Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

Nothing specifically says that the arms must be allowed to be anything other than single shot muzzleloaders, or that they must not be required to have a nine foot barrel extension permanently welded on. Still comfortable with the line of reasoning?


20 posted on 07/30/2010 9:57:21 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Trod Upon

Nothing specifically says it cannot be a B-61 nuke. Still comfortable with that line of reasoning?

A serial number does not impact the gun’s ability to function. I can protect myself as well with a gun that has a serial number as one without. All the guns I carried in the military had serial numbers.


21 posted on 07/30/2010 10:07:43 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Trod Upon

Lets say that your guns are stolen, and then recovered with the serial numbers removed. In this case, there is no doubt that they are yours, because they all have custom made stocks by you, you have pictures, and the thieves were caught with only these guns, and video was taken at your residence of the thieves removing them.

Is it right that these guns are now illegal, and cannot be given back to their rightful owner?


42 posted on 07/31/2010 3:48:09 AM PDT by xmission (www.iwilldefendtheconstitution.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson