Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS George H.W. Bush Hosts Namesake
Naviy.mil ^ | 7/15/2010 | Mass Communication Specialist Seaman J. Scott St. Clair

Posted on 07/15/2010 7:53:03 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), the Navy's 10th and final Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, received a visit from its namesake, former President George H.W. Bush and former First Lady Barbara Bush, while underway July 14.

Bush and Barbara were escorted on board by Adm. J.C. Harvey, commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command.

During his two-day visit to the aircraft carrier, Bush toured the ship, observing day-to-day operations and spending time with the crew, as well as taking part in a reenlistment ceremony for nearly 60 Sailors, which he said was an honor.

"I am proud of every man and woman on this ship," said Bush. "I was honored to be able to reenlist those who are ready to serve again. I am very emotional about service to country, particularly the Navy. I am very proud of the Navy and extremely proud of this ship. That this ship is named after me knows no bound in terms of my emotion and my pleasure and the honor that I feel."

Commanding Officer Capt. Chip Miller expressed what a huge privilege and inspiration it was to host two individuals who devoted their lives to selfless service.

"What an honor it is to have our special guests on board to see freedom at work first hand," said Miller. "We are so grateful to have them join us at sea to see what we do and how we do our part to defend freedom."

Barbara pointed out how much the aircraft carrier and its crew meant to her and her husband.

"This ship is probably the greatest honor that George Bush ever had given to him," said Barbara. "He and I pray for this crew every single night of our lives.

(Excerpt) Read more at navy.mil ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; cvn77; dfens; georgehwbush; navair; nimitzclass; usn; usnavy; ussgeorgehwbush

1 posted on 07/15/2010 7:53:06 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I wonder how much the ship’s basic design has changed since 1975?


2 posted on 07/15/2010 7:56:26 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


3 posted on 07/15/2010 8:00:10 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

There are many legitamite detractions one can make regarding the Bush terms in office, but love of country and it’s military are not among them.


4 posted on 07/15/2010 8:00:30 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Under his leadership, the Gulf War was a success.


5 posted on 07/15/2010 8:02:32 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: leapfrog0202
Have you wanted to donate to Free Republic, but:
Well, Bucko, today is your lucky day!!

FReeper leapfrog0202 will donate $10 on behalf of 15 people

FReeper RedMDer will sponsor 15 FReepers at $10 each

FReeper Verbosus will donate $10 on behalf of 15 people

You can remain anonymous by FReep mailing any of the following: Only your state will be displayed on the forum. Don’t be shy - only the person you FReepmail will know who you are. That’s it! Easy as pie! :)
6 posted on 07/15/2010 8:06:01 PM PDT by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discover" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

God bless the Bush family.

7 posted on 07/15/2010 8:09:23 PM PDT by They'reGone2000 (Not racist; not violent. Just not silent any more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: They'reGone2000

Same here


8 posted on 07/15/2010 8:10:08 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: They'reGone2000

Amen.


9 posted on 07/15/2010 8:16:57 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible; They'reGone2000

10 posted on 07/15/2010 8:17:16 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
I remember that it was almost universally accepted after the Gulf War that Bush made a right judgment in not removing Saddam. He stuck to the mission and performed excellently.

Then the Clintons got in and revised history and by the end of their term they had everyone blaming him for it. All because the Clintons didn't know what to do with Iraq so by the end of their term we had a disaster.

11 posted on 07/15/2010 8:28:03 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

My comment actually applies to both Bushes. There are many grievances a FReeper can hold against both men. Today, Karl Rove admitted the admin erred in letting detractors of the Iraq War get the upper hand. At least one problem with both Bushes was that they ignored the seditious media.

However, it had always been clear that the Bush family has had deep appreciation for the sacrifices made by the US military.


12 posted on 07/15/2010 8:28:03 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
A carrier aviator gets a carrier named after him. That has got to be a little overwhelming. God bless 'em all.

Nevertheless, a controlled crash onto a postage-stamp sized hunk of steel steaming through 30-foot waves is a really dumb way to make a living. IMHO. ;-)

13 posted on 07/15/2010 8:29:48 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible; Admin Moderator
My comment actually applies to both Bushes. There are many grievances a FReeper can hold against both men

Why are on this website if you attacking both Bushes? Your attack would be most welcome on DU.
14 posted on 07/15/2010 9:44:30 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Didn’t see this on the nightly news.


15 posted on 07/16/2010 6:43:08 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

16 posted on 07/16/2010 2:02:25 PM PDT by magslinger (If recycling makes cents as well as sense, I am all for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

Probably a lot.


17 posted on 07/16/2010 3:02:39 PM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

I wonder about the powerplant, but I presume that’s so tippy-top secret there’s no point in wondering.


18 posted on 07/16/2010 7:27:59 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I’ve got absolutely no problem naming a carrier after GHWB. It’s a tiny bit creepy to name something so prominent after a President that is still living... but beyond that it’s a fitting tribute to a man who devoted his entire life to the service of his country.


19 posted on 07/16/2010 7:35:32 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; All
Agree and agree.<

However, sorry but George H Bush is a rally cruddy name for an aircraft carrier.

20 posted on 07/17/2010 11:15:26 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; All
Agree and agree.<

However, sorry but George H Bush is a really cruddy name for an aircraft carrier.

21 posted on 07/17/2010 11:15:40 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

I’d argue that all US carriers should continue to be named after great American battles..... however, once the Congress started naming them for pols, I’m glad that there is a USS Reagan and a USS George W. Bush.

However, the idea of one of our great subs named for Jimmy Carter is a travesty, and when the ‘Rats push through a ship to be named for Bill Clinton and eventually for Barack Obama, what nausea will follow....

Much better to go back to naming carriers for Saratoga, Lexington, Yorktown, Midway, etc. The USS Independence was a great carrier name, too (my uncle flew A-4s from her for many years).

There doesn’t seem to be any hope for avoiding a USS Clinton and a USS Obozo in our future, though, with politicians in charge.


22 posted on 07/17/2010 12:21:41 PM PDT by Enchante ("The great enemy of clear language is insincerity." -- George Orwell --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
I’ve got absolutely no problem naming a carrier after GHWB.

Principled disagreement. (The kind we specialize in here on FR.)

One, naming ships of war after living persons is untraditional and a no-no.

Furthermore, I'm tired of the trend toward naming capital ships after political nabobs who lived out their lives in DC, like Carl Vinson and Mr. Bush. This is just wrong on so many levels. I can see naming a carrier after someone who championed the Navy and was once a Secretary of the Navy: Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt (with big, black asterisks denotated "Pearl Harbor/Back Door to War"), and James Forrestal are all good examples. John Lehman is a candidate in waiting, for having rebuilt the Navy under President Reagan.

But George H.W. Bush built down both the Navy and carrier air, and he did it because his topsider, Yacht-Club-preppie friends wanted tax cuts. We saw how that worked out in the Persian Gulf: if Saddam had just waited 18 months or two years, we'd have been completely unable to respond if he'd grabbed the entire southern shore of the Persian Gulf and had himself an execution party with all the emirs and their principal ministers.

Dwight Eisenhower was a great American leader -- but he was Army, not Navy. Sorry, I can't get behind naming a carrier for him just because he was a Republican President.

Carl Vinson was the embodiment of a rotten, alienated, corrupted, and politically and intellectually decadent political culture that embarrasses every day the original intentions of the Framers and the People who sent the Framers to Philadelphia to build us a better Union. People like Carl Vinson need to be remembered with garbage scows and honey barges, not 90,000-ton CVA's.

I'd like to return to the naming conventions of World War II, which parsed internally and made sense.

23 posted on 07/19/2010 7:41:46 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
There are many legitamite detractions one can make regarding the Bush terms in office, but love of country and it’s military are not among them.

I would not disagree with that. However, Republicans and conservatives need to come to grips with the tendency of GOP topsiders to want -- to demand on behalf of their penthouse-ridden, Old-Money-encrusted audience (using Jas. Q. Wilson political "technical term" here, "audience") -- that taxes be cut and the Army reduced to wooden guns and the Navy to few ships, fewer ships, and low steaming hours and lower ammunition budgets for training.

Remember what the U.S. military looked like in the 1920's and 1930's: That's what I'm talking about.

24 posted on 07/19/2010 7:49:34 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
A carrier aviator gets a carrier named after him. That has got to be a little overwhelming. God bless 'em all

I thought that it was kind of cool that when they did the island super-lift President Bush put his wings under the island and they are now part of the ship. For someone with naval aviators in the family I can tell you that parting with your navy wings before Saint Peter pins on the permanent set has meaning to them.
25 posted on 07/19/2010 7:56:25 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson