Skip to comments.
We're running out of internet addresses
CNN ^
| 07/23/10
| John D. Sutter
Posted on 07/25/2010 6:47:29 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
We're running out of internet addresses
By John D. Sutter, CNN
* We may run out of internet addresses in less than a year
* Internet addresses are assigned to all devices accessing the Web
* Researchers are working on solutions to avoid a new "Y2K"
(CNN) -- Don't panic, but we're running out of internet addresses.
Not domain names -- those website names that you see at the top of this page and which always start with some semblance of "http://" and "www."
We've got plenty of those.
But, according to statements from prominent internet thinkers this week, we may run out of internet protocol -- or IP -- addresses in less than a year.
IP addresses are numbers assigned to all of the devices -- computers, phones, cars, wireless sensors, etc. -- that log on to the internet.
According to the blog ReadWriteWeb, the internet is changing and evolving so quickly -- with so many new types of devices connecting -- that we're running out of numbers to assign to all of these Web-enabled electronics.
"The main reason for the concern? There's an explosion of data about to happen to the Web thanks largely to sensor data, smart grids, RFID and other Internet of Things data," Richard MacManus writes on that site.
(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: capacitylimit; hype; internet; ipaddress; skyisfalling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-61 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; ShadowAce; neverdem
2
posted on
07/25/2010 6:48:20 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
To: TigerLikesRooster
If government gets involved, expect the internet to crash.
If capitalist are allowed to manage this, the internet will live on forever.
3
posted on
07/25/2010 6:49:17 AM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
OMG!!!!! We need a new government program to fix this.
4
posted on
07/25/2010 6:49:48 AM PDT
by
Bryanw92
(Obama is like a rocket scientist....who's trying to do brain surgery with a hammer.)
To: TigerLikesRooster; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; ...
5
posted on
07/25/2010 6:50:30 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: TigerLikesRooster
“yawn” This was old news to IT people back when YK2 was “scaring” the masses... NEXT!!!
6
posted on
07/25/2010 6:52:53 AM PDT
by
Nat Turner
(I can see NOVEMBER from my house....)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I just read somewhere that they’ve discovered more IP addresses in a large deposit under farmland in Iowa. I think it’s someplace called TCP/IPv6. Easily recoverable.
7
posted on
07/25/2010 6:53:25 AM PDT
by
MV=PY
To: TigerLikesRooster
Windows 7 comes with new IP addressing:
Here’s min: fe80::2c20:acd4:f59a:6bxd%11
this is much different method. Not sure but I think there is a Squllion possible combinations with this approach
8
posted on
07/25/2010 6:53:29 AM PDT
by
BornToBeAmerican
(Give me a hand up, not a hand out)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I thought this is what IPv6 was created for.
9
posted on
07/25/2010 6:53:31 AM PDT
by
joseph20
(...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
To: TigerLikesRooster
A guy who was there when they were discussing how many addresses the internet would need told me they liberally guessed at about 30-40 — they only had a few actual subscribers. For other reasons, they went with 4 billion possible addresses.
To: joseph20
IPv6......Exactly. Wish I could have remembered it in my post
11
posted on
07/25/2010 6:54:51 AM PDT
by
BornToBeAmerican
(Give me a hand up, not a hand out)
To: Bryanw92
Yes! Let Obama take over the Internet!
12
posted on
07/25/2010 6:55:37 AM PDT
by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: Bryanw92
Obama proposing ‘ObamaNet’ legislation nationalizing the Internet in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2.. 1..
13
posted on
07/25/2010 6:57:05 AM PDT
by
vikingd00d
(chown -R us ./base)
To: TigerLikesRooster
14
posted on
07/25/2010 6:57:13 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: TigerLikesRooster
Sh!t. Now I’m going to have to dial the area code just to chat with my bride across the living room.
15
posted on
07/25/2010 6:59:56 AM PDT
by
brewcrew
To: TigerLikesRooster
I read somewhere recently, (I think the Smithonian Magazine), that at present there is 23 hours of video being added to YouTube every hour.
16
posted on
07/25/2010 7:03:34 AM PDT
by
blam
To: Bryanw92
"OMG!!!!! We need a new government program to fix this." Yup.
This calls for another $400,000 a year Black male internet address CZAR that reports directly to the president.
17
posted on
07/25/2010 7:05:56 AM PDT
by
blam
To: TigerLikesRooster
Calling Al Gore, you screwed up again.
To: Bryanw92
“OMG!!!!! We need a new government program to fix this.”
Well, if anyone can pull numbers out of their asses, it’s the goobamint.
19
posted on
07/25/2010 7:08:31 AM PDT
by
USMCPOP
(Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
To: BornToBeAmerican
20
posted on
07/25/2010 7:09:35 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
21
posted on
07/25/2010 7:11:57 AM PDT
by
Dubh_Ghlase
(Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.)
To: blam
22
posted on
07/25/2010 7:14:19 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: USMCPOP
Well, if anyone can pull numbers out of their asses, its the goobamint. After that post, there really isn't a reason to post any more on this thread. You said it all!
To: TigerLikesRooster
To: Dubh_Ghlase
And with IPv6 there will be enought to assign every person their own IP.
25
posted on
07/25/2010 7:18:51 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(It is Satan's fault)
To: BornToBeAmerican
a SqullionShush, you. Do you want Obama to find out what comes after a trillion?
26
posted on
07/25/2010 7:19:14 AM PDT
by
lowbridge
(Rep. Dingell: "Its taken a long time.....to control the people.")
To: Cboldt
Thanks for the correction.
When I began to post, I typed minute instead of hour then changed it because 'minute' seemed overboard and I just assumed my memory had failed me again, lol.
27
posted on
07/25/2010 7:20:00 AM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
--
I typed minute instead of hour then changed it because 'minute' seemed overboard and I just assumed my memory had failed me again --
Not just your memory, your sense that millions of people have upload rights!
FWIW, I thought you just made a "typo." Now you've gone and confessed.
28
posted on
07/25/2010 7:25:16 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: TigerLikesRooster
Ipv4 exhaustion
To: brewcrew
Now Im going to have to dial the area code just to chat with my bride across the living room. got eleven digit dialing already where i live ... across the lving room, next door, across the street ... everywhere
30
posted on
07/25/2010 7:28:24 AM PDT
by
TheRightGuy
(I want MY BAILOUT ... a billion or two should do!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
so, the Surveillance Society is about to crash the Grid.
Way to go Monkey Collective!
31
posted on
07/25/2010 7:44:28 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(The truth shall make you free but first it will make you miserable.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Take the unused blocks from companies that are hogging them:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ [iana.org]
GE - 3.nnn.nnn.nnn
IBM - 9.nnn.nnn.nnn
AT&T Bell Labs - 12.nnn.nnn.nnn
Xerox - 13.nnn.nnn.nnn
HP - 15.nnn.nnn.nnn
DEC - 16.nnn.nnn.nnn
Apple - 17.nnn.nnn.nnn
MIT - 18.nnn.nnn.nnn
Ford - 19.nnn.nnn.nnn
CSC - 20.nnn.nnn.nnn
Halliburton - 34.nnn.nnn.nnn
Eli Lilly Co - 40.nnn.nnn.nnn
Bell Northern Research - 47.nnn.nnn.nnn
Prudential - 48.nnn.nnn.nnn
UK Work and Pensions - 51.nnn.nnn.nnn
Dupont - 52.nnn.nnn.nnn
Cap Debis - 53.nnn.nnn.nnn
Merck - 54.nnn.nnn.nnn
USPS - 56.nnn.nnn.nnn
Defense has 7
That's 26 - more than 10% - that can be harvested.
But converting to IPv6 fixes the problem...
To: TigerLikesRooster
The sky is falling, the sky is falling!!!
To: Erik Latranyi
Oh, dud, you do know that the government was the one that made the Internet possible, after algore invented it of course. LOL, Actual it was a government communication experiment.!!
To: BornToBeAmerican
a Squllion And that's even bigger than a bajillion!
35
posted on
07/25/2010 7:53:15 AM PDT
by
PhatHead
To: org.whodat
Actual it was a government communication experiment.!!
To: HangnJudge
" The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is an agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of new technology for use by the military. DARPA has been responsible for funding the development of many technologies which have had a major effect on the world, including computer networking, as well as NLS, which was both the first hypertext system, and an important precursor to the contemporary ubiquitous graphical user interface." The DARPA funding started in the sixties.
To: Bryanw92
OMG!!!!! We need a new government program to fix this.You mean an IP Czar?
38
posted on
07/25/2010 8:06:25 AM PDT
by
varon
(Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
To: raybbr
No, that’s an IPv6 address, not a MAC.
39
posted on
07/25/2010 8:11:03 AM PDT
by
Darth Reardon
(Im running for the US Senate for a simple reason, I want to win a Nobel Peace Prize - Rubio)
To: Darth Reardon; BornToBeAmerican
Yes, I did a little research, checked ipconfig on my W7 laptop and, you're right, it is a IPv6 address.
I stand corrected.
40
posted on
07/25/2010 8:17:05 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: bmwcyle
Encoded in a chip in our foreheads...?
41
posted on
07/25/2010 8:28:11 AM PDT
by
Dubh_Ghlase
(Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.)
To: TigerLikesRooster; HangnJudge; ShadowAce
>
"The main reason for the concern? There's an explosion of data about to happen to the Web thanks largely to sensor data, smart grids, RFID and other Internet of Things data,"...But why, in heaven's name, would you want all such devices to have public IP addresses in the first place???
The real problem is more topological and organizational, and has to do with the fact that the internet is hierarchical for good reasons, such as security. A huge flat IP space is crazy, from a security point of view.
IPv6 is just going to mask the problem, not solve it. In some ways, it will just make security a lot worse.
'Scuse me, but IMO, what a pile of crap.
42
posted on
07/25/2010 8:32:39 AM PDT
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: Dubh_Ghlase
The chip company has a new invisible tattoo that can be put on the skin with a bar code also.
43
posted on
07/25/2010 8:38:04 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(It is Satan's fault)
To: TigerLikesRooster
And that's a bad thing because?.......................
I look at it like real estate grab all you can and when they run out ......sell.
44
posted on
07/25/2010 8:41:00 AM PDT
by
whence911
(Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
To: TigerLikesRooster; ShadowAce
Most devices that access the internet do so through company and ISP NAT devices(routers and firewalls) that use a single, or block of addresses. I believe this article is overly hyped.
The writer seems to be trying to give the impression that each and every device in use has a ‘public’ IP Address, and we are running out of addresses for all them.
45
posted on
07/25/2010 9:00:46 AM PDT
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: ShadowAce
46
posted on
07/25/2010 9:43:10 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(..Liberalism is Intolerance..- - Freeper Eric in the Ozarks)
To: HangnJudge
If you were running for over 15 years straight, you’d be exhausted too....
47
posted on
07/25/2010 9:50:54 AM PDT
by
mikrofon
(How can I have a Mac address if I don't own an Apple? ;)
To: raybbr
No Problem. That isn’t exactly my IP address for security reasons.
48
posted on
07/25/2010 10:08:57 AM PDT
by
BornToBeAmerican
(Give me a hand up, not a hand out)
To: TigerLikesRooster

iirc, newer chip sets will reveal their S/N
unless the IP protocol prevents it, is it possible or is it a bad thing to use chipset S/N's ???
49
posted on
07/25/2010 10:12:58 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: KoRn; TigerLikesRooster; ShadowAce
>
Most devices that access the internet do so through company and ISP NAT devices(routers and firewalls) that use a single, or block of addresses. I believe this article is overly hyped. The writer seems to be trying to give the impression that each and every device in use has a public IP Address, and we are running out of addresses for all them. Precisely.
They've been flogging and hawking IPv6 for a long time and basically nobody cares to adopt it because it's a pain in the rear, and it's a solution in search of a problem.
The only reason we might want IPv6 is if we wanted every device in the world to have a public IP address. Apparently some people think that's a good idea.
It's nuts.
50
posted on
07/25/2010 10:15:28 AM PDT
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson