Skip to comments.Personhood Mississippi responds to lawsuit against right to life and right to vote in Mississippi
Posted on 07/14/2010 10:08:25 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
ACLU and Planned Parenthood attorneys have filed an injunction against the Mississippi Secretary of State, seeking to disallow Mississippi voters from voting on the Mississippi Personhood Amendment.
Amendment sponsors and volunteers exceeded state signature requirements on February 17, becoming only the fourth successful ballot initiative since 1992. The one-sentence amendment reads, The term person or persons shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning or the functional equivalent thereof.
I find it ironic that the plaintiffs would wait until the first day the court is open after Independence Day, then file a lawsuit that seeks to continue the oppression of the preborn and deny the rights of over 130,000 Mississippi voters, commented Steve Crampton, renowned Liberty Council Constitutional Attorney.
In regards to the injunction, Lt. Governor Phil Bryant said, It is unfortunate that certain people would want to block the protection of innocent human life here in Mississippi by filing suit. Not only are they trying to stop pro-life policy but are also trying to deny the voters of Mississippi an opportunity to voice their beliefs on this issue. Those of us who believe there is nothing as important as protecting the unborn will continue to fight to give Mississippians the right to vote to end abortion in our state.
The ACLU has also joined forces with Planned Parenthood in Nevada, Missouri, and Alaska, employing similar tactics to keep Personhood petitioners and voters from exercising their Constitutional rights. In those states, despite costly delays, the courts have yet to issue a ruling.
As to the statement that we are redefining a fertilized egg as a person it has always been the practice of those who want to deny rights to others to use terminology to dehumanize them. There is no such thing as a fertilized egg, as the new life they are referring to is no longer an egg but a person with his or her own DNA, explained Les Riley, sponsor of the Mississippi Personhood Amendment. Further, The ACLU and Planned Parenthood attorneys allege that the one-sentence amendment modifies the Bill of Rights, yet the proposed amendment does not modify any section of the Bill of Rights, it simply clarifies to whom those rights apply. We are not in any way amending the Bill of Rights. We do not strike out, insert, substitute any words, or formally alter the current Bill of Rights in any way.
Continued Riley, This is clearly a preposterous lawsuit, intended to interfere with Mississippi citizens right to vote, and to protect Planned Parenthoods abortion cash cow. Planned Parenthood and the ACLU are seeking to protect Planned Parenthoods one billion dollar a year profit, while Mississippi voters are seeking to protect innocent life. We intend to fight this suit, defending our rights as Mississippi voters and the most basic right of preborn children, the right to life.
We won’t be denied here in our state by evil-doers.
Thank you. The ACLU isn’t popular here and its attempt to strip Mississippi voters of their vote won’t sit well with the justices/judges here.
I think justice will be done here for the unborn.
This was the hole in Roe v Wade...the Supremes refused to determine when life begins.
Somewhere down the road, Roe v. Wade will be argued again.
ACLU - Anti Christian Legal Union.
I double dawg dare them!
AIDS, drugs, abortion, empathy for terrorists, don’t liberals kill you?
You guys have no standing in this lawsuit. You are all just masses of tissue.
Go get ‘em Mississippi!
That is just a great license plate. . . go, go, go Mississippi!
Isn’t it great! I see them all over MS when I’m visiting home.
Bump your “go, go, go Mississippi!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.