Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Democrats are Pushing the $165 Billion Union Pension Bailout ^ | 07/30/10 | LaborUnionReport

Posted on 07/30/2010 9:22:30 AM PDT by goldendays

Why Democrats are Pushing the $165 Billion Union Pension Bailout

by LaborUnionReport

Somewhere lurking in the hot, putrid halls of Congress this summer is a union bailout bill of epic proportions and long-term ramifications. Whether or not Democrats can ultimately push it (or something like it) into passage is yet to be determined. However, with rumors that Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) signed on as a co-sponsor on Thursday, it would appear that the union bailout is quietly creeping along.

If it passes, though, its ramifications surpass the mere $165 billion-plus price tag, as it will influence the political landscape for decades to come. In sum, Democrats need the bailout desperately and Republicans should shun it like the plague.

Likely to surpass the touted $165 billion it is estimated to cost, Create Jobs and Save Benefits Act (S. 3157) was introduced on March 23rd by Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) and is designed to bailout unions’ underfunded pension funds by transferring the liability of those funds onto the backs of the taxpayers.

Under these bills, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) would, at the request of the plans, have the authority to take over the pension obligations of employers who have withdrawn from the plans, and pay the benefits out of taxpayer dollars, says Furchtgott-Roth:

Once the PBGC shoulders that obligation, it would keep making payments until the last retiree or designated survivor dies.

Since many multiemployer plans are in financial difficulty, this legislation, if enacted, could dramatically increase the federal deficit, putting even more pressure on the American taxpayer and the economy. Depending on events, it might add billions to government spending — current underfunding levels are estimated at $165 billion-bumping up future deficits.

According to a June 24th article published in the Bureau of National Affairs Construction Labor Report

If enacted into law, the bill would convert a private funding shortfall for collectively bargained multi-employer plans into a public obligation, said Brett McMahon, vice president of Miller and Long Concrete Construction and an ABC member.

The legislation would transfer a portion of multiemployer pension funding obligations to a new insurance program that would be operated by the PBGC and paid for with taxpayer dollars instead of employer-paid premiums, F. Vincent Vernuccio, a spokesman for the trade group’s advocacy organization, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said during the call.

At the heart of the union pension problem are companies that, in many cases, agreed to put retirement money for union workers into “multi-employer plans” but have since gone out of business. As the unionized workers in multi-employer plans are still entitled to a pension, the remaining employers are left funding the pensions of workers who, in many cases, they never employed.

Over the past few decades, as more and more unionized companies have gone out of business, this ponzi-scheme has only grown, leaving many union pensions severely underfunded—an estimated $165 billion underfunded. Now, with so many plans in critical status, many companies that remain in union multi-employer plans are facing an insurmountable burden that may eventually drive many of them out of business.

What’s Really Behind the Democrats’ Push for the Union Pension Bailout

Liberal talk-show host Ed Schultz proclaimed last weekend that America is in an ideological fight for the country. The problem for many on the Right is that they are only beginning to understand that the Left’s vision for America is a long-range vision—and it is a fight where the Left is playing for keeps.

Democrats need unions to be their foot soldiers on the march to a socialized progressive America which is why the entire Left establishment has been pushing for the horrifically-misnamed Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) for the better part of a decade.

In fact, at 2009’s Netroots Nation (the left-wing blog event for socialist progressive bloggers), one of the panel discussions held was The Secret Plan to Defeat the Right Forever and how EFCA was key to the plan’s success. Modernizing the nation’s labor law is critical to expanding union membership—which in turn, will ensure conservatives become a permanent minority, as newly-empowered workers actively engage in political action and demand a new way of doing the nation’s business, like creating an economy that rewards Main Street and not just Wall Street.

The freedom to form unions and bargain is critical to the progressive movement—when workers have the tools they need to build a better life, they have the power to improve their communities and the solidarity to make progressive political change throughout the nation. In other words, the Left has been relying on EFCA in order to have one-party rule in America permanently. The problem is, EFCA has been temporarily stalled and now the train-wreck of union pensions is barreling down on the Democrats.

In order to save the Democratic Party, they must save the unions (or more specifically, the unionized companies) from failing. While Democrats will tout the union pension bailout bill as another way to “create or save jobs,” it is misleading. The union pension bailout bill will save Democrat politicians’ jobs and it may also temporarily save some union jobs, but at what expense?

There are no guarantees that bailing out the union pensions at the expense of taxpayers will save the unionized companies. Moreover, if the union companies are allowed to fail, the markets and industries that these companies operate in will likely absorb the work, creating jobs in other (albeit non-union) companies. On the other hand, even though Democrats know that another union bailout will likely make them even bigger pariahs with the American people, the very survival of their party rests on their ability on passing this poisonous piece of legislation.

If they fail, the ramifications for the Democrats are disastrous. Failing to bailout the union pensions would likely cause the failure of a fairly high number of unionized employers. If unionized employers fail, unions will lose members. Without union members, unions would have no union dues with which they can fund Democrats’ political campaigns and would not be able to mobilize effective Get Out the Vote (GOTV) efforts.

There are a couple of reasons Democrats and their union handlers are pushing this poisonous bill now: Union bosses and Democrats know there is likely going to be a major upheaval in November. As a result, what they have not been able to accomplish in the last 18 months in Washington will presumably be stalled for another few years (at least until 2013).

They cannot survive that long. The union pension bailout bill is the lifeline to ensure their survival until they can regain dominance again.

In the coming months, watch for more push from the Democrats to bailout the union pension plans. If it doesn’t happen before the mid-term elections, it could very well happen immediately after.

However, for any Republicans considering supporting this legislation, they do so at their own peril, for the Democrats are only pushing this to save their party by making sure they have foot soldiers in future elections.


“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2010election; 2010midterms; aflcio; bailout; bho44; bustunions; congress; corruption; democratcorruption; democrats; dnc; economy; efca; electionfraud; elections; fail; gotv; liberalfascism; liberalprogressivism; liberals; lping; money; obama; obamabrownshirts; pension; pensions; progressives; s3157; seiu; socialism; taxcheatparty; taxes; union; unionbailout; unioncorruption; unionpensions; unions

1 posted on 07/30/2010 9:22:34 AM PDT by goldendays
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldendays

I don’t see them bailing me out.

People need to strike. We’re going to have to shut this government down if they keep this bs up.

2 posted on 07/30/2010 9:26:58 AM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldendays
I don't understand why someone has to tell us “Why”? We all know exactly why!
3 posted on 07/30/2010 9:33:30 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldendays

The dems are completely out of control! The republicans should get out in front of this crap.....and tell the American people what these commies have planned. Next stop is our 401’s and retirement accounts to finance union bailouts.

4 posted on 07/30/2010 9:36:07 AM PDT by penelopesire (FOX NEWS TRIBAL PRINCESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldendays

Over the past two decades, unions have lifted money from their pension funds and deposited that money into DNC coffers. A federal bailout will allow unions to shore up those pension accounts while at the same time allowing taxpayers to fund (at the point of a gun) Democrat candidate elections.

5 posted on 07/30/2010 9:36:22 AM PDT by Hoodat (.For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

The unions were the democrap party slush fund for elections, and now that dems control all, they are going to ‘re-capitalize’ their shills. What really frosts me is that companies allowed the union thuggery to extort so much from their businesses knowing it was going to be redirected to the democrap candidates!

6 posted on 07/30/2010 9:36:38 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Dem voters, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldendays

I don’t need to read past the headline as to why. Unions = votes.

7 posted on 07/30/2010 9:43:58 AM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

“Why Democrats are Pushing the $165 Billion Union Pension Bailout”

Because they CAN

8 posted on 07/30/2010 9:56:24 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What luck for rulers that men do not think." Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


We need to have a tax revolt.......quit paying taxes

9 posted on 07/30/2010 10:02:58 AM PDT by Bullfrogg (American by birth, Irish by heritage, and hellraiser by choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldendays
There needs to be a prize awarded for the best named Dim bill. EVERY single one of them does the exact opposite of what its name claims to accomplish.
10 posted on 07/30/2010 10:21:02 AM PDT by JPG (Journolist diva, Sarah Spitz? No, she swallowed the whole Mongrel agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
"Next stop is our 401’s and retirement accounts to finance union bailouts."

Exactly. They will raid your 401k and give you an IOU, maybe give you a few coins in your old age, for the good of society ya know.

It is long past time we fought back to regain our heritage in this country.

11 posted on 07/30/2010 11:09:14 AM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldendays

$165,000,000,000 would pay for the biggest Democrat GOTV operation in history.

12 posted on 07/30/2010 11:20:47 AM PDT by counterpunch (Heckuva job, Barry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldendays

Wouldn’t it make sense for the unions to come up with most outlandish pension plans, with the highest payouts possible, if they know the american taxpayers will pay the pensions. The sky is the limit for all these union thugs!

13 posted on 07/30/2010 11:44:26 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullfrogg
We need to have a tax revolt.......quit paying taxes

Nice idea, but the only folks who can quit paying taxes are those who are self-employed. Anyone who works for any type of company has no choice since they never see their tax money in the first place. It is automatically withheld by the employer. The FEDS wiped out the option of NOT paying taxes years ago for times like now.

14 posted on 07/30/2010 11:48:08 AM PDT by USMA '71 ((Re-elect no one!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
Unions should be held responsible for their actions---it's time to nail fiduciaries of union pension funds. Pension fund fiduciaries could be held liable for acccepting falsified documents and then failing to do the due diligence. Approving humongous pensions based on falsified illegal information is questionable fiduciary service, and could be prosecutable.

ANALYSIS Can union pension agencies and retirees produce documents that show how they calculated million dollar pensions? Did the union pension agents and pensioneers file all the proper IRS documents? (Stolen money is taxable.)

Oh, never mind the FBI, SEC, IRS, DOJ can find out (/snix).

Filing and accepting false documents and falsified official information for fraudulent purposes incurs felony charges for 1st-degree tampering with public records, 1st-degree offering of a false instrument for filing, 4th-degree grand larceny, and 1st-degree falsifying of official records.

POSSIBLE CHARGES: Official acts prohibited, misuse of govt funds, abuse of public office; misuse of government position; abuse of government power; conflict of interest; influence buying; conspiracy to deceive; misuse of office, collusion, conspiracy to collude; extortion; govt fraud.

Possible federal offenses could include, but are not limited to:

Title 18 U.S.C. §1341, Mail Fraud, Electronic Fraud

18 U.S.C.§1001, Presenting a False Document to an Agent of the US Government,

18 U.S.C.§1027 False statements and concealment of facts in relation to documents required by the 1974 ERISA

Possible ERISA offenses including civiland/or criminal RICO violations,

18 U.S.C. §§1961-68 (RICO Act),

18 U.S.C. §241 (Conspiracy Against Civil Rights).


(1) All of the union pension documents need to be scrutinized.

(2) Banks holding monies for the union pension fund need to be examined by outside auditors to determine if the bank was used for fraud.

(3) Politicians' FEC documents need to be exposed to determine whether union pension agents AND pensioneers exchanged campaign contributions in return for pensions benefits.

15 posted on 07/31/2010 3:44:51 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldendays

16 posted on 07/31/2010 4:21:31 PM PDT by 4Liberty ( How do you spell "moral hazard"?: $ 19, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Study: States must fill $1 trillion pension gap
HARRISBURG, Pa. - States may be forced to reduce benefits, raise taxes or slash government services to address a $1 trillion funding shortfall in public sector retirement benefits, according to a new study that warns of even more debilitating costs if immediate action isn’t taken.
Another time bomb waiting to go off.
I’ve been reading this for years.

—nowhere is it more true than CA an NY. They are the models of our pending demise. don’t expect the kleptocrats in government to take any serious action .

17 posted on 08/04/2010 11:06:26 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (drain the swamp! ( then napalm it and pave it over ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson