Skip to comments.On being labeled as 'racist'
Posted on 07/15/2010 3:33:06 AM PDT by Scanian
A clear pattern of behavior has emerged over the last 16 months. According to liberals, if you disagree with their thinking, and if you disagree with the Obama administration, you are not only wrong, you are a racist.
The latest strike by the left comes from the NAACP, which has resolved that the tea party movement is inherently racist. At its most simple, this is a direct attack on the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans.
The NAACP has long history of liberalism and racism.
If you are a conservative including a conservative African-American there is no room for you at the NAACP. If you have opinions that differ from the NAACP and the liberal establishment, and if you are African-American, you are an Uncle Tom, a negro, not black enough and against our people.
In other words, the NAACP fancies itself the thought police for millions of black Americans. Disagree with them and you will be ostracized and attacked. You will be subjected to public humiliation and racist commentary from NAACP leadership. The message is clear: Tow the line or pay the price.
But the NAACP does not stand alone in this regard. The left has a long history of using the race card. It has been pulled on people across the political spectrum.
President Bill Clinton was smeared as a racist by the Obama campaign when Hillary Clinton was running for president. It seems that anyone who disagrees with the far left, socialist policies of Barack Obama and the current administration is subject to the heavy hand of the race card.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
I was called a racist when I voiced my intent to vote for McCain. A guy I know who actually is a racist and had previously used the quote “the blacks will take care of the Jews” called me a racist! It was his intent to vote for 0bama. I was floored that this guy who actually said racist things and who I really did not like called me a racist!
SEAN HANNITY: But Reverend Jeremiah Wright is not backing down and has not for years and in his strong stance on the teaching of black liberation theology is nothing new. He had the same things to say last spring when he appeared on "Hannity & Colmes:"
WRIGHT: If you're not going to talk about theology in context, if you're not going to talk about liberation theology that came out of the '60s, systematized black liberation theology that started with Jim Cone in 1968 and the writings of Cone and the writings of Dwight Hopkins and the writings of womynist theologians and Asian theologians and Hispanic theologians, then you can't talk about the black value system.
HANNITY: But I'm a reverend
WRIGHT: Do you know liberation theology, sir?
Malik Zulu Shabazz, chairman of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense (NBPP):
"We believe in a Black first philosophy and a Black Liberation Theology."
Although it [The New Black Panther Party] says it sees capitalism as the fundamental problem with the world and revolution as the solution, the new party does not draw its influences from Marxism or Maoism as the original party did. Instead, in a carefully-worded, roundabout form of ethnic nationalism, they say that Marx based his ideology and teachings on indigenous African cultures, and that the NBPP therefore need not look to Marxism or Maoism as a basis for their program, but can look to ideologies that stem directly from those African origins.
"The Justice Department originally brought the case against four armed men who witnesses say derided voters with catcalls of "white devil" and "cracker" and told voters they should prepare to be "ruled by the black man." ..."
One poll watcher called police after he reportedly saw one of the men brandishing a nightstick to threaten voters.
As I walked up, they closed ranks, next to each other, the witness told Fox News at the time. So I walked directly in between them, went inside and found the poll watchers. They said theyd been here for about an hour. And they told us not to come outside because a black man is going to win this election no matter what.
He said the man with a nightstick told him, Were tired of white supremacy, and he starts tapping the nightstick in his hand. At which point I said, OK, were not going to get in a fistfight right here, and I called the police....
"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly:
Black Panthers intimidate voters in Philadelphia with night stick:
If you disagree with the Obama and other progressive liberals you have been proved sane.
The reace card thing has been turned into a joke.
The naacp is a joke.
The word “racist” no longer has any meaning, especially when actual racism perpetrated by liberal blacks continues to become more well known to people.
Let ‘em play it, then watch what happens the day government isn’t there to back their thuggish behavior up with the law.
But it does have a soft spot for whitey child molesters.
No amount of money could change that freak from what he was.
Reading this it the story just struck me about J. Edgar Steele recently “disappeared” by big bro, and who is the the author of a book titled “Defensive Racism”....Steele has been for years labled a “racist”....
Related? Who knows....
Considering the scum that’s calling folks racist, I’m proud to be called a racist !
Of course it only works as long as whites play the game. Otherwise they can manipulate us anywhere they want too.
Racist a generic word that has no real meaning other than ‘bad person’.
Racist a generic word that has no real meaning other than bad person
bad white person.
“You’re a racist!!”
“And your point is...?”
I am sooooo tired of “racism”, teacher’s “contract talks”, the fight against obesity, the “war on drugs”, diversity education; I have been listening to this crap my whole life-literally-and as soon as I hear it, I STOP listening because it just means that whoever is talking has stopped using their own brain.
Uh oh, a rational article by someone not wearing knee pads for Obama.
The politico is doomed!!!!!
And your point is...?
I'd go with "So how much money do you want this time?"
Today, the label “racist” is applied to anyone who disagrees in any way with any liberal non-white or non-male (please note, that term is more inclusive than “female”), or with any policy advocated by any liberal (white males included, if there are any) that purports to serve the interests of non-whites and non-males.
As such it has lost its meaning, and we should stop fearing it.
Indeed, the act of applying the label has become the equivalent of shouting “I am a liberal statist!,” and serves the useful purpose of exposing liberal statists.
Never appear to agree with a liberal's taunt. Never.
Instead: counterattack immediately.
Do not pause to deny or even acknowledge the charge
Do not reflexively urinate over yourself in submission
Instead say: "You're a disgusting race-baiter. Martin Luther King would have spat in your eye. You racist piece of filth."
These people do not deserve your civility. They hate you. Counterattack!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.