Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New campaign is demanding 'gay' Prop 8 judge be booted
WND ^ | August 04, 2010 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 08/05/2010 5:41:24 PM PDT by RobinMasters

An openly homosexual federal judge in California ignored a warning from the state's own Supreme Court about the coming chaos of polygamy and incest if same-sex "marriages" are established to enjoin enforcement of the state's constitutional definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman only – and now he is being targeted by an impeachment campaign.

Judge Vaughn Walker, who openly has lived a homosexual lifestyle, yesterday issued an order that the state could not enforce its own constitutional requirement that marriage is between members of the opposite sex only.

The ruling from Walker said, "race and gender restrictions shaped marriage during eras of race and gender inequality, but such restrictions were never part of the historical core of the institution of marriage. Today, gender is not relevant to the state in determining spouses' obligations to each other…

"Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage," Walker said.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bglobemanipulation; bishopromney; bostonglobe; bostonglobe4marshall; carpetbaggerromney; gaymarriage; margaretmarshall; newyorktimes; novote4you; nytimesmanipulation; romney; romneyfascism; romneymarriage; romneyvsclerks; romneyvsconstitution

1 posted on 08/05/2010 5:41:26 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Bob Ruh-Roh.


2 posted on 08/05/2010 5:42:39 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Gays value their sexual identity more than the content of their character.They may be the only group on the planet that does that.


3 posted on 08/05/2010 5:45:30 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop thinking about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Gee you would think by this reaction that the 7 million people who voted for prop 8 actually think thier opinion means something.


4 posted on 08/05/2010 5:46:58 PM PDT by heshtesh (ueer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Farmer Dean

“Gays value their sexual identity more than the content of their character. They may be the only group on the planet that does that.”

Well, the girls at the chicken ranches maybe.


6 posted on 08/05/2010 5:49:34 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

There’s a populace that is beginning to boil. I live here in deep dark liberal connecticut, and they are thoroughly PISSED OFF at the havoc wrought by those they voted for.

Yes, they wanted change, but hell no did they want the destruction owe-bama has wrought!

Look for a sea-change in November

And vote for me, i’m on the ballot for a local seat held by a commie for 30 years! :)


7 posted on 08/05/2010 5:50:37 PM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

Sodomites are a thoroughly ate up collection of people.


8 posted on 08/05/2010 5:53:50 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I have been keeping notes on some of these guys.

Vaughn Walker
August 4, 2010
In a ruling expected to serve as the first draft in a drawn out legal battle, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker concluded that voter-approved Proposition 8 tramples on the rights of gay and lesbian couples, has no social justification and is unconstitutional
http://www.dailynews.com/breakingnews/ci_15677141

100728 Susan Bolton Stops Az SB 1070
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/07/28/128828182/in-az-ruling-judge-cites-burden-on-legal-immigrants-u-s

100722 A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit filed by a former Ohio State University librarian who said he was forced out of his job because of his conservative Christian beliefs.
U.S. District Court Judge William Bertelsman ruled that the university’s Mansfield campus did not violate Scott Savage’s civil rights by being hostile to his beliefs.
In 2006, Savage was asked to serve on a committee to develop a required reading list for incoming freshmen. He noticed that every book was either liberal or promoted what he called a gay agenda.
So Savage recommended four conservative books – and that’s where his troubles began.

100719 Oklahoma County judge blocks enforcement of ultrasound abortion law
District judge Noma Gurich extended a temporary ban on enforcing the state law. District Judge Noma Gurich set the next hearing for Jan. 21.
The 2010 law requires a doctor or technician to perform an ultrasound at least an hour before a scheduled abortion so the pregnant woman can see the images of the fetus. The doctor or technician must describe the ultrasound images to the woman, even if she objects. A patient can avert her eyes.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2555500/posts

100716 Mass marriage problems
http://townhall.com/columnists/HarryRJacksonJr/2010/07/16/mass_marriage_problems
Joseph Tauro ruled Defense of Marriage Act illegal

100703 http://www.sacbee.com/2010/07/02/2864531/judge-halts-sacramento-county.html
Judge halts Sacramento County cuts to indigent health care
Rogue Judge Allen Sumner legislated from the bench and ordered the continued freebies to people without any verifiable income.

The cuts were to go into effect this weekend and were an effort to save $7.8 million out of a $1.9 billion general fund budget. The cuts included closure of two medical clinics and halving of services at the one remaining clinic which treated illegal aliens.

AZ Supreme Court: Police must get warrant to do blood alcohol tests
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2529875/posts

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33130832
Oct. 1, 2009
Texas, State District Judge Tena Callahan said the state’s bans on same-sex marriage violates the constitutional guarantee to equal protection under the law.

Richard Kramer-Judge rules separate restrooms unconstitutional, San Francisco.

Brian Gain, King County Superior Court judge. Prosecutor asked judge to remand Kalebu into custody based on mental instability after Kalebu threatened to kill his mother and was a suspect in an arson fire. Kalebu brutally stabbed two women, killing one.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009535081_southpark25m.html

Lawrence K. Karlton, U.S. district court in Sacramento overturns key portion of victims-rights proposition (CA prop 9). He ruled the state must provide attorneys for parole violators when it is considering whether to send them back to prison. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2215763/posts

Orlinda L. Naranjo, state district judge, Austin, blocked the Texas Department of Public Safety from continuing to enforce new rules that prevent some legal immigrants from obtaining driver’s licenses and identification cards.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2226015/posts

Alex Kozinski, chief judge of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, admonished for being judicially imprudent and exhibiting poor judgment by placing sexually explicit photos and videos on an internet server that could be accessed by the public.

Mariana R. Pfaelzer is a United States federal judge
Born 1926
Not Dead Yet
Nominated by president Jimmy Carter in 1978
She is single handedly responsible for thousands of deaths by illegal aliens and for the destruction of California. She is responsible for the millions of Californian families that fled the influx of foreign invaders.
She struck down California’s Proposition 187, a law that was overwhelmingly supported by Californians, 59 percent to 41 percent in 1994. The law would have denied illegals from using free healthcare, public education and social services.

Federal Judge Matthew Byrne was the traitor that initially put a restraining order on 187.

William Highberger
May 12, 2010
Siding with the ACLU, Highberger put a halt to teacher and staff layoffs at Gompers, Liechty and Markham middle schools.
http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/city-news/layoffs-blocked-la-schools/

Thomas Ramich
Elmira city judge
March 24, 2010
Police arrested seven Christians in a park for silent prayers during homosexual festival.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=131521

Ronald Styn
A day laborer who attacked a U.S. photographer at a notorious San Diego day labor site in 2006, was awarded $2,500 in damages for “defamation per se” by judge Ronald Styn in a non-jury trial in San Diego Superior Court.

The Mexican national plaintiff, Alberto Jimenez, who was accused of attacking Los Angeles photographer John Monti, sued San Diego Minutement founder Jeff Schwilk for defamation for calling the illegal immigrant attackers “criminals” when he forwarded an email with Monti’s pictures of Jimenez and six other suspects who were at the scene.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=131521

Peter Arnold
May 24, 1010
CHEYENNE, Wyo. (AP) - In a rare move, a Wyoming judge has blocked two newspapers from publishing stories on an internal report about a college president’s trip to Costa Rica, saying the report was improperly taken and that releasing details could prompt the federal government to cut college grant money.
District Judge Peter Arnold on Friday ordered the Wyoming Tribune Eagle newspaper and a local biweekly paper, The Cheyenne Herald, not to disseminate information about the report for at least 10 days.
According to the Tribune Eagle, the report concerns a school-sponsored trip taken by Laramie County Community College President Darrel Hammon to Costa Rica in 2008. He served as a student chaperone on the trip.

Joseph Tauro
July 19, 2010
Gay-rights advocates scored a major victory Thursday as a federal judge in Boston ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act — a measure Congress passed in 1996 to prevent the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage—is unconstitutional.
Judge Joseph Tauro said the federal government essentially had no business seeking to regulate marriage rules, which he said have traditionally been the exclusive province of the states.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/39518.html#ixzz0vhURDTPu

Jim Hamilton
July 7, 2010
COLUMBIA, Tenn. –Senior Maury County Circuit Court Judge Jim Hamilton is accused of illegally wiping the records clean for felons. http://www.newschannel5.com/Global/story.asp?S=12769611

Jane Boyle
March 25, 2010
DALLAS (CN) - For the third time, a judge has ruled that Farmers Branch, Texas, violated the Constitution by enacting an ordinance that banned undocumented immigrants from renting apartments in the city, and barred landlords from renting to them.
U.S. District Judge Jane Boyle said the ordinance was an attempt to enforce federal immigration laws, which only the federal government can do.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/03/25/25868.htm

James Robertson
March 22, 2010
WASHINGTON — A suspected Al Qaeda organizer once called “the highest value detainee” at Guantanamo Bay was ordered released by a federal judge in an order issued Monday.
Mohamedou Ould Slahi was accused in the 9/11 Commission report of helping recruit Mohammed Atta and other members of the Al Qaeda cell in Hamburg, Germany, that took part in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Military prosecutors suspected Slahi of links to other Al Qaeda operations, and considered seeking the death penalty against him while preparing possible charges in 2003 and 2004.
U.S. District Judge James Robertson granted Slahi’s petition for habeas corpus, effectively finding the government lacked legal grounds to hold him. The order was classified, although the court said it planned to release a redacted public version in the coming weeks.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,589769,00.html

Denis R. Hurley
May 21, 2010
A federal judge is preventing a New York town from enforcing its “unconstitutional” law prohibiting illegal immigrant day laborers from seeking work on public property and people from hiring them.
Oyster Bay, a Long Island town of about 300,000 residents, passed the public safety measure last fall because day laborers—and those who hire them—were creating dangerous traffic situations in the municipality’s main roads. The ordinance prohibits pedestrians from soliciting employment and bars drivers from stopping to hire workers.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/may/judge-bans-enforcement-n-y-day-laborer-law

Christopher C. Piazza
April 19, 2010
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (BP)—An Arkansas judge has overturned the state’s voter-approved law prohibiting adoptions by unmarried couples, a decision critics say will harm children in the foster care and adoption systems who need a stable home with a mother and father.
http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/BPnews.asp?ID=32741

Charles F. Palmer
May 26, 2010
A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge on Wednesday threw out a lawsuit by the parents of a high school football star who had sued the Sheriff’s Department for releasing from jail an illegal immigrant suspected of killing their son.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/05/la-sheriff-cant-be-used-to-releasing-illegal-immigrant-accused-of-killing-football-star-judge-rules.html

James J. Brady
May 20, 2010
A Baton Rouge federal judge said Wednesday he wants details on a plan to tax St Helena Parish residents for public school improvements without calling an election.
http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/94372869.html?showAll=y&c=y

Barbara Crabb
April 15, 2010
Judge: Natl Day Of Prayer Unconstitutional April 15, 2010 by: Mike Levine The National Day of Prayer, honored in the United States for more than a half-century, is unconstitutional, a federal judge in Wisconsin has ruled.
In a 66-page opinion issued Thursday, U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb said the holiday violates the “establishment clause” of the First Amendment, which creates a separation of church and state.
“I understand that many may disagree with that conclusion and some may even view it as a criticism of prayer or those who pray,” Crabb said in her opinion. “That is unfortunate. A determination that the government may not endorse a religious message is not a determination that the message itself is harmful, unimportant or undeserving of dissemination.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2494101/posts

Saundra Brown Armstrong of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
February 25, 2010
Federal judge blocks cuts to California’s adult daycare program

“This is yet another example where the courts have blocked the state from achieving any savings in the (adult day care) program and another example of why we’ve been forced to propose eliminating the program altogether,” said H.D. Palmer, spokesman for the state Finance Department.
“It’s not something that we want to do,” Palmer said, but the state has to bridge a $19.9 billion deficit between now and the end of June 2011.
This week’s injunction is the second to block cuts to Medi-Cal subsidized adult day care, which, if eliminated completely, would save the state’s general fund an estimated $134 million.
Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/02/25/2565623/federal-judge-blocks-cuts-to-californias.html#ixzz0vlfQ4JAh

Nicholas Garaufis
January 25, 2010
Federal Judge Nicholas Garaufis — without a shred of evidence that the FDNY had discriminated against minority applicants — last week imposed strict racial hiring quotas on the department.
For every five new hires, Garaufis ordered, the department must reserve two spots for black applicants and one for Hispanic applicants — until precisely 293 minority firefighters have been hired.
He also ruled that fully 7,400 minority applicants who took the FDNY entrance exam in 1999 and 2002 could claim monetary damages from the city.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/slap_at_the_bravest_T2FbQbH7FNDxo1rRpAfp7O#ixzz0vmAQkSJO


9 posted on 08/05/2010 5:55:28 PM PDT by Haddit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Today, gender is not relevant to the state in determining spouses' obligations to each other. ...

With this kind of overbearing crap it becoming apparent the the state is no longer relevant judge.

10 posted on 08/05/2010 5:56:08 PM PDT by RedMDer (Throw them all out in 2010... Forward with Confidence! Forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Our Framers intended impeachment to be used against out of control judges like Walker. The current notion that a judge cannot be removed for something less than a felony offense is an incredible misunderstanding of our Constitution.

Walker is a tyrant. Absent peaceful removal via impeachment, tyrants rightly fear for their personal safety.


11 posted on 08/05/2010 5:57:12 PM PDT by Jacquerie (We live in a judicial tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Makes me wonder how you can become a judge in this country when you can’t even comprehend the Constitution.


12 posted on 08/05/2010 6:03:57 PM PDT by heshtesh (ueer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I remember back in the day when the voters in California voted 3 or 4 of the state supreme court justices out of office. Does the name Rose Bird ring a bell?
It’s too bad this fag is a federal judge. I don’t know how you get rid of them.


13 posted on 08/05/2010 6:06:04 PM PDT by taillightchaser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Good move. If anyone deserves to be impeached, this judge is IT.

It’s time that we started showing these power drunk judges what the consequences are of these arbitrary, bigoted, unconstitutional decisions.

Throw the bums out!


14 posted on 08/05/2010 6:06:24 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Who on earth picked a gay judge to rule on this case?

Unrelated: Rush’s show today was the best I’ve ever heard. Visit his website now for his major topics. He was eloquent and on fire.


15 posted on 08/05/2010 6:08:57 PM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

With promiscuity being the hallmark of the homosexual relationship, gay marriage is an oxymoron.


16 posted on 08/05/2010 6:10:40 PM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
THIS NEEDS TO BE FRIGGIN' PUSHED TO THE HILT!!!
17 posted on 08/05/2010 6:12:56 PM PDT by no dems (To Every Democrat in the U.S. House and Senate: "Shame, shame. Shame on all your houses.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

The perverted POS judge needs far worse than just booting out of office. A vastly more grisly demise is truly warranted. Re-writing the constitution to justify his own weiner fetish! He’s not just unfit to sit on the bench, he’s unfit to breathe American air.


18 posted on 08/05/2010 6:14:45 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I agree overthrowing State Constitutional law is NOT good behavior! Impeach the injustice!


19 posted on 08/05/2010 6:42:05 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
As we were taught in high school:

Penis erectus non habet conscientiam.


20 posted on 08/05/2010 7:44:22 PM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
The Gay Fallacy:

Argument 1.

Marriage defined, connoted, and denoted since time immemorial in all societies is between a man and a woman, usually in a religious context.

Marriage can also be defined as matrimony, wedded, connubial, from 'nubere', to marry - all define marriage to be between a man and a woman

Ergo marriage was and is defined as a religious and social contract between opposite sexes. Married couples were defined and designated as husband and wife since time immemorial in all societies.

In order to change the definition of (1) marriage, one has to redefine:


2. troth
3. betrothed
4. betrothal
5. engagement
6. fiance'
7. fiancee'
8. Wedding
9. Matrimony
10. connubial
11. conjugal

Thus the term Gay "marriage" does not coincide with nor is inclusive with 10 other definitions pertaining to the definition and etymology of the word 'marriage' and its 10 critical connective historical synonyms and meanings above.

To change the meaning and definition of 11 words etymologically and indisputably set in stone for centuries is to attempt to re-write history.

This is revisionist fiction and propaganda.

To rewrite the dictionary, not to add new words, but to attempt to change the etymological basis and usage of 11 words is a crime, a fraud, a fiction, a prevarication, a lie, a con, a sham, a perjury before all courts who define the truth, evidence the truth and persecute its distorters.

To attempt to change the evidence of language and its meanings is a perjury punishable before any court.

Only recently in the last 500 years has marriage been defined as an act requiring a government "license", always between a man and a woman.

Argument 2.

All marriages between men and women usually, in most cases, produce offspring or have the potential to produce offspring unless a natural defect precludes such.
No gay can have a natural biological gay parent[s].
The gay "marriage" result is no natural children.
Ergo Gay "marriage" cannot have a natural family.

Argument 3.
Real marriages usually produce offspring.
Gay "marriages" cannot reproduce natural offspring.

Argument 4.


Gay "marriage" cannot have a natural family.
Ergo gay "marriage" appears to be non-natural family.


Fact: Real defined marriage is the foundation of all societies.
Fact: Societies cannot exist and perpetuate posterity without real marriages, common-law and lawful.
Fact: Gay "marriages" cannot perpetuate posterity societies.
Gay "marriage" appears to be non-societal.
Ergo gay marriage cannot be a social contract because it is non-societal.


Gay "marriage" appears to be an oxymoron.
Thus gay "marriage" appears to be an aberration of normal society.
Gay "marriage" appears to usurp the social word 'marriage' and its real meaning, definition and purpose for its own aberrated non-social purpose.

Conclusion: Gay "marriages" cannot perpetuate themselves naturally in society [Argument 4.]
Gay "marriages" are dependent upon real marriages for new members in order to perpetuate future gay "marriages".
Thus real marriage is superior to gay "marriage".
Ergo, Because real marriage is superior to gay "marriage, the former and the later are unequal.

If the real marriage and gay "marriage" are not equal in FACT, they cannot be equal under the law.

Gay "marriage" is merely an impostor of real marriage because it cannot be inclusive of the 11 above words synonymous with the word 'marriage'.

Therefore there cannot be equal protection under the law for gay "marriages" because gay "marriage" is inferior to real marriage, merely in an impostor of real marriages and cannot be treated as genuine and equal to real marriage under the same jurisprudence determinations.

Gay "marriage" seeks to redefine 11 marriage words in the dictionary, but must rely upon the actual living real marriage in order to survive through societal posterity..

This is akin to the quack trying to practice medicine, calling himself a doctor, but rushing to the real doctor every time the quack is sick. verbum sat.

21 posted on 08/05/2010 8:35:56 PM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson