Posted on 07/28/2010 12:44:55 PM PDT by Marty62
Judge Napolitano just reported that he has had an interview with Julian A of W@ikileaks. JA told him that he gave the docs to the White House for response two (2) weeks ago. Never receive a response.
White House approved of Security Breach? Who at the WH received the Docs and who else did they give access to the docs?
Somebody’s going to prison..................
This caught my attention, even after Napolitano started acting like his sister and defended the AZ judges pro-Illegal Alien ruling (grab the US Code, Janet...er Andrew)
If this is true....then the White House tactically approved this for release....if they knew about it beforehand
A reason to shuffle off the CEO to Russia and get those Russian Spies out of the country on the quick.
A reason to shuffle off the CEO to Russia and get those Russian Spies out of the country on the quick.
A reason to shuffle off the CEO to Russia and get those Russian Spies out of the country on the quick.
The traitors flipped through the leaks, saw it would only embarrass W and not come much into Bambi’s term, and said full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes! The H w/National Security, Safety of Troops and Sources of Intel.
Paging Drudge!
The Judge is not related to ‘Janet’. . .
The Judge is not related to ‘Janet’. . .
TREASON
This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance.
The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Johnathan Hunt mention this earlier, while I was trying to find his story the Judge came on and verified it. He said the WH has not returned his request for comment. All the White House Blind mice attorneys are trying to figure a way out. The NYT’s has been running cover for the Wh by saying THEY vetted the docs with the WH.
SOMEONE IS LYING. Did read some British person sying that either they were leaked OR SOMEONE HACKED THE DOD.
Silence is consent.
Most likely an inside (the WH) job............
The Judge is not related to ‘Janet’.
Could have fooled me. Janet, er, Andrew sounds more and more like a Liberal every day. I guess this is expected for MS Fox News
Once Afghanistan resumes it's position as the main friendly homeland for al Qaeda and other terrorists groups, Obama wants to pretend it's not his fault.
Although he probably will try to figure out how to take the personal "credit" from the terrorists groups themselves.
Especially their complicity in the NYT’s release. The NYT’s reporters tried to claim all the due diligence of “Journolists”. BS, it was a WH/NYT/Wikileaks rocket aimed at our troops.
ping to
btt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.