Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disappointing (Sen. Brown R-MA Yes for Financial "Reform")
National Review Online ^ | July 12, 2010 | Stephen Spruiell

Posted on 07/12/2010 11:04:07 AM PDT by C19fan

Scott Brown will vote for the Democrats' financial-regulation bill, thus ensuring its passage:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Scott (R-MA) today issued the following statement regarding the Wall Street reform bill:

“I've spent the past week reviewing the Wall Street reform bill. I appreciate the efforts to improve the bill, especially the removal of the $19 billion bank tax. As a result, it is a better bill than it was when this whole process started. While it isn't perfect, I expect to support the bill when it comes up for a vote. It includes safeguards to help prevent another financial meltdown, ensures that consumers are protected, and it is paid for without new taxes. That doesn't mean our work is done. Further reforms are still needed to address the government’s role in the financial crisis, including significant changes to the way Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac operate.”

What replaced the bank tax? Deficit spending, and another bank tax.

(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: brown; financialreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Oh well.
1 posted on 07/12/2010 11:04:09 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Scott Brown never promised to be the next Sarah Palin. He is a vast improvement over Kennedy, and I am glad he won. However, I don’t look to him for conservative leadership.


2 posted on 07/12/2010 11:05:19 AM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

If it grunts like a RINO, smells like a RINO, and votes like a RINO then...........


3 posted on 07/12/2010 11:05:22 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

lulz, predicted such given his voting TRACK RECORD to date.

Give it a bit, the Scott Brown defenders will respond in due course....=.=


4 posted on 07/12/2010 11:05:56 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

For Mass he is on the far right


5 posted on 07/12/2010 11:08:24 AM PDT by misterrob (Thug Life....now showing at a White House near you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cranked

So this means he’s pro-quota I guess?

sad that there are states where this is the best that can be done (and he probably is the best that can be done from there)


6 posted on 07/12/2010 11:09:19 AM PDT by gthog61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Well.....anyone else losing all hope that he'll vote against Kagan?

Time to give Massachusetts back to the British.....or the Indians!

7 posted on 07/12/2010 11:09:50 AM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Remember that Brown is still a MAtard.


8 posted on 07/12/2010 11:10:35 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Unfortunately, Brown will have to do in the People’s Republic of MA. What we need is real conservatives in the red states. Conservatives should really be dominating the inter-mountain west, deep south and the plains in the Senate.


9 posted on 07/12/2010 11:10:39 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Anybody who truly expected better from this steaming pantload was naive.


10 posted on 07/12/2010 11:10:56 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

or even followership.

Brown’s claim to fame was that he was a self-described “independent” who would vote against Obamacare. He’s better than Martha Coakley would have been and sometimes that’s about all the choice we get.


11 posted on 07/12/2010 11:11:06 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It must meet with the approval of the big Boston banks.


12 posted on 07/12/2010 11:11:35 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Brown will regret this decision.


13 posted on 07/12/2010 11:11:35 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

The six New England states are overrepresented in the US Senate with 12 Senators all lib/rino types. N.E. should be one state with 2 senators, or better yet, their own socialist utopian country..


14 posted on 07/12/2010 11:11:42 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

What did you really expect? Duh!


15 posted on 07/12/2010 11:11:49 AM PDT by Circle_Hook (Lies, deception and payoffs will get you everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Brown will be a one termer. No matter who’s crotch he breathes into he still carries the Republican tag and when out of staters do not send him campaign money the Democrats in mass. will make him a one termer.

he is not a great dissappointment we never expected much, we didnt get much. I paid for that one vote, I got it.
I won’t be sending him anything else.


16 posted on 07/12/2010 11:11:49 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

On the bright side, he clearly has no aspirations to run for President.
Guess we’ll have to settle for whatever we can get before Massachusetts ejects him in 2 years.


17 posted on 07/12/2010 11:12:24 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gthog61

-sad that there are states where this is the best that can be done (and he probably is the best that can be done from there)-

You should see what the Ma GOP is running for governor!

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/10c/pride_week/baker.html

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/govt10/election10/tisei_spirit_mag/index.html


18 posted on 07/12/2010 11:12:45 AM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Anyone suprised by Browns actions in the Senate was in denial during the campaign, there was no doubt at all where he was going to legislate from.. While it was nice to keep 61 seats from the Dems and put an finger in the Eye of the Kennedy legacy, anyone who thought this guy was a ideological conservative was just not paying attention.


19 posted on 07/12/2010 11:14:19 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Very, very good-looking people are often beneficiaries of a sort of Affirmative Action. I’m beginning to think Sen. Brown is a dumb-dumb and has benefited from the phenomenon. At least he’s nice to look at...


20 posted on 07/12/2010 11:14:20 AM PDT by fullchroma (Bill Haslam for Governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson