Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. Senate approves national popular vote bill
baystate banner ^ | Today

Posted on 07/21/2010 11:57:50 AM PDT by jessduntno

The Massachusetts Senate has passed a bill that would give the state’s Electoral College votes to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote.

The bill approved by the Senate 28-10 last week is part of a nationwide effort to secure the agreement of enough states so the winner of the national popular vote would be guaranteed to win the presidency.

The bill will not go into effect until states possessing a majority of Electoral College votes pass similar legislation. Maryland, Illinois, New Jersey, Hawaii and Washington state have approved the measure.

The House passed its version of the legislation in June.

The bill will now be sent to Gov. Deval Patrick.

(Excerpt) Read more at baystatebanner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii; US: Illinois; US: Maryland; US: Massachusetts; US: New Jersey; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; electoralcollege; electoralvote; electoralvotes; getoverit; gorelostalready; hawaii; howtostealanelection; illinois; maryland; massachusetts; nationalpopularvote; newjersey; powergrab; tyranny; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
How to step around the Constitution. We don' need no stinking amendments!
1 posted on 07/21/2010 11:57:54 AM PDT by jessduntno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

That’ll last until Sarah Palin, 2012.


2 posted on 07/21/2010 11:59:03 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Always refer to the Libs' new group as"ONE NATION, UNDER G-D!" That'll drive 'em nuts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Critics say the current system is not broken. They also point to the disturbing scenario that Candidate X wins nationally, but Candidate Y has won in Massachusetts. In that case, all of the state’s 12 electoral votes would go to Candidate X, the candidate who was not supported by Massachusetts voters.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/07/legislature_poi.html


3 posted on 07/21/2010 11:59:43 AM PDT by jessduntno ("Conservatism is the antidote to tyranny...its principles are the founding principles." - M. Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

This maneuver will give the voting power to the socialist laden urban areas at the expense of the Conservative rural areas.


4 posted on 07/21/2010 12:00:12 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

So why vote for President in D-Mass anyway then? So goes the national vote, so goes Massachusetts.


5 posted on 07/21/2010 12:01:06 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

This is all part of the mass amnesty plan. Once that happens, they’ll always win popular vote. And the republic is cooked.


6 posted on 07/21/2010 12:01:06 PM PDT by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Watch, Maryland will be next.


7 posted on 07/21/2010 12:01:14 PM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

So what’s to keep a state from just changing the law back and forth from election to election depending on the standing of their preferred candidate at the time.


8 posted on 07/21/2010 12:01:55 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

>> until states possessing a majority of Electoral College votes pass similar legislation

Never happen.


9 posted on 07/21/2010 12:02:18 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

If I were from Mass I would blow a gasket over this, as it might serve to make my vote irrelevant.


10 posted on 07/21/2010 12:02:37 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
The national populist vote that Al Gore and Rats love to brag about from 2000 differed by 0.51% between the two candidates (half of one percent) which would have necessitated a NATIONWIDE PRECINCT BY PRECINCT RECOUNT.

Dumb idea, New Englanders.

11 posted on 07/21/2010 12:02:43 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

100% nothing


12 posted on 07/21/2010 12:03:07 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

The people of Massachusetts no longer have a vote in the national election! Dumbasses!!! Can’t wait for the national vote goes to a Republican yet Massachusetts voted for a Democrat and Massachusetts HAS to give the vote to the Republican. Morons!!!


13 posted on 07/21/2010 12:03:56 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
The winner of the national popular vote?

Pardon me, but doesn't that substantially dilute the value of the votes of the very Massachussetts voters who are supposed to be represented by the Electors?

I mean, if you're a Massachussetts citizen, why even vote? The state's electoral votes are going to the winner of the NATIONAL popular vote, no matter which way Massachussetts votes as a state.

14 posted on 07/21/2010 12:04:10 PM PDT by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

>> Dumb idea, New Englanders.

“Chowder Heads”?


15 posted on 07/21/2010 12:04:33 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

so lemme see how this would work:

the state top vote getter doesn’t necessarily get the electoral votes. if the other candidate wins the national popular vote, then the mass electoral votes go to them even if mass popular vote goes to the other candidate.

no wonder they call ‘em “Massholes”


16 posted on 07/21/2010 12:04:45 PM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Great, that means the rest of New England becomes a colony to Boston. Sweet how that works. Too bad, NH, ME, VT, RI won’t go along with the Boston hustle.


17 posted on 07/21/2010 12:04:45 PM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Ummmm the electors’ freedom to vote for whoever they damn well please is enshrined in the US Constitution.

The first time this happens there will be a court battle that will make Bush vs. Gore look like a walk in the park.

Is a plurality good enough? So 34% of the popular vote can take all the marbles?

I’m glad that we have all of these modern genii who are SO much better equipped to architect an electoral system than those dead white slave-owning men.


18 posted on 07/21/2010 12:05:39 PM PDT by jtal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

If I were from Mass I would blow a gasket over this, as it might serve to make my vote irrelevant.”

If I were a betting person I would bet that almost no one in the news covers this and discusses its ramifications. I would also bet that less than a haldful of our so called educational institutions discuss it in any classroom.


19 posted on 07/21/2010 12:06:35 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
So what’s to keep a state from just changing the law back and forth from election to election depending on the standing of their preferred candidate at the time.

This is already what the crooks in the Bay state do to keep Democrats in office. Recall the changes to filling vacancies back and forth.

20 posted on 07/21/2010 12:06:58 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson