Judge's personal life debated after gay ruling

Associated Press ^ | August 6, 2010 | Lisa Leff

[rockinqsranch]

Agree.

[Gasshog]

LOL! Thanks i needed a good chuckle.

[Gasshog]

LOL! Thanks i needed a good chuckle.

[RightFighter]

He bears a striking resemblance to someone...

[Godwin1]

Well, yes. The opinion is nothing more than the judge’s personal opinion that 5000 years of recorded history and tradition count for nothing when weighed against his own post-modern moral relativism. Because the judge believes that unnatural sex acts repugnant to the wholesome imagination are legitimate, he feels authorized to overturn history, tradition and the specifically expressed will of the people of California. The fact that the judge himself is a sexual deviant is quite relevant.

[SeaHawkFan]

This judge made two clearly erroneous rulings in homosexual-related cases and the defense did not disqualify him when they had the chance?

Tells me the defense didn't want to win this case.

[Elsie]

{---}

[happygrl]

"A powerful all-male club

Nambla?

TOUCHE!!!!!!

[happygrl]

Hey, you’re posting on your blog again!

Terrific!

Please post on what they think of 0bama in your side of the world.

[trisham]

:)