Skip to comments.Lolo Soetoro U.S. Records - Allen v DHS State and Allen v USCIS - FOIA Releases Final 7-29-10
Posted on 08/03/2010 3:23:40 PM PDT by bushpilot1
Recent FOIA documents reveal Obama may be Born in Hawaii.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
The second, which is most relevant, is better.
they are doing a better job now.
That is actually done on an antique store 1960’s typewriter. They learned after Rathergate.
There's a workaround for this.
Uh ha, you bet. Sure thing. Did you know gullible was actually left out of the Webster’s Dictionary in 1994’s edition?
That make him no more Natural Born than any of the anchor babies being granted citizenship.
All we are saying♩♪♫
is give release a chance♩♪♫
They borrowed a typewriter from dan rather.
So that is what a long-form birth certificate looks like, eh?
Where there’s smoke there’s fire.
Everything but a long form birth certificate... COLB, a website that says so, now some crappo document with no evidence of a birth, only a claim...
Ok, I buy it. So now we can see the Birth Certificate? ... uh, what do you mean it’s still “sealed” ... why?
It was for just a split second, and I felt terrible afterwards, but you got me lol.
What’s up with the l’s an 1’s one the second page. It wasn’t a problem on the first page. Why isn’t “united states” capitalized with Honolulu clearly is? Capitalization errors are a classic leftist mistake.
Two different typewriters. The lower case “L” on page 2 is incomplete throughout.
Somebody ping Buckhead, we need him.
Why wasn’t United States capitalized? Is that SOP for government employees?
Agreed. Obama is not a natural born citizen.
Last time I looked, MAY doesn’t mean WAS!
Last time I looked, MAY doesn’t mean WAS!
Must be to trip up the Army Dr. who is on His way to court.
Just out of the blue, this shows up.
They lie, then deceive, call you a raciest, but never just show you the proof.
I love those “L”s and “l”s.
Where’s Howlin? and Buckhead?
I call BS.
Deliberate and misleading
The birthers have their panties in a wad over this. But, not to worry, their collective astute legal minds are already hard at work, explanations are at hand on other threads and already appearing on this one. Forgers, antique typewriters, visiting Martians all play a role and will be exposed one by one. Nothing can stop the birther inquisition.
Benny Hill read a short story from an author who had the “h” inoperative from his typewriter.
August 4, '96, the United States isn't capitalized? WTF?
How about just the phakin' BC!
Let us not forget, tomorrow is his birthday.
My leg has been pulled before, but not again.
Seems like they are trying REALLY hard to prove that Barry is legit.
My guess is that the evidence for Urkle’s citizenship is his mother’s assertion. Several of the documents linked speak of him as “...his mother’s child by a previous marriage...” which she saw and likely then modified her description of him by adding “...United State’s citizen...” to “child”.
Page number 000039 and 000047 came out good so where are the 6 pages in between? I could make this bad of a record.
M. L. Mix didn’t see fit to capitalize “United States”?
Doesn’t change that he was an Indonesian student at Occidental.
There has been a recent dumping of documents by the Obama regime.
The fact remains Obama is an illegal president based on his father being an alien.
I think he will release it with his Memoirs in 2014 He will be unemployed at the time and loves writing about himself.
Our kids birth cert. have the full year and then the typed out year.....hhhmmmm.
Interesting condensed history of this agency:
The State Department first established a Division of Cultural Relations in 1938. In 1944, it was placed under the direction of the first Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs. What is now known as the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs was formerly established on April 17th, 1960, after previously being labeled the Bureau of International Cultural Relations in 1959. The Bureau functioned as part of the State Department until 1978 when its functions were transferred to the International Communications Agency (later the US Information Agency). However, the Bureau was transferred back into the State Department when the USIA was merged into the Department of State in 1999.
When this “document” was produced, the department was called “The Bureau of International Cultural Relations”.
I think the letter is a fake......
The pages posted are located in the link provided. There are over 100 pages in the released documents regarding Mr. Soetoro’s US State Department applications for a visa.
Stanley Ann Dunham knew she was in a fix when her child was born outside the U.S. She risked having his entrance into the U.S. barred and a lifetime of complicated paperwork in order to travel in and out of the U.S. Together with her parents she conspired to feign the birth of the child on US soil so as to avoid the lengthy and complicated process of acquire citizenship for the child. The process was rather simple. They placed a couple of announcements in local papers to imply that he had been born in Hawaii. When mother and child were well enough to travel, they returned to Hawaii, acquired the certificate of live birth, and have perpetuated the myth until this day. If they lied to get a certificate of live birth in order to falsely claim citizenship, doesn’t it make sense that they would continue to lie in order to perpetuate the first lie? This document means nothing except that they were able successfully to pull off the original lie. The absence of the birth certificate continues to point to the original fraud.
I think this is important and worth noting.
If you read the entire file of documents to understand how they were going about things, one would conclude that most likely the information in this memo was obtained by calling Ann and asking her, and then looking at the INA statute and typing out the memo to file.
There is no reason to think anyone contacted the State of Hawaii vital statistics department to actually see any original documents.
And doing that would have been beyond the scope of what they were trying to figure out. They were trying to determine whether Lolo should be granted a waiver or extension of his visa. Part of that is trying to understand his family situation.
As one can see in the file, most of the relevant information they got from talking to Lolo or to Ann or communicating with the people at the center running the foreign exchange student program.
What letterhead was this written on? If it was governmental it would be identified on the masthead, and the author of the “letter” would be identified by his title or position.
This looks pretty bogus.
From the 40th document of the link dated 8/21/1967:
There is nothing in the file to document the status of the spouse’s son. Please inquire into his citizenship and residence status.....
First, because he doesn't have to. Second, it is far more useful to let his enemies (us) continue to tilt at windmills.
I would be curious to FOIA all of the documents typed up by William Mix one year prior and one year after this letter... and determine if a substantial number are missing the 1 and the l keys...
The title at the article link is as follows:
“Lolo Soetoro U.S. Records - Allen v DHS State and Allen v USCIS - FOIA Releases Final 7-29-10”
The headline on this thread is a complete fabrication, and should be changed, or the thread should be pulled.The title is grossly misleading and a complete fabrication to support disinformation about the issue.
That document doesn’t prove a friggin thing, even if it is genuine.