Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamacare reversal? House 75% of the way there!
WND ^ | 7/28/2010 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 07/29/2010 1:04:54 PM PDT by Qbert

One of the biggest targets should the GOP regain control of either the U.S. House or Senate in November's elections, according to many polls, will be Obamacare, the president's plan that effectively nationalized the decision-making process for health-care issues.

But a little-reported move to begin demolition of the health-care system takeover already is pending in the House and has gained about three-quarters of the support it needs to repeal the law that demands citizens buy insurance or pay financial penalties.

As of last night, the discharge petition sponsored by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, had collected 162 signatures of the 218 it would need to advance – even in the face of continued opposition from Obamacare promoter House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Under the provisions of the discharge procedures in the House, such a move is required to have the support of 218 members, a majority, of the 435-member chamber before moving forward.

But since it requires a majority, it is virtually assured of approval once it reaches the point of being advanced.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: obamacare; repeal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 07/29/2010 1:04:59 PM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Of interest? ——> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2561117/posts

=.=


2 posted on 07/29/2010 1:06:47 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: None

you dont need half, you need 2/3 to overcome a certain Obama veto.If the House and Senate repeal in 2011, then Obama should be notified that elections have consequences.


3 posted on 07/29/2010 1:08:32 PM PDT by Sporaticus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked

OBAMACARE must be rescinded!!


4 posted on 07/29/2010 1:09:05 PM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Yeah, then they’ll need to do another one of these for that...


5 posted on 07/29/2010 1:09:33 PM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Steve King sure has been a dynamo in standing against BO and his minions in Congress.

We need a few more in there just like him!


6 posted on 07/29/2010 1:10:25 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Never trust anyone who points their rear end at God while praying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

If the GOP retakes the House, they need to put repeal of 0bamacare into the 2012 Budget Act. After all, wasn’t it “budget reconciliation” that begat this monster?

So, put it in the budget, and if the Dems don’t like it, they get no budget.

Ahhh...if only the GOP had the balls....


7 posted on 07/29/2010 1:10:35 PM PDT by henkster (A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

This is all well and good but in the end the people will have the final say as to how they are governed. Obamacare is unconstitutional since Article 1 Section 8 does not specifically list regulating health care as an enumerated power. The people are not bound by an unconstitutional act.


8 posted on 07/29/2010 1:12:17 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

9 posted on 07/29/2010 1:14:36 PM PDT by Bean Counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“The people are not bound by an unconstitutional act.”

Well, unfortunately that’s up to the courts to decide. And judges can really mess up sometimes- as we all learned yesterday in Arizona.


10 posted on 07/29/2010 1:15:06 PM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
Well, unfortunately that’s up to the courts to decide.

No, it's up for the people to decide. They have the final say as to how they will be governed!
11 posted on 07/29/2010 1:16:18 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Rep Steve King is MINE are none of you can have him!


12 posted on 07/29/2010 1:19:28 PM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Yes!

218+
is what we need!


13 posted on 07/29/2010 1:21:12 PM PDT by PATRIOT1876 (Language, Borders, Culture, Full employment for those here legally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Yes!

218+
is what we need!


14 posted on 07/29/2010 1:21:26 PM PDT by PATRIOT1876 (Language, Borders, Culture, Full employment for those here legally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

they better do something...my mothers hospice service acts like the patients are the enemy


15 posted on 07/29/2010 1:22:35 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

“Rep Steve King is MINE are none of you can have him!”

But, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. :-)


16 posted on 07/29/2010 1:24:51 PM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sporaticus
...you need 2/3 to overcome a certain Obama veto....

Yes but only need 218 to defund. he he he

17 posted on 07/29/2010 1:25:03 PM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
No, it's up for the people to decide. They have the final say as to how they will be governed!

The tyrants, oligarchs and ruling class have a say on how the people want will be governed. If you were trying to De tocqueville-esque you stumbled badly into cliche land. The people having the power is a fleeting thing and we lost that oh about the time of Teddy Roosevelt. Depend on you own wits and resources and Jesus, depending on the wisdom of your fellow citizen and them having your zeal for an adherence to the constitution is folly.

18 posted on 07/29/2010 1:27:21 PM PDT by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

I would expect it to get to 178 Republicans and then you need 40 Democrats. That’s a lot of potential campaign ads against Dems who refuse to sign on.


19 posted on 07/29/2010 1:27:30 PM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sporaticus
you dont need half, you need 2/3 to overcome a certain Obama veto

Don't tell WND that, they hate it when facts ruin their articles.

20 posted on 07/29/2010 1:30:31 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson