Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US wants India to continue dialogue with Pakistan
Business Standard ^ | 30 July, 2010 | Business Standard

Posted on 07/30/2010 12:43:07 PM PDT by James C. Bennett

Even as Pakistan's ISI stands completely exposed in the eyes of the public for its terror links, in particular those against India, the Obama Administration has argued that New Delhi should continue its dialogue process with Islamabad.

"So we are simply encouraging Pakistan and India to pursue a dialogue that we think is fundamentally in the interest of both countries," State Department spokesman P J Crowley told reporters at his daily news conference.

"We encourage dialogue between India and Pakistan because it's in the interest of both the countries and in the interest of the US that these countries that have gone to war multiple times in the past 60 years need to build their own relationship, need to find ways beyond military conflict to remove tensions in the relationship, gain a greater understanding that can be of substantial benefit to both the people of India and the people of Pakistan," Crowley explained.

"As the (US) President said, we think that while there might be granularity in some of the material that's released, and again we emphasize that we think this release has done damage to our national security, there's no startling revelations in these documents," he said.

"Pakistan's relationship with elements that morphed into the Taliban go back to the Soviet occupation were very well known. They're known to the United States, they're known to India, and they're known to Afghanistan," Crowley said.

Crowley said the US itself is taking steps to bridge its trust deficit with Pakistan.

"We have demonstrated over the past couple of years our commitment to civilian government in Pakistan. And we understand that going back several years, the commitment to civilian government in Pakistan by the US has been uneven," he said.

"So this is part and parcel of improving the relationship with Pakistan. We are committed to civilian government in Pakistan. Our investments in Pakistan are geared towards helping that government build its capacity and deliver effective services to its people," he said.

The US is committed to helping Pakistan improve its economy, including the economy in the tribal areas, and the frontier areas where the US is concerned about the presence of extremist elements and safe havens that affect the security of Pakistan and the security of the United States.

"So, ultimately, we're trying to both improve relations with Pakistan and US, but we're trying to help Pakistan improve relations between its own population and its own government," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: islam; muslim; obama; pakistan

1 posted on 07/30/2010 12:43:08 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
Some gibbering idiot goofball state department rube wants India to continue what, precisely?

Yes, and people in hell want ice water.
2 posted on 07/30/2010 12:49:13 PM PDT by casuist (Audi alteram partem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
Yeah! And the Jews must negotiate the terms of their own demise with the Palestinians.
3 posted on 07/30/2010 12:49:37 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: casuist
Yeah, they could have two old men yelling at each other over the border, flipping each other off and insulting each others family. That will keep the WH happy. lol
4 posted on 07/30/2010 12:53:48 PM PDT by Dem Guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

“Obama Administration has argued that New Delhi should continue its dialogue process with Islamabad. “

Why doesn’t this muslim pos poser just shout from a mountaintop “Sharia” for all and to all a goodnight? His koolaid drinking peeps will surely approve.


5 posted on 07/30/2010 12:56:32 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

I seem to remember a country that had gotten all riled up and said “with us or against us” to state sponsors of terrorist groups that attack that country and its military.

I think it was a made for TV movie or something.

Seriously though we know the ISI had been in bed with their creation (The Taliban) the entire time. 9/10, 9/11, 9/12 no change except how much money we threw at them (which always goes up). It is a weird situation when we have troops in the field dying that we are funding the puppet masters of the men killing them.


6 posted on 07/30/2010 3:22:48 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded ("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson