Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forced to Retire, Some Take Social Security Early (to stay afloat)
ABC News ^ | 8/08/10 | MATT SEDENSKY

Posted on 08/08/2010 12:38:35 PM PDT by Libloather

Forced to Retire, Some Take Social Security Early
Unable to find work, unemployed turn to reduced Social Security checks early to stay afloat
The Associated Press
By MATT SEDENSKY
MIAMI August 8, 2010

Paul Skidmore's office is shuttered, his job gone, his 18-month job search fruitless and his unemployment benefits exhausted. So at 63, he plans to file this week for Social Security benefits, three years earlier than planned.

"All I want to do is work," said Skidmore, of Finksburg, Md., who was an insurance claims adjuster for 37 years before his company downsized and closed his office last year. "And nobody will hire me."

It is one of the most striking fallouts from the bad economy: Social Security is facing its first-ever shortfall this year as a wave of people like Skidmore opt to collect payments before their full retirement age. Adding to the strain on the trust are reduced tax collections sapped by the country's historic unemployment — still at 9.5 percent.

More people filed for Social Security in 2009 — 2.74 million — than any year in history, and there was a marked increase in the number receiving reduced benefits because they filed ahead of their full retirement age. The increase came as the full Social Security retirement age rose last year from 65 to 66.

Nearly 72 percent of men who filed opted for early benefits in 2009, up from 58 percent the previous year. More women also filed — 74.7 percent in 2009 compared with 64.2 percent the previous year.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hussein; retire; security; social
In case you haven't heard -

Social Security: More going out than coming in

Social Security and Medicare: Even Worse Deal for Younger Workers

Social Security Jitters? Better Prepare Now

1 posted on 08/08/2010 12:38:38 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
They seem to present this as "times are tough and so Social Security has encountered a bump in the road".

A) It's a Ponzi Scheme and it was always doomed to failure.
B) Baby Boomers are retiring -- this was predictable about, oh, 50 years ago.

The current Depression may have accelerated some of the issues, but the bottom line is that Social Security isn't going to be there for people. It's a sham.

2 posted on 08/08/2010 12:43:04 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I’m grabbing mine as soon as I can


3 posted on 08/08/2010 12:44:02 PM PDT by Krankor (What a field day for the heat. A thousand people in the street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

There’s another reason I have heard discussed for the wave of early retirees signing up for Social Security at age 62.

That reason is that they want to get in the system now, before any changes are made to benefits or qualifying for them. They think that any changes made to Social Security will not be imposed on those currently drawing benefits. So, the reasoning goes, take the reduced benefit now and hope and expect that you won’t be impacted by future changes.

We all know Social Security is a financial train wreck. The only question is, what will happen to the system to bring it back to solvency/sanity? Who will have benefits cut and what will the retirement age/other qualifications be to get benefits?


4 posted on 08/08/2010 12:46:40 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

Me also. I want to get some of my money back even if it’s less than what I’d get waiting 4 years.


5 posted on 08/08/2010 12:49:32 PM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Social Security will be around for a long time, but with progressively higher retirement age and more of the benefits taxable, and possibly, a means test at some point.

It was never meant to provide a living, and it never will be enough for that. It would be ideal if it could be privatized but the politics never will permit it.

6 posted on 08/08/2010 12:51:06 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Bet we see more putting their parents on Medicaid too. Some have been shifting assets away from their parents for decades to use the system. But most don’t. In addition, those whose parents do not have money but do themselves and are picking up the tab for what Medicare does not cover will start to eye Medicaid.

This is what socialism does. It makes people who are responsible feel like chumps. Sooner or later those who would never had considered gaming the system, jump right into the game.


7 posted on 08/08/2010 12:53:28 PM PDT by Brugmansian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

All the more reason for Dr. Mengele and the Federal “health care” death panels to get up and running...


8 posted on 08/08/2010 1:03:22 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Mr G has filed to receive his benefits at age 62. The first reason is to get in the system. The second is that we have a child under the age of 18, so he gets half the value of Mr G’s SS every month, and as our child’s caregiver I get half. So, doubling Mr G’s SS at age 62, even for just 7 years, looked like the smart thing to do.


9 posted on 08/08/2010 1:11:42 PM PDT by Grammy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

Amen. Take the money and run, because it’s gonna crash like any Ponzi Scheme.

Always, always, take the money first.


10 posted on 08/08/2010 1:13:12 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (How many plagues must Phara0bama bring before he Let's The People Go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Whazza matter? Dont you trust your government’s promises? Look at what the gov said back in 1964!

http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssa/usa1964-2.html

Self-Supporting

“The program is designed so that contributions plus interest on the investments of the social security trust funds will be sufficient to meet all of the costs of benefits and administration, now and into the indefinite future—without any subsidy from the general funds of the Government. Both the Congress and the Executive Branch, regardless of political party in power, have scrupulously provided in advance for full financing of all liberalizations in the program.”

And HERE is where the money goes!

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/ProgData/fundFAQ.html#n4

See! Nothing to worry about! Now, move along!


11 posted on 08/08/2010 1:17:09 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( Viva los SB 1070)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

My husband and I are screwed. We have at least seven years on his and twelve on mine to collect at the earliest. I don’t blame you guys getting whatever you can get now. It’s all been a sham.


12 posted on 08/08/2010 1:26:12 PM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I filed two weeks ago reasoning that if I waited until the ripe old age of seventy to retire, I would get a big fat zero(like the country!).

Since my engineering skills have not been in demand for some time, the reduction in income won’t be an issue.


13 posted on 08/08/2010 1:26:37 PM PDT by Big_Harry ( Starve the Beast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
I’m grabbing mine as soon as I can

SSA's web page will give you the numbers you need to calculate the different scenarios.
http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10147.html#monthlypaymentsdiffer
The only unknown is your date of death. In most cases you are better off by doing as you suggest and cash out at 62. The longer you live the more the choice moves toward the mandatory 70 retirement age.

The only people who will absolutely benefit by waiting are those who live forever. Waiting past 70 DOES NOT continue to increase your benefits

Regards,
GtG

14 posted on 08/08/2010 1:30:58 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

pinged for later thanks


15 posted on 08/08/2010 1:42:02 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyvet

I’m so glad there are people getting up early to go to the SALT MINES and slaving all day to make sure “I” get my Social Security check every month!

I never thought I would see any Social Security, now I am s#!ting in tall cotton!

But next year I might be standing, saying “Welcome to Walmart”! that is, if there is a walmart then!


16 posted on 08/08/2010 1:47:42 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( Viva los SB 1070)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
It was never meant to provide a living, and it never will be enough for that.

It was meant to addict the middle class to a form of welfare, so that tney would support the government in its program of buying votes with other people's money.

Before SS, elderly parents would live with their kids after they could no longer work. Having kids and raising them was the way you "paid in" to that system.

Nowadays, the gummint takes money from all workers, including you and your kids, and gives out a little bit of that to anybody who will apply, including those who had no kids by "choice", and even illegals who paid nothing in at all.

It's pure socialism: the government takes from the provident and gives to the profligate, ensuring a plentiful supply of voters from the latter group.

As long as the producers let them, that is. Even if we can't vote them out, we can stop feeding them.

17 posted on 08/08/2010 1:51:13 PM PDT by thulldud (Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Just think all these people were counted as on the Unemployment rolls and are now retired.That helps obumbo even more


18 posted on 08/08/2010 1:51:49 PM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

So are you turning yours down? What’s your point?


19 posted on 08/08/2010 1:59:16 PM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

As a general rule it’s always better to take Social Security as soon one is elegible given the fickleness of life. You culd be killed by something the day after you apply for full Social Security.

In any case, the penalty is not big enough to take the risk.


20 posted on 08/08/2010 2:01:07 PM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

That’s what I’m thinking.. Get grandfathered in before then cut it.. I figure if I wait till 65, the rate will be what I’d get at 62.. - 7.5 years away for me. lot can happen..


21 posted on 08/08/2010 2:03:06 PM PDT by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Everyone I’ve talked to says to get started drawing SS as soon as you’re eligible and don’t worry about the reduced benefit, because anything can change during those 3 or 4 years. Just like the companies who dropped 401K match, or cut retiree healthcare, or even dropped their pension plans altogether. There’s times when a person has to think about taking care of #1.


22 posted on 08/08/2010 2:10:25 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Forced to retire? No, only if you give up. And the government of the socialist Marxist left WANTS you dependent on them so don’t give them the satisfaction. I am FULLY intending to retire when I want to and to NOT expect a single cent of the socialist insecurity.


23 posted on 08/08/2010 2:11:46 PM PDT by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I took SS at 62 years of age.

Concerned with rule changes

Also calculated that it’d take 11 years to recoup the amount I would not have collected if I had waited to draw the higher amount. At the time I questioned whether I’d last 11 more years so it was a no brainer. It looks like I’ll make it but I’m not sorry about my decision.

With the uncertainty involved you had better take it as early as possible.


24 posted on 08/08/2010 2:14:30 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
SS is bankrupt. Count not upon it.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

25 posted on 08/08/2010 2:27:11 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
I am trying to do that. It occurred to me that when I hit 67 there probably won't be any SS at all or that inflation will be at 100% and SS will have been cut 50%. I wouldn't get much anyway, $730 or so, but with my continuing employment I should get a couple of hundred a month. At the SS office the lady took my paperwork and said I would never get social security. With some discussion she said I could get an attorney and perhaps I could get SS sometime. So I can pay over whatever money I might draw from SS to hire a lawyer in order to possibly receive SS. In Việt Nam I would assume the implication is that I would have to give the clerk a gift or that my offering was insufficient. Here, I suppose If I offered the requisite bribe and it were not enough I would be arrested and jailed on a federal charge of trying to bribe a government clerk.
26 posted on 08/08/2010 2:33:00 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (di tray hoi den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grammy

The smart thing to do is to get what you can when you van get it. You have paid in money all your working life and the payout is likely not going to be there after a couple more years. hat I actually expect is for SS payments to stay static while inflation goes Weimar.


27 posted on 08/08/2010 2:36:05 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (di tray hoi den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Employers want younger, cheaper workers who won’t be using health care.


28 posted on 08/08/2010 3:29:32 PM PDT by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, retired Military, disabled & Seniors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

There is a way to refund to SSA the money you have received to date and reapply to get the larger monthly amount associated with being older when one starts. It’s crazy, but true.


29 posted on 08/08/2010 3:48:35 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ladyvet

**So are you turning yours down? What’s your point?**

Forty years ago I talked with my military buddies and we all felt we would never actually draw any Social Security as the program would eventually fail.

Now I am actually getting a check, and am so glad others are still out there working like slaves and paying into Social Security to keep me in dollars!

But next year I may have to get a real job again if the program fails!


30 posted on 08/08/2010 4:03:03 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( Viva los SB 1070)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Forty years ago I talked with my military buddies and we all felt we would never actually draw any Social Security as the program would eventually fail.

Wow, in 1970 at the age of 24 you were actually talking about this? I'm impressed at your wisdom beyond your years at the time...series.

31 posted on 08/08/2010 4:22:46 PM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Anybody know what interest rate we’re paying ourseves for these securities ?


32 posted on 08/08/2010 4:32:39 PM PDT by PLMerite (The FR clock is now three minutes fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ladyvet

***Wow, in 1970 at the age of 24 you were actually talking about this? I’m impressed at your wisdom beyond your years at the time...series.***

That’s right! and in 1972, I talked about it with my Sister-in-law, because we all knew it was a scam even then. I am surprised I am getting SS today!


33 posted on 08/08/2010 4:42:48 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( Viva los SB 1070)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

I’m leading edge boomer...I’m taking mine the minute I qualify (about two years to go).


34 posted on 08/08/2010 4:48:50 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
So you knew since you were 24 it was a scam but you didn't plan ahead that it might run out and you might be working at Wal-Mart next year as a greeter, and still you belittle those of us that are paying for it now? Okaaay, whatever dude.
35 posted on 08/08/2010 4:53:06 PM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian; Liz; AT7Saluki; writer33
SS is bankrupt. Count not upon it.

I just want my loot back now. I, under no duress, opt out of the so-called 'plan'. No interest, no dividends, just my original 'contributions' up to this point.

36 posted on 08/08/2010 6:07:22 PM PDT by Libloather (Teapublican, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
I’m taking mine the minute I qualify (about two years to go).

Unless they bump up the age limitations - eh? Think Commiecare™.

37 posted on 08/08/2010 6:09:46 PM PDT by Libloather (Teapublican, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
Anybody know what interest rate we’re paying ourseves for these securities ?

Well between myself and my employers, about 240 grand has been "contributed" to my account up to age 62 and I'm eligible to get 1700 a month.

That does not include the 63 grand to Medicare.

38 posted on 08/08/2010 6:20:11 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ladyvet

***So you knew since you were 24 it was a scam but you didn’t plan ahead that it might run out and you might be working at Wal-Mart next year as a greeter, and still you belittle those of us that are paying for it now?***

Now pay close attention....At 24, we knew it was a scam but could do nothing about it. Years later we landed good jobs which allowed us to stash money in a 401-k. My younger brother was able to retire before I did due to the fact he saved every extra dime he had.

After thirty one years of working I retired, took Social Security AND began drawing on my savings ans private pension. If I loose my Social security tomorrow I will no go hungry.

It has taken me years to get this set up for my retirement and even though I lost a huge ammount in the crash just before I retired I am not going to go hungry.

If I loose social security I may have to go over to walmart and see about getting a job but I still draw enough through my private anuities that I will not be destitute. I already have a list of things I WILL give up if I have to.

My poor old mama(now deceased) retired years ago and still worked for about ten years in a low paying job. She was so frugal she managed to save enough to pay cash for an automobile and still had money left over.

And just for the record, I am NOT bringing in as much retirement cash as I did when I was working.

Meanwhile I still love to razz my co workers about slaving in the Salt Mines keeping me in the “lifestyle I am accustomed to!”


39 posted on 08/08/2010 6:33:21 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( Viva los SB 1070)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Now pay close attention....Meanwhile I still love to razz my co workers about slaving in the Salt Mines keeping me in the “lifestyle I am accustomed to!”....Okaaay, you made your point. Enough already. I think we all know what your all about.
40 posted on 08/08/2010 11:07:29 PM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Some of the comments at the bottom of the original article (click and scroll down to comments) are interesting.

For example, #10 by Clifford:

Republicans are saying, “NO!” not because they are acting like a bunch of 5 year olds,
Republicans are saying, “NO!” because they are DEALING with a bunch of 5 year olds!

41 posted on 08/10/2010 7:10:47 AM PDT by Jess Kitting (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big_Harry

Now you have the best of both...... You have the SS and are free to do whatever you want.

There is at least one skill in your bag that can be used to earn. Work some loaf some...... it’s the way of the new world for old engineers


42 posted on 08/10/2010 7:18:36 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bert

I’ve already found a niche market for good used cars,and I’ve always been a motor head.


43 posted on 08/10/2010 2:51:54 PM PDT by Big_Harry ( Starve the Beast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson