Skip to comments.
Five Ways to Talk to the Left about Same-Sex Marriage (and to the Right, esp. Rush Limbaugh)
InsideCatholic ^
| July 29, 2010
| Eric Pavlat
Posted on 07/31/2010 8:07:55 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 last
To: Antoninus
Who said anything about it being the moral equivalent? I said in my post that even gays don’t believe civil unions to be equal to marriage. That’s why, even though they have civil unions in Oregon, they are still trying to have same sex marriage recognized.
61
posted on
08/02/2010 12:05:58 AM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
(Remember November...I can see it from my house!)
To: dixiechick2000
Who said anything about it being the moral equivalent?
I would ask you to tell me how civil unions are functionally different than marriages, but it would be a complete waste of time.
There is absolutely nothing conservative about legitimizing same-sex relationships. Zero. Zip. Nada.
62
posted on
08/02/2010 10:40:31 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
To: Antoninus
Okie dokie!
BTW...I never said that I agreed with either of those issues. What concerned me was you being so judgemental. “Judge not, lest ye be judged.”
Have a great night!
63
posted on
08/03/2010 12:02:48 AM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
(Remember November...I can see it from my house!)
To: dixiechick2000
BTW...I never said that I agreed with either of those issues. What concerned me was you being so judgemental. “Judge not, lest ye be judged.”
I am content that the Lord be my judge.
As for this issue, I fear less being judged by other men as too "judgmental" than judged by God as remaining silent when wickedness is called good.
64
posted on
08/03/2010 8:14:42 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
To: Southack
Then polygamy is permitted. Government can and does have a role to play in marriage, which is why it requires one man and one woman. Arguing that government has no role, effectively destroys the entire concept of civil marriage.
65
posted on
08/05/2010 4:41:57 PM PDT
by
BenKenobi
(We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -Silent Cal)
To: BenKenobi
Government is barred from institutionalizing religion by the 1st amendment, and marriage is entirely religious.
66
posted on
08/05/2010 6:56:05 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
Marriage between one man and one woman does not institutionalise one church over another. There’s no 1st amendment violation. Marriage between one man and one woman is a part of the common law and always has been.
67
posted on
08/05/2010 9:05:29 PM PDT
by
BenKenobi
(We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -Silent Cal)
To: BenKenobi
Government is forbidden from performing religious ceremonies like baptisms. Like baptisms, marriages are religious, too.
That government interferes in such religious ceremonies is besides the point...they aren’t supposed to.
68
posted on
08/05/2010 9:11:45 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson