Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US condemns massive leak of Afghan war files
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 7/25/10 | Kerry Sheridan

Posted on 07/25/2010 8:53:56 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The White House denounced a massive leak of secret military files that allegedly describe how Pakistan's spy service aids the Afghan insurgency, but said the information was no surprise.

In all, some 92,000 documents were released by the web whistleblower Wikileaks, containing previously untold details of the Afghan war through Pentagon files and field reports spanning from 2004 to 2010.

According to the New York Times, one of the first three media outlets to review and report on the leaks, they "suggest that Pakistan, an ostensible ally of the United States, allows representatives of its spy service to meet directly with the Taliban."

Britain's Guardian newspaper said the files, many of which detail growing numbers of civilians dying at the hands of international forces as well as the Taliban, painted "a devastating portrait of the failing war in Afghanistan."

The White House issued its condemnation shortly before the leaks were posted online, saying the information could endanger US lives but also pointing to the administration's long-held doubts about links between Pakistan intelligence agents and Afghan insurgents.

"The United States strongly condemns the disclosure of classified information by individuals and organizations which could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security," said White House National Security Advisor James Jones.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghan; afghanistan; condemns; isi; massiveleak; warfiles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Track9

IMHO, it’s much more likely a unilateral ploy to avoid accountability, while providing justification for actions supporting ulterior motives.


21 posted on 07/25/2010 10:18:07 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
IMHO, it’s much more likely a unilateral ploy to avoid accountability, while providing justification for actions supporting ulterior motives.

That makes sense but could you elaborate a bit..?

22 posted on 07/25/2010 10:26:27 PM PDT by Track9 (Liberals are cruel hateful people who think they pass as respectable citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Track9

http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers40/paper3902.html

An opinion you might find interesting.


23 posted on 07/25/2010 10:40:35 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Track9

If the White House were serious about the war, the last thing one would do is to use the press to identify am information leak. Obviously the only leak is to intentionally release the information and now that it has been leaked to further draw attention to the information.

The entire McChrystal affair was contrived. McChrystal’s bio manifests a short tracked career with multiple command billets at less than 2yr billet assignments throughout his career. He had been fast tracked and groomed ever since West Point and his performance at West Point indicates he wasn’t chosen to be groomed based upon superior performance or capacity. He was capable and had made 4 stars and knew the operations of the theater and was obedience to civilian control, evidenced in his behavior and planning.

The mechanics of his departure were associated with painting Hillary in a favorable light, while giving an impression of Obama as a person capable of standing his ground, intentionally or not.

IMHO, his departure is probably more associated with an operational milestone in maneuver warfare at the political, economic, and cultural levels. It didn’t have anything to do with past military planning or operations at the tactical or operational levels. It’s been orchestrated and planned for other reasons.


24 posted on 07/25/2010 10:59:49 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BARLF
The United States lack of success in its war strategy in Afghanistan primarily arises in military imperatives being subjugated to US political compulsions – both external and domestic. In the process US military commanders have stood stymied in their pursuit for decisive results.

I would tend to agree with this conclusion as it's not hard to imagine Holbrooke and his crew obstructing at every level.

25 posted on 07/25/2010 11:20:27 PM PDT by Track9 (Liberals are cruel hateful people who think they pass as respectable citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

The “White House” shouldn’t be “denouncing” it. They should be throwing these a**holes in prison for treason.


26 posted on 07/25/2010 11:52:51 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Ich bin ein illegal alien! - Barry Obama standing up with Central and South America against Arizona.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
Let’s see how they charge the little liberal POS Army Spec 4 that passed them to Wikileaks.

I'm wondering how that SPC managed to pass those files to WikiLeaks.

If they were on the classified net, his usb drives should be disabled. If he downloaded them on to a CD or DVD, the program used to download the information will only allow the information to be viewed on a computer with a similar or higher security rating.

All in all, it sounds like the ComSec system at that location needs to be looked at.

27 posted on 07/26/2010 2:52:27 AM PDT by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

SECRET papers were “leaked” under Obama’s watch. The media uses “what is leaked” for fueling ratings ... but YOU and I are concerned about the LEAK. Who would do this? Who would put the lives of our troops in danger for self-aggrandizement? The focus should be on the leak, not what is “leaking”.


28 posted on 07/26/2010 4:47:45 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (http://www.thepatriotsflag.com - The Patriot's Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The White House denounced a massive leak of secret military files.

Funny ain't it.
The commieRATS had no problem with 'leaks of secret military files' when Dubya was POTUS. Now that 'the foot is on the other shoe', they don't like it.

That's ... Schadenfreude ... for ya baby!

29 posted on 07/26/2010 5:02:25 AM PDT by Condor51 (SAT CONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
Maybe I'm missing something here but wikileaks knowingly divulged classified information. Why isn't the FBI arresting the owner of the site? Isn't this treason? The army guy should be hung.
30 posted on 07/26/2010 5:11:26 AM PDT by RadiationRomeo (Step into my mind and glimpse the madness that is me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RadiationRomeo
National security integrity has been thoroughly and wantedly comprimised by Obama operatives. The press calls this a "leak" when they all know it it a FEED.

Military boots in Afganistan; games up.

31 posted on 07/26/2010 5:19:17 AM PDT by Broker (Psalm 109)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

The White House most likely collated and filtered the “leak” and probably provided a media kit to go along with it.


32 posted on 07/26/2010 11:38:32 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If the leaks published in the NY Times paint an accurate picture, the mission in Afghanistan is FUBAR.
33 posted on 07/26/2010 11:58:41 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

The “leaks” go right up to when 0bama declared a new approach. They clearly indicate that problems are Bush’s fault.

I bet a new report shows a massive improvement since then!

I also think that this is a prelude to war crimes trials for everyone but 0bama and his regime, just in time for the November elections, what a distraction! Remember, 0bama’s people flirted with the concept during the election.


34 posted on 07/26/2010 1:50:13 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
It’s coming to the USSA!!!

It's already here, brought to us by Broke Insane Yomama! ! ! !

35 posted on 07/26/2010 7:45:29 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (EPA will rule your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER

WORD, dude!!! WORD!!!


36 posted on 07/26/2010 7:47:10 PM PDT by SierraWasp ("Contempt of Congress" used to be a minor crime. Now it's a badge of honor!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson