interesting read)
Yahoo (AP) ^ | 7/5/10 | MARK NIESSE

Posted on 07/05/2010 9:13:44 AM PDT by DemforBush

HONOLULU – Census worker Russell Haas has come to expect a little resistance when he goes door to door to count the residents of the rugged communities near Hawaii's Kilauea volcano. He didn't expect to get arrested.

An attempt to get one resident, a county police officer, to fill out Census forms landed Haas in the back of a patrol car with a trespassing charge...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: census; hawaii; police
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last
Thought this was kind of an interesting case. Both for the state vs federal aspect, and also for some of the guidelines in the census worker's manual.

It's also kind of interesting to me that Hawaii has one of the lowest response rates to the Census.

1 posted on 07/05/2010 9:13:49 AM PDT by DemforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

They’re all out on the beach.


2 posted on 07/05/2010 9:19:01 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

I know a few people who have lived and worked there and have unkind things to say about the natives and their habits and the place in general.


3 posted on 07/05/2010 9:21:24 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (No matter where you go there are always more stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

The basic problem is when the government hates us, we hate them back.


4 posted on 07/05/2010 9:21:28 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (CNN:AP:etc:Today, President Obama's stool was firm and well-formed. One end was slightly pointed. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Our community has a local ordinance that requires solicitors to acquire a solicitation license before they solicit door-to-door. However, the city also provides residents with “No Solicitation” stickers for all outside entry doors if they so choose.

The city ordinance requires all solicitors to honor these stickers, meaning they are breaking the law should they solicit a house so posted.

I’ve been waiting for a visit from a census worker. I didn’t fill out my form completely. I’m waiting to show them the sticker on my door, and see just what the response will be (both from the census worker and my city clerk...whom I know).

I’ll not be answering any questions, and will demand the worker leave the property...


5 posted on 07/05/2010 9:24:26 AM PDT by bcsco (First there was Slick Willie. Now there's "Oil Slick" Barry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

The natives do not want to be Americans... they want our money but they want the rest of us to leave or only come as a short time visitor with a lot of money to leave there.

LLS


6 posted on 07/05/2010 9:25:57 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

The Census worker Haas was wrong to confront the citizen and refuse to leave! He should have just left the census form on the gate and made a note or what ever they do that the citizen had been contacted and a form was left at the address.


7 posted on 07/05/2010 9:26:35 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

This is an interesting case. Both parties are wrong to a degree.

The constitution does mandate the federal gov’t conduct a count of the people, so they do have the right to conduct the count.

However, that doesn’t mean they can violate our rights to conduct the count.

The census should be taken with respect to everyone’s rights and if someone refuses to participate the feds can choose to enforce it via the courts. They shouldn’t use mini-gestapo agents to try and coerce people to participate.


8 posted on 07/05/2010 9:27:34 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

The Census is supposed to be a count. Now it’s turned into a survey. Maybe we don’t want the stinkin’ Census “papers”. Just write down that one person lives there and move on. This is turning into a Gestapo operation. Not by accident I’m sure.


9 posted on 07/05/2010 9:31:44 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

It’s interesting that police hassled the census taker. If the complainant hadn’t been a fellow officer, they wouldn’t have bothered showing up.
I resent the governments over stepping it’s Constitutional authority, which says they have the duty to count people. Beyond the number of people that live at a residence, they don’t have the right to any of the endless other information they try to collect. It’s a bogus claim that that information is needed to allocate Federal money for any purpose. We already have Federal agencies and State agencies that have more than sufficient information from tax collection every single year. Schools have registration data, welfare departments, the list is endless.
So why do we waste billions of dollars on the census?
Politicians.


10 posted on 07/05/2010 9:31:50 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 507)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

A census worker is not a solicitor. They are federal employees, and have the authority to carry out their duties.

This case will be dismissed. I’m a pretty hard-core small government guy, but I don’t understand why anyone has a problem with the census. It’s one of the few things the federal government does these days that’s actually authorized by the Constitution.

If you filled out the basic information, you probably won’t be visited by a census worker.


11 posted on 07/05/2010 9:32:28 AM PDT by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

They’re not permitted to leave forms—all they have with them are forms which they must complete themselves—but they are also instructed to leave if someone tells them to and to be nonconfrontational in general.


12 posted on 07/05/2010 9:32:38 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

I agree that the census worker was too aggressive. He should have just marked on his list “non-cooperative,” and left it to his supervisors to deal with.


13 posted on 07/05/2010 9:34:40 AM PDT by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
A census worker is not a solicitor. They are federal employees, and have the authority to carry out their duties.

Our ordinance is written to cover anyone "soliciting" a residence, and census workers are "soliciting" information. As I read the ordinance, they are covered by the law.

I did fill out the minimal information based on what the Constitution requires. I'm not really expecting a worker to approach the house, but will turn them away if they do show up.

14 posted on 07/05/2010 9:37:42 AM PDT by bcsco (First there was Slick Willie. Now there's "Oil Slick" Barry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
I know a few people who have lived and worked there and have unkind things to say about the natives and their habits and the place in general.

I was there in the '80s (Kaneohe), drove all over the island, and came to the same conclusion. They were all envious of our wealth, but didn't want to work for it. "He's on Hawaiian time" was the mantra I heard all the time - it meant that someone was either hours late of didn't show up for work at all.

Beautiful-looking water, and I salivated at doing some fishing from the shore. I was told to forget it. At first, the natives were using dynamite to stun the fish, but that was killing everything and it was banned. So . . . they switched to dumping gallons of bleach to do the same thing - killed off everything including the coral.

That, and prominent signs to lock your car and hide your cameras left me with a sour opinion of the whole lot.

Gotta say though, that the mixed race girls, Asian + anybody else were stunningly beautiful.

15 posted on 07/05/2010 9:38:01 AM PDT by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Well they are only supposed to count people not take surveys of their entire existence, which is what the govt has been doing.
16 posted on 07/05/2010 9:39:11 AM PDT by Mmogamer (<This space for lease>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

I gotta agree with you.

Also, the left are all charged up to be counted as fully and as many times as possible. In contrast, our side seems to have a paranoia and rebellion streak as far as it is concerned, so they’re less likely to cooperate.

Then comes the reapportionment of districts and which team do you think wins out by their approach?


17 posted on 07/05/2010 9:39:28 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
Major logic fault here. The census keeps selling itself as a way to get federal money back. That is not the Constitutional purpose of the census/ How about never giving them the money in the first place?
18 posted on 07/05/2010 9:43:43 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Sometimes you have to go to dark places to get to the light....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

There are “long forms,” which are sent out to a certain percentage of people, but no one is required to answer all those questions; if they fill out the basic information, they won’t be contacted, as far as I know.


19 posted on 07/05/2010 9:43:55 AM PDT by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Chicago has nothing on Hawaii when it comes to the rules of local politics. If it is established that there are lots of Japanese, Okinawans, Indonesians, South East Asians, and Other Pacific Islanders, but almost no “Pure Native Hawaiians” left, then their political clout ends. The alliances and people passing as Hawaiians for the extra handouts would end. In a local society that claims “Aloha Spirit” there are more than enough closet bigots to go around.
Bottom Line they want the Feds to be like tourists. Show up leave your money and go home.


20 posted on 07/05/2010 9:54:37 AM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
Haas said he anticipated some resistance, especially from the area's Vietnam War veterans and marijuana growers.

Wonder what that's supposed to mean. Haas lumps vets in with pot growers?

There's always two sides to a story. I wonder if Mr. Haas conveys a bit of an "attitude" while performing his duties...

21 posted on 07/05/2010 10:06:20 AM PDT by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC

Haas, 57, a former New Jersey police officer


22 posted on 07/05/2010 10:10:09 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
... the left are all charged up to be counted as fully and as many times as possible. In contrast, our side seems to have a paranoia and rebellion streak as far as it is concerned, so they’re less likely to cooperate.

Then comes the reapportionment of districts and which team do you think wins out by their approach?

I've had a hard time with the attitude from the right on this issue. It's not as if Obama cooked this up by himself for some nefarious purpose. It's in the Constitution, for crying out loud.

I would have thought that the proper strategy is to count the maximum number possible and skip the number of toilets etc.

23 posted on 07/05/2010 10:10:32 AM PDT by Wingy (Don't blame me. I voted for the chick. I hope to do so again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
I don't have a problem with a census being taken - it's required by The Constitution. It's even been pointed out that less intrusive questioning is involved with this census than with those in the past.

But when the government illegally perverts the census by thumbing its nose at the law, like this one as no other, it's time to rebel.

24 posted on 07/05/2010 10:13:36 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wingy

Yeah, I’d really love to see President Palin and our Republican Congress shut down everything the census bureau does other than its Constitutionally-mandated decennial count.


25 posted on 07/05/2010 10:23:48 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

I’m not filling out racial information so that the government can use it to discriminate against me for being white.


26 posted on 07/05/2010 10:42:17 AM PDT by Politicalmom (A racist is a conservative who is winning an argument with a liberal.-FReeper Freespirited)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

>>”...but I don’t understand why anyone has a problem with the census.”<<

Evidently you didn’t get the “American Community Survey” from the U.S Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau that threatens you with jail time and fines if you don’t tell them how many minutes you drive to work, your mortgage payment, how much you pay for homeowners insurance, how much you pay for your water and sewer per month, how much you pay rent, whether you speak a language other than english, what type of health insurance you have, how many times you have been married, the highest degree or level of school you have, etc.

All true just taken from the form in front of me. Check it out and tell me if you’d comply? I won’t.

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/


27 posted on 07/05/2010 10:51:05 AM PDT by panaxanax (Keep plucking those chickens and boiling that tar. There's a party coming in November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wingy; fwdude

>>”It’s in the Constitution, for crying out loud.”<<

Wingy, see my post #27 and go to the link. These questions aren’t required by the Constitution, my FRiend. Not my Constitution, anyway.

This ‘questionaire’ is nothing more than a phising trip wanting to know everything about you and how many sheeple are stupid enough to comply. Maybe they’ll let us choose which gas chamber to march into? That’ll be the only freedom we have left before this reign of terror is over.

>>”...it’s time to rebel.”<<

We better do it before it’s too late.


28 posted on 07/05/2010 11:21:36 AM PDT by panaxanax (Keep plucking those chickens and boiling that tar. There's a party coming in November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
B Knotts: ...I don’t understand why anyone has a problem with the census. It’s one of the few things the federal government does these days that’s actually authorized by the Constitution.

panaxanax : Evidently you didn’t get the “American Community Survey” ... just taken from the form in front of me. Check it out and tell me if you’d comply? I won’t.

The Constitution authorizes an "enumeration," not a census or a survey. Enumerations are "counts" and therefore require no participation from those being counted.

So, unless you are in the export-import business and being questioned specifically about that business, you don't have to answer any Census 2010 or any American Community Survey Questions AT ALL.

And that's the real law.

Census 2010 and the Law

29 posted on 07/05/2010 11:24:44 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
FYI Post #29
30 posted on 07/05/2010 11:27:45 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

*


31 posted on 07/05/2010 11:56:23 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
Send it back and tell them you do freelance writing for $30.hr. You estimate the form will take up to two hours to complete.

When the from comes back with payment..... fill it out them.

I am not anyones slave.

32 posted on 07/05/2010 12:03:05 PM PDT by ASOC (Things are not always as they appear, ask the dog chasing the car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
I'm in full agreement with you. I only answered the first question, how many people, and the second, kind of a permutation of the first. That was all they got, because that was all that was required.

I was bringing up the fact that in addition to these questions being unconstitutional, the census is being conducted and compiled in an illegal, unconstitutional manner, becoming nothing more than a propaganda tool for the left. This administration is blatantly defying the DOMA law by counting homosexuals as "married" if they want to report as such. The activists are just beside themselves with glee over this overt flouting of the law, and will capitalize on the results to the max to push their agenda on all of us. The obsession with race and ethnicity is also a red herring for census purposes, and seeks to count, and, ultimately, amnestitize millions of illegal aliens as "citizens" of this country through a back-door scheme, something this adbomination seems to excel at.

33 posted on 07/05/2010 12:21:18 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
If you filled out the basic information, you probably won’t be visited by a census worker.

So what part of the information requested on the form is "basic information"? I filled out the number of people living at my residence and sent my form in. This did not satisfy the Census Bureau and I have been called and visited repeatedly. (And no, they have not gotten any more information from me.)

34 posted on 07/05/2010 1:00:57 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
Another aspect that's going to be rather disconcerting to any retired Hawaii cops in the future is that this involved a retired New Jersey police officer (the Census taker) and an off duty Hawaii county deputy sheriff (the argumentative citizen).

Ordinarily you expect for cops to extend traditional respect and courtesy to each other. Several retired friends of mine actually place their "retired police officer" IDs (issued by their former employers) on their visor so that anyone issuing them a ticket will see it in time to "stop" and make it a warning at worst.

I wouldn't expect Hawaii retired cops to get any courtesy at all anywhere else after this.

35 posted on 07/05/2010 2:09:56 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
The Constitution assigns the duty for taking the census to the federal government. In general state and local laws have no authority over federal law.

If the Founders thought it suitible for your little municipal sticker-ship to run the census they'd have given it to you in the Constitution, but they didn't.

36 posted on 07/05/2010 2:12:39 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
One of the really revolutionary events in the history of democratic self-rule was the requirement that a census be taken, and that it be done every 10 years.

There are nearly 200 other countries in this world to live in if you don't like it.

Start picking!

37 posted on 07/05/2010 2:15:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

“...you don’t have to answer any Census 2010 or any American Community Survey Questions AT ALL.”

And I won’t. We were visited once by the Census girl and I told her there are two people living here and don’t waste your time and taxpayer money coming back and hound us. Haven’t seen them since.

I will go to jail before I fill out the ACS questions. We’ve received our second notice and will most likely receive a third and fourth. So be it.


38 posted on 07/05/2010 5:34:55 PM PDT by panaxanax (Keep plucking those chickens and boiling that tar. There's a party coming in November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

As I said, we may see. But I know one thing; they have all they’ll get from me.


39 posted on 07/05/2010 6:31:37 PM PDT by bcsco (First there was Slick Willie. Now there's "Oil Slick" Barry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
The first Census ~ which actually was one of the first real censuses ever taken, provided sufficient information to derive:

1. Everybody's name

2. Everybody's marital relationship

3. Everybody's blood relationship

4. Who was or was not a slave (in every state)

5. What color you were

6. Your age (within a range)

7. Your sex.

8. Your employment

You mean to tell me you think you're smarter than George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and that you think you know better what America needs in a census than they did?

40 posted on 07/05/2010 6:53:10 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

Wow, I hadn’t even considered that angle. Thanks for the info!


41 posted on 07/05/2010 6:59:26 PM PDT by DemforBush (Serpentine, Shel! SERPENTINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

I answered my census form and answered only one question - Question number one, where it asks how many people live here.

Subsequently, about five weeks later, a census worker appeared. I told her I had returned it.
She asked how many people live here, and I said only one, and as far as I understood things, that was the only question I was required to answer.
She fiddled with her forms, went to her car, sat in my driveway for about five minutes and left.

They haven’t (so far) come back.


42 posted on 07/05/2010 7:00:43 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

“It’s interesting that police hassled the census taker. If the complainant hadn’t been a fellow officer, they wouldn’t have bothered showing up.”

I was thinking much the same thing when I first read the story. I question whether the police would have arrested the census worker had it not been a member of their own department making the complaint.

I also sort of wonder if the census worker, being an ex-cop himself, thought he might get some slack?


43 posted on 07/05/2010 7:02:17 PM PDT by DemforBush (Serpentine, Shel! SERPENTINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

LOL. Looks like you would be a good candidate to request the intrusive form from the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau division. Their phone number is 1-800-354-7271. Ask for form #ACS-1(2010)KFI. I’m sure they’ll send you one immediately.

Please post the source where you found the first census questions.

I re-read mine and didn’t see where they asked if I was a slave or not.

Evidently, they must have changed that....?

Go ahead and tell them how many minutes it takes you to get to work if you want or if you speak a second language. I really don’t give a sh!t. Walk into the ovens without resistance with the rest of the sheeple.

“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty”
Th. Jefferson

Baaaaaaa


44 posted on 07/05/2010 9:12:01 PM PDT by panaxanax (Keep plucking those chickens and boiling that tar. There's a party coming in November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
The things you don't know would astound you. The first census recorded exactly how many slaves several of my ancestors in New York state owned.

Later generations tried to scratch that part out ~ ignoring the fact that those ancestors lived on Oneida land and were counted as Indians themselves.

You look to the results to determine what was asked by the census takers. One other thing I didn't note is that the first census also determined what district you lived in.

45 posted on 07/05/2010 9:15:59 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

BTW, Jefferson designed and ran the FIRST CENSUS. Quoting Jefferson in opposition to a census is bizarre.


46 posted on 07/05/2010 9:17:05 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

A local ordinance does not supersede a Constitutional clause and the federal laws promulgated to exercise it.


47 posted on 07/05/2010 9:20:08 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

A constitutional clause means they have the right to come to my house to collect data. I have the right to refuse to give any data beyond what the constitution requires. I said “we’ll see”.


48 posted on 07/06/2010 5:15:56 AM PDT by bcsco (First there was Slick Willie. Now there's "Oil Slick" Barry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of world history. A census is in your favor. Not having a census always comes down in the favor of the tyrants who wish to enslave us.

If you don't wish to live in a free society then there are plenty of others where you can live and not bother the rest of us.

49 posted on 07/06/2010 5:24:36 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Have you called the Census Bureau yet?

Their phone number is 1-800-354-7271. Ask for form #ACS-1(2010)KFI.

I’m sure they will be delighted to have as many sheeple (that would be you) as possible give every detail of their daily lives to access at their will. YOU are part of the problem if you do not resist or question this invasive questionaire.

Again, please post the source where you found the first census questions.


50 posted on 07/06/2010 5:45:23 AM PDT by panaxanax (Keep plucking those chickens and boiling that tar. There's a party coming in November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson