Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military Homosexual Scandal Tied to WikiLeaks Treason
Gulag Bound ^ | August 1, 2010 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 08/01/2010 12:40:40 PM PDT by unspun

In the scandal involving the theft and release of classified military information that could cost the lives of U.S. military personnel, the British Telegraph newspaper is reporting that the American soldier at the center of the scandal was “openly homosexual” and apparently held a grudge against the U.S. because of the military’s anti-gay policy.

In another bizarre twist, reliable reports suggest that Private First Class Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army Intelligence analyst accused of leaking the classified information to the WikiLeaks.org website, was not only a homosexual but was considering a sex change. Manning was arrested at the end of May and is being detained by U.S. authorities.

The Telegraph features photographs of Manning, who could face more than 50 years in prison for treasonous conduct, holding up a sign with rainbow colors demanding “equality on the battlefield” and participating in a gay pride parade.

It is apparent that Manning, based on published reports, was a public homosexual activist for at least over a year. During this time he apparently came up with the idea of downloading and releasing the classified information to WikiLeaks as a way to get back at the United States military over its policy regarding homosexuality.

Telegraph writers Heidi Blake, John Bingham and Gordon Rayner write that Manning had “appeared to sink into depression after a relationship break-up” and became increasingly bitter with his treatment by the Army.

It may be the case that Manning was anxious about the failure of Congress to pass the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” anti-gay military policy.

President Obama had promised during the 2008 campaign to repeal the policy and in office has championed the “rights” of homosexual and “transgendered” people to high-level federal positions.

The riveting Telegraph account of Manning’s growing rage and anger raises serious questions of how the soldier was able to flaunt his homosexuality despite the fact that the Pentagon still officially has a policy in place of excluding open homosexuals from military service.

In a clear indication that the law was being ignored by the Obama Administration, the evidence demonstrates that Manning was continuing to serve after openly flaunting his homosexuality, including on Facebook.

Who in the Obama Administration—and the Department of Defense—was aware of his conduct and looked the other way? Was Manning given a pass because his “lifestyle” was considered to be in favor and acceptable under the Obama Administration?

Now, because of the obvious mishandling of this homosexual ticking time bomb, it appears that the United States, its soldiers, and relations with countries in the region will pay the price. Lives—and a war on terrorism in Afghanistan—could be lost.

The revelations of Manning’s openly pro-homosexual conduct suggest that a more liberal Department of Defense policy, in deference to the wishes of the Commander-in-Chief, had already been in effect and has now backfired in a big way. The result could be not only the loss of the lives of U.S. soldiers, as a result of the enemy understanding U.S. intelligence sources and methods, but damaged relations with Afghanistan and Pakistan and a possible U.S. military defeat in the region as a whole.

The obvious intention is to inflict a humiliating defeat on the U.S. military in Afghanistan, forcing a withdrawal of U.S. forces before the country is stabilized and free of terrorist activity.

The result could be the major reemergence of Al Qaeda and its Taliban backers in a position to strike the United States in a 9/11-type terror attack.

It will be interesting to see how the pro-homosexual U.S. media deal with the shocking revelations about Manning—and whether they investigate whether he was part of a secret homosexual network in the military that is currently working with WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, once part of a group called the “International Subversives.” Assange, a native of Australia with an anti-American and anti-military bent, has a criminal record for illegal computer hacking.

Assange released the documents in coordination with their publication and analysis by the British Guardian, the German Der Spiegel, and The New York Times.

Although in the military service, Manning had his own anti-military bent, based on his opposition to the defense policy of keeping open and active homosexuals out, and advertised his homosexuality on his Facebook page.

Gawker.com reports that “A screen capture of Manning’s Facebook profile shows the pages he liked were almost exclusively LGBT-related, including LGBT America, Gay Marriage, Equality Maryland, Dan Savage, Human Rights Campaign, etc.”

LGBT refers to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered.

The Facebook image also shows that he enjoyed the MSNBC program hosted by Rachel Maddow, the lesbian activist, and that he listed Media Matters and the National Center for Transgender Equality as being among his “likes and interests.” Media Matters is run by gay activist David Brock.

Manning’s favorite personalities included Barack and Michelle Obama and Barney Frank, the openly gay member of Congress from Massachusetts. He even listed Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who supports Obama’s repeal of the homosexual exclusion policy, as being among his favorite personalities.

Gawker cites evidence that Manning contacted well-known trans videoblogger ZJ via AOL Instant Messenger as far back as February 21, 2009, and said that he enjoyed the videos on the site. “He just said he enjoyed my videos,” ZJ said. “He told me that me and him were on the same page.”

ZJ is “Zinnia Jones” and the site is linked to a Facebook entry for “Queer and Queer-Supportive Atheists,” described as “A group for atheists and agnostics who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, intersex, or otherwise queer, as well as straight allies. We support LGBT rights and oppose the influence of religion in the government and the law.”

The dramatic revelations about Manning’s circle of friends and associates suggest that, rather than repeal the homosexual exclusion policy, as Obama is demanding, the prohibition on homosexuals should have been more strictly enforced and that it should be strengthened today. What’s more, it is clear that Manning should have been expelled from the Armed Forces long before he allegedly did his damage to U.S. national security.

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Navy Admiral Mike Mullen, has said that “Releasing classified documents could put in jeopardy American lives,” but has supported repeal of the prohibition on open homosexuals serving in the military. Such a change would bring more people with sexual identity problems like Bradley Manning into the Armed Forces.

The repeal, however, has not passed both Houses of Congress and remains a contentious issue on Capitol Hill.

This is important because the Manning scandal provides ammunition to those who want to maintain the exclusion of homosexuals from the military. It proves in dramatic terms that homosexuals with gender identity disorders are potentially unstable and that their strange sexual preferences can subvert the military mission and cost lives.

However, a libertarian writer named Justin Raimondo on the website of antiwar.com is calling Manning an “American patriot” and “true soldier” for releasing thousands of classified documents. Raimondo, who is himself gay, suggests that supporters of Manning go to a “Help Bradley Manning” site.

But the revelations about Manning keep coming.

Another British publication, the Daily Mail, reports that a friend said Manning, who was born in the United States but raised in Britain, had been gay since the age of 13. The friend wondered why the U.S. Army “didn’t ask more questions when they recruited him.”

Is this more evidence that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” has been ignored and not enforced?

While the WikiLeaks scandal is the subject of numerous and continuing press reports, the Telegraph account of his “openly homosexual” conduct is the first to provide absolute proof that he was a gay activist who wanted to strike back against the U.S. military.

However, several weeks ago, on July 6, the Associated Press ran a story that hinted at the controversy. It reported that Manning’s Facebook page had included numerous gay references and quoted a friend of Manning as saying that in recent months he “seemed to have grown more aware of social issues, including the gay-rights movement.” Manning reportedly described himself as “nonreligious” and had custom-made military dog tags reading “humanist.”

Before this, on June 8, Shane Harris of the Washingtonian had quoted a friend as saying that Manning was going to be discharged from the Army because of “an adjustment disorder.” The publication said that questions were raised by some observers “about whether Manning could have been dismissed under the military’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy, which forbids homosexuals from serving openly.”

This adds to the evidence that Manning’s actions were motivated by hatred of the U.S. military over its anti-gay policy.

Adding further intrigue, the website known as “Boing Boing” suggests that Manning was a transsexual undergoing a transition from male to female and notes that his friend, Adrian Lamo, was an active member of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender community. It cites evidence that Lamo had been appointed as a member of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Questioning Youth Task Force in San Francisco.

Commenting on transcripts of chats between Manning and Lamo, the website known as “QueerTV” said that Manning “might be one of us” and that the conversations “reveal the soldier might identify as transgender.”

Manning’s affinity on his Facebook page for “Repeal the Ban” is also significant. It is a project of a group called Servicemembers United, which describes itself as “the nation’s largest organization of gay and lesbian troops and veterans, their allies and supporters.” The group receives financial support from the Open Society Institute of billionaire George Soros.

As the military and the FBI attempt to get to the bottom of what Manning allegedly did and for what reason, the need for an investigation of homosexual misconduct in the Armed Forces—before any change in policy is adopted by Congress—has been presented in dramatic fashion.


Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of Accuracy in Media, and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org. ?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: aim; august; bho44; bhodod; bhohomosexualagenda; bradleymanning; cliffkincaid; dadt; fdrq; homosexualagenda; julianassange; manning; osi; sexuality; soros; treason; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-128 next last

1 posted on 08/01/2010 12:40:47 PM PDT by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: unspun

Why am I not surprised?


2 posted on 08/01/2010 12:42:05 PM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Can I join you on the not surprised team?


3 posted on 08/01/2010 12:45:54 PM PDT by edcoil (There has got to be a better way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unspun

It figures.

More proof that gays in the military are trouble.


4 posted on 08/01/2010 12:48:35 PM PDT by Palladin (Obama on The View: "When those folks came over on 9-11". Folks??? WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
FYI


5 posted on 08/01/2010 12:53:05 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
During this time he apparently came up with the idea of downloading and releasing the classified information to WikiLeaks as a way to get back at the United States military over its policy regarding homosexuality.

And so what if some soldiers or the Afghan informers he released information on get killed. Maybe don't ask don't tell was too accepting. If he wasn't in the military less people would be in danger of getting killed.

6 posted on 08/01/2010 12:53:58 PM PDT by highlander_UW (Education is too important to abdicate control of it to the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Let me at him. I’ll give him a sex change operation!


7 posted on 08/01/2010 12:54:08 PM PDT by donhunt (Where does this totalitarian ashwipe get off telling me I can't chose for myself?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edcoil; b4its2late

The nasty dude who runs wikileaks looks gay too. In fact, he looks emaciated and gay. Hell hath NO fury like an ultra feminine homosexual male. That is a fact. I have never seen such vindictiveness as I have seen from those guys when they feel crossed.
They put women scorned to shame.


8 posted on 08/01/2010 12:57:13 PM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unspun
If he hated it so much, why did he join...he knew the policy before he took the oath.

Oh, that's right, the oath didn't mean anything to him, only the chance to further his own goals.

9 posted on 08/01/2010 12:58:57 PM PDT by and so? (If it angers you, a sarcasm or irony tag after everything I post should be assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Don’t hold your breath until THIS is featured on CNN!!


10 posted on 08/01/2010 12:59:11 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

He is just trying to become more like his Prez...Obambi


11 posted on 08/01/2010 12:59:54 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donhunt
Totally and absolutely absorbed little puke. To hell with the others and my fellow soldiers . His gayness takes priority over others lives.
12 posted on 08/01/2010 12:59:53 PM PDT by fantom (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Homosexuals being security risks was one of the key arguments against the don’t ask don’t tell policy. More chickens coming home to roost


13 posted on 08/01/2010 1:00:07 PM PDT by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
It's amazing how many transgenders have served in the military. Usually 50% or more in any random trans support group.

Of those, usually half loved the military and continue to respect it. The other half are almost always angry and disdainful about the military.

This happens a lot because many transgenders, being young and confused about their feelings, join the military to immerse themselves in a hyper-masculine environment - thinking that will purge their desires. Once in the military for a few years they start to mature, then develop resentment over their being trapped in their decision.

This is a perfect example of why these people should be removed from military service as soon as they're discovered.

14 posted on 08/01/2010 1:02:31 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donhunt

Just turn him loose on any US military installation.

He’d deserver exactly what he’d get.


15 posted on 08/01/2010 1:03:41 PM PDT by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

SHOOT HIM DEAD
TREASON IN A TIME OF WAR
BAAAAMMMMMM.


16 posted on 08/01/2010 1:03:53 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Who is going to start the internal investigation into this and Hassan and all of the other “plants” that keep plaguing the military and intelligence? Is it not clear yet that they did not get ignored, or promoted or PLACED into situations where their twisted ideology could do the most damage? These are not crimes of opportunity...they are “man created disasters”


17 posted on 08/01/2010 1:04:38 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

UK Telegraph is the best newspaper in the world followed by it’s sister paper the Daily Mail. Owned by the Barclay brothers who are reclusive English Scottish Catholics. The next paper is Investors Business Daily woned by Wm O’Neil in LA.

Sadly the U.S. media is controlled by the elites especially TV. I thought this creepy kid was gay.


18 posted on 08/01/2010 1:04:59 PM PDT by Frantzie (Television controls the American people/sheep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

If guilty, he should be executed.

Then, proclaim “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” extension for 20 years to teach this group a lesson.

Lastly, strengthen the policy and boot every open homosexual out of the military.


19 posted on 08/01/2010 1:08:32 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Maybe he thinks gays would be better off under Sharia Law..


20 posted on 08/01/2010 1:10:48 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Keep your socialized health care off my body !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

He won’t need a sex change, or any gender at all, being in ADX Florence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adx_florence


21 posted on 08/01/2010 1:11:45 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

For sure


22 posted on 08/01/2010 1:12:57 PM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unspun

bump


23 posted on 08/01/2010 1:15:24 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Obama’s fault!


24 posted on 08/01/2010 1:19:37 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kathy in Alaska; LUV W; SandRat; tomkow6; All

You want see this guy Facebook page


25 posted on 08/01/2010 1:21:05 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us ,resistance is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

“Maybe don’t ask don’t tell was too accepting. “

Somehow I think a case for the opposite will be made from this. Coincidence? I think not. They’ve vowed not to let a crisis, manufactured or not, go to waste. A ‘crisis’ has preceded every one of Obama’s “fundamental transformations”.


26 posted on 08/01/2010 1:22:03 PM PDT by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Is this the guy who said he was singing along to Lady GaGa, while copying the disk? Maybe the US Army should change its “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy to “Don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t make it bleedin’ obvious”.


27 posted on 08/01/2010 1:24:05 PM PDT by WilliamTells
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

A faggot, hoping to become a girl? Gee whiz, whoda thunk it?


28 posted on 08/01/2010 1:26:17 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
I have never seen such vindictiveness as I have seen from those guys when they feel crossed. They put women scorned to shame.

You're right of course as I have observed this at work. Scorned phags are worse than scorned women.

29 posted on 08/01/2010 1:28:11 PM PDT by 03A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

If they can be gay and proud, I can be a heterosexual and proud of that!


30 posted on 08/01/2010 1:28:19 PM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: and so?

He was dumb enough to join the US military even though he has British and American citizenship he should of joined the British one instead and he could of been out and proud as he wanted.

If people died due to his leaks, he should be hanged.


31 posted on 08/01/2010 1:29:25 PM PDT by Munson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: unspun

I cannot think of a single American institution that the Left has not corrupted and soiled.


32 posted on 08/01/2010 1:34:56 PM PDT by Jacquerie (It is happening here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Git a rope and hang the traitor.
He deserves nothing less.


33 posted on 08/01/2010 1:36:45 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Obama, the Criminal, is BAD for AMERICA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

new it new it new it. protecting obama. thats all. obama


34 posted on 08/01/2010 1:38:19 PM PDT by truthbetold11 (truthbetold11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Shades of Clayton Hartwig
35 posted on 08/01/2010 1:38:19 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

I don’t understand why this treason in wartime, especially when it could well directly cause the death of soldiers and allies, isn’t being tried as a capital crime.


36 posted on 08/01/2010 1:38:58 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: unspun

during the Cold War the Soviets actively and successfully recruited US homosexuals in sensitive areas of governmental and military using blackmail to turn them - well documented.


37 posted on 08/01/2010 1:39:54 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Years ago, before the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” nonsense, homosexuals were considered a security risk.

Not it appears the old soldiers were right!


38 posted on 08/01/2010 1:40:05 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( Viva los SB 1070)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Pretty surprising that he would get top secret clearance when Homosexuals have one of the highest suicide rates and risk behavior.


39 posted on 08/01/2010 1:41:17 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Bradley Manning has proven the point as to why Homosexual’s shouldn’t be in the military, or any position of responsibility as they are entirely to emotionally flighty, and therefore reliably unreliable.

Military personnel depend upon each other. If one cannot depend upon another there is no military to depend upon.


40 posted on 08/01/2010 1:41:53 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Liberalism draws criminals as excrement draws flies. Liberals are only good for bait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Exactly. His loyal to his comrades meant zilch next to his loyalty to the militant queer agenda. He had no loyalty to the military, it was merely a vehicle for gaining attention to his cause. When he didn’t get everything he considered himself “entitled” to based on his choice of sexual perversion, he was willing and ready to place good men and women in danger out of spite. As with most queers, their “rights” to their perverted sex practices trump any other consideration- loyalty to their comrades, to their oath, to their country, to the rights of parents not to have their children corrupted, etc. It’s astounding how their enslavement to a perverted sex practice trumps every other consideration in life.


41 posted on 08/01/2010 1:41:53 PM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
YUCK!!!!!

A Lavender LOON.

42 posted on 08/01/2010 1:42:55 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: unspun

What he was saying was, “YOU DIE, my brothers in combat, to some of whom I am sexually attracted, DIE, so that I can get my choppadicoffomy surgery and still stay in your foxhole! It’s America’s fault that I am screwed up!”


43 posted on 08/01/2010 1:43:51 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

I thought that also, I thought he had the somewhat insane look in his eyes that the Heaven’s Gate cult members had. I won’t be surprised to hear of him, in the future, committing some act of terrorism.


44 posted on 08/01/2010 1:44:31 PM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Manning was definately a Dem libtard that lacked “cojones”......opps, my bad, Palin suggested such about the AnnointedIdiot....the same AnnointedIdiot that has bisexual/homosexual rumors fluttering around himself...wow, irony. =.=


45 posted on 08/01/2010 1:45:14 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

a woman scorned?

how soon before MSNBC blames the army?

ALL the outlets are spinning doubletime to censor this.

Will rush cover this? Beck? hanity?


46 posted on 08/01/2010 1:45:43 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: and so?
If he hated it so much, why did he join...

Because thats where the boys are.

47 posted on 08/01/2010 1:46:48 PM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: unspun
... the scandal involving the theft and release of classified military information that could cost the lives of U.S. military personnel, the British Telegraph newspaper is reporting that the American soldier at the center of the scandal was “openly homosexual” and apparently held a grudge against the U.S. because of the military’s anti-gay policy.

This might explain in part why the MSM evening news was putting this story first - on top - then seemed to drop it. The way the MSM covered the story originally, I feared a conservative might be behind it... now... the JournoListers will lose interest... It becomes 'old news' if it makes one of their team look bad...

48 posted on 08/01/2010 1:50:10 PM PDT by GOPJ (..Liberalism is Intolerance..- - Freeper Eric in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: and so?

[If he hated it so much, why did he join...he knew the policy before he took the oath.
Oh, that’s right, the oath didn’t mean anything to him, only the chance to further his own goals.]

My sentiments verbatim!


49 posted on 08/01/2010 1:50:55 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (A "tea bagger"? Say it to my face. ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Put the little faggot on trial, convict him, hang the sonuvabitch.

Homosexuality was at one time considered a mental disorder, was a surefire way to NOT obtain a security clearance, and would get one bounced out of the military post haste.

Get the queers out of our armed forces, and do it now.


50 posted on 08/01/2010 1:52:10 PM PDT by mkjessup (0bama is a traitor. And he squats to pee too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson