Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disgust At 'Lego' Terrorist Toys
Sky News ^ | 4 December 2008 | Unknown

Posted on 07/30/2010 8:26:48 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine

A range of Lego-style fighting figurines - including an Islamic terrorist militant - has sparked outrage among Muslims.

The toy mini-figures, made by American Will Chapman, includes a masked terrorist bandit with an assault rifle, grenade launcher and belt of explosives.

Shocked by the playthings, British Muslim organisation the Ramadhan Foundation has branded the figurines "absolutely disgusting".

Chief executive Mohammed Shafiq said the figures were "glorifying terrorism".

He said: "I don't think there's any difference between someone that shouts hatred through a megaphone and someone that creates a doll that glorifies terrorists.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.sky.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: lego; militant; muslim; terrorist
This looks like an old story but it funny nonetheless.
1 posted on 07/30/2010 8:26:52 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

I want some, actually. Think of the possibilities for abuse.


2 posted on 07/30/2010 8:28:30 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“Shocked by the playthings, British Muslim organisation the Ramadhan Foundation has branded the figurines “absolutely disgusting”.

####

So why don’t YOU do something about the terrorists who are supposedly “defaming” your religion before the eyes of the world.


3 posted on 07/30/2010 8:28:38 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Who has the picture of SVEST Barbie?


4 posted on 07/30/2010 8:29:16 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (The buck, it seems, never gets to Obama; a surprise considering how many they print)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

When the lying mooselimb scum denounce Paestinian cartoon shows which glorify suicide bombing murder of Israelis, and mooselimbs stop teaching their children how to murder kittens and puppies as examples of what to do with Jews, THEN the liars may gain some credibility. Scum, pure scum.


5 posted on 07/30/2010 8:29:25 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dem voters, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Know the face of the enemy. LOL.

6 posted on 07/30/2010 8:31:32 PM PDT by gitmo ( The democRats drew first blood. It's our turn now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
I found it amusing that the webcomic Irregular Webcomic portrays Hitler as a brain in a jar thanks to Nazi science because you can't get a Hitler lego.
7 posted on 07/30/2010 8:33:06 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (There is neither honesty, manhood nor good fellowship in thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“I don’t think there’s any difference between someone that shouts hatred through a megaphone and someone that creates a doll that glorifies terrorists.”

So he’s saying the toy creator is the same as an Imam?


8 posted on 07/30/2010 8:36:06 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 ("Fanaticism is described as redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim."-G. Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“Shocked by the playthings, British Muslim organisation the Ramadhan Foundation has branded the figurines “absolutely disgusting”.

So work hard to eliminate that stereotype from your ranks.


9 posted on 07/30/2010 8:41:02 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Tolerating Islamist intolerance

 by KPS Gill


A great deal has been written on the 'cartoon controversy', but it is far from enough. The current storm of orchestrated violence and intimidatory protests across the world is symbolic of a deep and sustained intolerance among Muslims, and of rising levels of tolerance of Muslim intolerance, that jointly undermine the possibility of freedom in large parts of the world.

Crucially, it is precisely this tolerance of intolerance that has allowed vocal and violent radicalised Islamist minorities to silence Muslim majorities and to transform the global image of Islam into the grotesque parody of the faith that the Danish cartoons sought - perhaps indelicately - to reflect.

Offensive though these cartoons may have been - and they were not offensive to at least some Muslims, who saw in them, not an insult to the Prophet or the faith, but rather a critique of the unrelenting violence that has become the defining character of much of the Muslim world - the criminal incitement and calls to 'butcher/kill/behead those who insult Islam' have only reinforced the images the cartoons reflected, "allowing mass hysteria to define Islam's message".

What dishonours Islam more? A few irreverent cartoons? Or the acts of remorseless murder, of relentless violence against people of other faiths, of the intimidation and abuse of all other faiths and communities, which the Islamists - including states adhering to the Islamist ideology, such as Pakistan - routinely engage in? Why, then, does the Muslim world not rise up in rage against these fanatics and political opportunists who are bringing disgrace and disrepute to their faith? Why are the voices of criticism against extremist Islam and Islamist terrorism so muted?

Indeed, why is it that all occasional and invariably qualified criticism of these terrorists is accompanied by vague justifications of the need to 'understand root causes' and the 'hurt' caused to the 'Muslim psyche'? Is the 'Muslim psyche' uniquely susceptible to injury?

Venomous characterisations of Hindus, Jews, Christians and, generally, all kafirs, are the stock-in-trade of the discourse in some Muslim countries, often communicated through official media, such as national television channels. The ideologies of hatred against other faiths are systematically propagated in so many Muslim states - we in India are familiar with the Pakistani case, where school curricula routinely demonise non-Muslims.

And do the words or pictures or caricatures by non-Muslims do more injury to the 'Islamic world' than the hideous acts of terrorism that Islamists have been inflicting on non-Muslims - and, indeed, on so many Muslims - all over the world? Worse, after so many Muslim-majority states have simply wiped out their own minorities, or are, even today, in the process of doing so, these very states go shrieking around about 'hurting the sentiments of minorities' when something is said against Muslims or Islam.

Indeed, 'Islamic' states oppress even their own sectarian minorities - be they non-Wahabbi Sunnis in some cases, or Shia, Ismaili, Ahmadiya, or Sufi, in others - not only through systematic denial of elementary religious rights to these sects, but, as in the case of Pakistan, through state sponsored terrorist movements against such minorities - recall that the Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan was set up by General Zia-ul-Haq to target Shias in the wake of the Iranian revolution, and continued to enjoy the support of the state under successor regimes, till it got mixed up with the Al Qaeda and anti-US terrorism, and lost its status as a sarkari (state supported) jihadi organisation.

Many 'Islamic' countries have institutionalised this intolerance, outlawing the public practice of any other Faith, and made the possession of any religious icon, other than Muslim, a punishable offence. Non-Muslim minorities live in abject terror of blasphemy laws in Pakistan, as in many other Muslim countries.

The truth is, the state lies behind much of the Islamist extremism and frenzy that we are witnessing today. To return to the case of the Danish cartoons, there was no 'spontaneous outburst' of popular sentiment; it was only after the Organisation of Islamic Countries decided to whip up emotions around the issue, and states like Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Saudi Arabia began to incite the rabble through official statements and actions, or statements by religious leaders tied to the regimes there, disseminated through official media, that the violent street protests commenced.

In Pakistan, the protests and the violence have principally been led by the Jamaat-ud-Dawa - the reincarnation of the purportedly 'banned' Lashkar-e-Toiba - which has flourished under state patronage, and that was cast by the Musharraf administration into a 'leadership' role recently in the relief operations after the earthquake that devastated parts of Pakistan occupied Kashmir.

But the 'cartoon crisis' is not unique. Even while this controversy was raging across the world, Shia minorities were being attacked by Sunni terrorists in Pakistan; in the Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir, a case was registered against the local chapter of the Bible Society of India for the 'grievous crime' of distributing "gas cylinders, three water bottles, audio cassettes and a copy of the New Testament in Urdu" to earthquake victims in a village in Uri.

In Ladakh, riots were engineered between Muslims and Buddhists because some torn pages of the Quran were recovered, leading to allegations of sacrilege. In the Aligarh Muslim University, a young girl was being threatened with collective rape for daring to protest against a diktat against wearing jeans and a T-shirt. These are only a few current and proximate examples of a remorseless oppression over the decades.

Such thuggeries are, of course, not unique to Islam. There are extremist groups drawing dubious 'inspiration' from other faiths who ape such conduct as well, and Valentines Day this year - as in the past few years - attracted the ire and violence of Hindu extremist hooligans. But these remain - fortunately - aberrations in the larger context of conduct among adherents of other faiths. They have increasingly become the dominant form of public articulation in the Muslim community.

There is an American Indian saying: 'it takes an entire village to raise a single child'. Similarly, it takes a very large community, often entire nations, to raise a single suicide bomber. For far too long, extremist Muslim discourse has been tolerated - to the point of incitement to murder - in the belief that acts of terrorism are distinct from such ideologies of hatred. But it is the wide acceptance within large sections of Muslim communities in many countries of these ideologies of hatred that produce the environment within which groups can mobilise, recruit motivate, train and deploy terrorists and suicide bombers.

Muslim liberals have long advocated 'understanding and tolerance' when dealing with Muslim sensibilities, but have seldom been known to aggressively argue for greater 'understanding and tolerance' for other faiths in 'Islamic' countries, where the record of intolerance towards and oppression of religious minorities is utterly revolting. There is a great 'Muslim exceptionalism' at work here.

The 'Muslim world' demands an absolute freedom without limits, but confers no freedom whatsoever, either on other faiths, or on dissent within its own faith. The 'tolerance' advocated by certain passages in the Quran is only something to parade at inter-faith conferences, and constitutes no part of the practice of most Muslim majority states - no doubt with occasional exceptions.

The demand, today, to impose a selective censorship in Europe on speech that is insulting to Muslims - when similar speech against other faiths enjoys full freedom - is an effort by Muslim minorities to impose, through mass violence and intimidation, their belief systems within the larger systems they have come to inhabit.

Europe would be, not only foolish, but suicidal, if it succumbs to this terrorism and coercion to invent new curbs on the media and on the freedom of speech. The democratic world must remain committed to its enlightenment values and ideals, and to the rough-and-tumble of free discourse in the 'marketplace of ideas'. All communal thuggeries, whatever faith they may claim to 'represent', must be brought to an end, and every available means must be bent to this purpose.

Personally, I think, the more fun we make of our own religions, the better it will be for the whole world, and, indeed, for our respective Faiths. I am immensely proud of being a Sikh, and am confident that no jokes or cartoons can ever undermine the eternal verities of my religion.

 http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/kpsgill/governance/06_Feb18Pio.htm

(Published in The Pioneer Newpaper, India - February 18, 2006)

 

Kanwar Pal Singh Gill

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanwar_Pal_Singh_Gill

Kanwar Pal Gill, was born in Ludhiana, Punjab, India. He began his career as a police officer in the north-eastern state of Assam, quickly earning a reputation as a tough officer. He became a household name across the country as Punjab police chief in the early 1990s, when he was credited with crushing a separatist revolt in the Sikh-majority state.

Widely given credit for addressing the terrorism in Punjab, Mr Gill was dubbed “Super Cop” after his successes there. He publishes the Faultlines journal and runs the Institute for Conflict Management, as well as advising governments and institutions on security related issues. He was asked by the government of Sri Lanka last year for similar advice. Mr Gill has also written a book, “The Knights of Falsehood”, which explores the abuse of religious institutions by the politics of freedom struggle in Punjab.

He got involved in sports administration after retirement and is currently the IHF ( Indian Hockey Federation) president.

He has also been appointed as a consultant by the Chattisgarh government to help tackle the Naxalite movement in the state.

Quotes

“Democracy and liberalism are not a sufficient defence and this is a fact that the ideologues of ‘freedom’ need, equally, to comprehend. There is a fatal flaw in the liberal mind. Having established, in structure and form [though seldom in substance], a system of governance that corresponds to its conception of democracy, it feels that nothing more needs to be done. The ‘Truths’ of the liberal ideology are, as the American Declaration on the Rights of Man expresses it, ‘Self Evident’. They require no proof, no reiteration, and no defence - certainly no defence by force of arms. Once democracy [or even the ritual of quinquinneal elections] is established, according to liberal mythology, the mystical ‘invisible hand’ keeps everything in place; the ‘superior wisdom of the masses’ ensures order and justice...”. This is just so much rubbish. As we should know after living with falsehoods for fifty years now. Truth does not triumph; unless it has champions to propound it, unless it has armies to defend it.”

From his book, ‘Punjab: The Knights of Falsehood’

Criticism

For some critics his success is a part of the story started by predecessor Julio Francis Ribeiro who started the “Bullet for Bullet” campaign of hitting back at militants and the strong hand in dealing with militancy adopted by Chief Minister Beant Singh.
 

10 posted on 07/30/2010 8:44:45 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
We need a Lego Mohamed.
11 posted on 07/30/2010 8:53:13 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Hahahahaaaaa I want some!


12 posted on 07/30/2010 8:55:37 PM PDT by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
We need a Lego Mohamed.


13 posted on 07/30/2010 8:56:52 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Funny.


14 posted on 07/30/2010 9:01:04 PM PDT by americanophile (November can't come fast enough....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

His beard should be Henna red.


15 posted on 07/30/2010 9:03:44 PM PDT by MadJack ("Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet." (Afghan proverb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
That is hilarious!
Are you ready for a “fatwa” against you now?
16 posted on 07/30/2010 9:05:37 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I didn’t make it (someone else did, during the “Cartoon Crisis”).


17 posted on 07/30/2010 9:09:53 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
"outrage among Muslims"

Question -- where is the outrage over:

Beheadings in the name of Allah?

Executing raped women because they shouldn't have been out unescorted anyway?

Murder of infidels where ever they find them?

Honor killing of daughters who date men the father doesn't like?

Death to cartoonists!


18 posted on 07/30/2010 9:21:03 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

lol


19 posted on 07/30/2010 9:24:37 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Here are a pile of heads from victims of Continuous Islamic Outrage.

20 posted on 07/30/2010 9:31:26 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Gun control was originally to protect Klansmen from their victims. The basic reason hasn't changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
...This is just so much rubbish. As we should know after living with falsehoods for fifty years now. Truth does not triumph; unless it has champions to propound it, unless it has armies to defend it.”

In other words, freedom ain't free. Good article. Truth backed by experience.

21 posted on 07/30/2010 9:34:02 PM PDT by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
Shocked by the playthings, British Muslim organisation the Ramadhan Foundation has branded the figurines "absolutely disgusting".

The real thing is even more disgusting, you dopes.

22 posted on 07/30/2010 9:36:53 PM PDT by pray4liberty (dare I say it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

23 posted on 07/30/2010 9:39:54 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Think of all of the funny animated movies about Islam you could make with these Legos that would rile the Muzzies to no end!


24 posted on 07/30/2010 10:16:10 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I’d like to see a Lego version of the Infidel Cookies video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f7_O9x65E0


25 posted on 07/30/2010 10:17:06 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Hey, if the burqa fits, wear it.


26 posted on 07/30/2010 10:17:17 PM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

The Islamic Fundamentalists are more angry at every little thing than some liberals!


27 posted on 07/31/2010 2:36:32 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson