Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA chooses Edwards in Texas (Chet Edwards, TX-17, is a Democrat)
Politico ^ | 8/9/10 | Kasie Hunt

Posted on 08/09/2010 6:54:50 PM PDT by randita

NRA chooses Edwards in Texas By: Kasie Hunt August 9, 2010 06:57 PM EDT

Texas Rep. Chet Edwards is the latest endangered Democrat to win a critical conservative credential: an endorsement from the National Rifle Association.

Edwards’s campaign announced he had received the pro-gun rights organization’s backing on Monday. "I cannot imagine any candidate in our district who would not want the endorsement of the NRA Victory Fund, which is by far the largest gun rights organization in the country,” Edwards spokesman Megan Jacobs said in a statement.

Edwards is facing self-funded businessman Bill Flores, who has attacked him for voting in favor of the bank bailout and the stimulus bill.

“Bill Flores is a strong supporter of the 2nd amendment, filled out a perfect NRA questionnaire that received an AQ rating, is a life member of the NRA and the Texas State Rifle Association and has already been endorsed by Gun Owners of America. Bill will never receive an F rating from the NRA as Congressman Edwards did in 2003,” said Flores campaign manager Matt Mackowiak.

Edwards has been a GOP target for nearly a decade and has yet to lose a race—even though former President George W. Bush calls his district home.

Still, the national political environment is working against him, and Republicans have been quick to note Flores’s internal polling shows him ahead.

Both Edwards and Flores raised over $600,000 between April and June, though Edwards is sitting on more than $2.1 million in cash to Flores’s $415,000.

That makes the NRA endorsement all the more welcome—and Edwards isn’t the only vulnerable Democrat to win NRA support this year. Mississippi Rep. Travis Childers and Virginia Rep. Rick Boucher also have the group’s backing, a welcome endorsement for both.

Ties with conservative congressional Democrats have been key for the NRA. The group’s influence allowed it to negotiate a loophole in sweeping campaign finance legislation designed to limit outside groups’ influence in elections. The bill, dubbed the DISCLOSE Act, didn’t pass muster in the Senate.

But the NRA has taken flak from its conservative membership for supporting candidates on the left— and has been particularly roiled by suggestions it would endorse endangered Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The group ultimately issued a statement saying it had not yet made a decision about whether to endorse Reid.

© 2010 Capitol News Company, LLC


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; chetedwards; nra; texas; ushouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: Tucker39

If the NRA has to only endose insiders then the NRA is a complete failure.

The NRA should be able to say that ANYONE can take office and would have a pro second amendment mindset.

Endorsing a democrat is a demonstration of NRA failure.


21 posted on 08/09/2010 7:09:44 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: randita
This will only hurt the NRA. It will have zero impact on the elections. I do not think the NRA endorsement of a socialist is going to swing any vote one way or another. However it will upset NRA members which the majority of them are Republicans and Conservatives and many of them will leave the organization.
22 posted on 08/09/2010 7:09:57 PM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

The NRA is not getting my financial assistance any longer.

I am now a member of Gun Owners of America.

They are ROCK SOLID as opposed to the NRA.


23 posted on 08/09/2010 7:10:40 PM PDT by Howie66 (I can see November from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pavegunner72

The NRA should be able to say that ANYONE can take office and would have a pro second amendment mindset.

Endorsing a democrat is a demonstration of NRA failure.


24 posted on 08/09/2010 7:11:19 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: randita

By endorsing the Democrat Edwards, the NRA will not get our membership
renewal.

Glad we waited. Mine membership is up this month. Hubby’s was up last month.

Looks like they finally got to the NRA. What has happened? More corruption? Sold out for something in return? What’s left?


25 posted on 08/09/2010 7:11:44 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

I think the NRA has become something like AARP... too big, too close to crooked politicians, and completely out of touch with it’s original charter.


26 posted on 08/09/2010 7:13:28 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

In 1994 I ran against an entrenched Democrat for a Texas house seat. My opponent had voted against the Texas concealed carry bill twice while I was strongly advocating FOR that measure. The NRA endorsed him over me after which I promptly removed my name from the roles of the NRA and joined GOA. Never been sorry for doing so.


27 posted on 08/09/2010 7:14:35 PM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
That's the point ~ any time you vote for a Democrat for a legislative body you vote for the Democrat leadership.

The NRA top dogs probably imagine Pelosi will have them slaughtered last.

28 posted on 08/09/2010 7:15:37 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Chet Edwards is a life-long career politician!

When will the people wake up, I mean really wake up and realize these career politicians are the reason for the economics mess we have.

The soon-to-be Depression after this Recession is solely Congress-caused!

29 posted on 08/09/2010 7:18:12 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound (Pseudo-President has arisen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: randita
Thought I would never have to say this, but FU NRA!
They are dead to me from now on.
30 posted on 08/09/2010 7:19:41 PM PDT by The Cajun (Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
Chet Edwards is the latest endangered Democrat to win a critical conservative credential: an endorsement from the National Rifle Association.

Really? The NRA? Conservative? What's "conservative" about backing a leftist?

31 posted on 08/09/2010 7:20:25 PM PDT by 50cal Smokepole (Effective gun control involves effective recoil management)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
That's the point ~ any time you vote for a Democrat for a legislative body you vote for the Democrat leadership.

pfft. That would mean any time we vote Repub we are voting for Steele and the RNC.

32 posted on 08/09/2010 7:20:51 PM PDT by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: randita
“Bill Flores is a strong supporter of the 2nd amendment, filled out a perfect NRA questionnaire that received an AQ rating, is a life member of the NRA and the Texas State Rifle Association and has already been endorsed by Gun Owners of America. Bill will never receive an F rating from the NRA as Congressman Edwards did in 2003,” said Flores campaign manager Matt Mackowiak.

NRA may not be a Republican organization, but when NRA support CommieCrates who vote for the bailout against a Republican 2nd Amendment supporting candidate, I Object. I will give NRA not another dime.

33 posted on 08/09/2010 7:21:25 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

http://gunowners.org/


34 posted on 08/09/2010 7:22:41 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

ping


35 posted on 08/09/2010 7:22:59 PM PDT by erman (democrats are like flies, whatever they don't eat they sh#t on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50cal Smokepole

A “Conservative” Democrat today is the same as a “moderate” muslim. In other words, there ain’t no such thing.

Any Democrat will say anything to get elected, and once elected, the spots show through.Anyone who believes anything a Democrat says while running for office does so at their own peril. And to put it gently, are not wise.


36 posted on 08/09/2010 7:25:03 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: randita

The NRA does not hate the Tea Party. The NRA has always been a non-political organization with a single purpose: to protect gun ownership.

Their rules for political endorsement are published every two years in their magazines. The rules are designed to gain support for gun ownership. Roughly, endorse whoever supports guns the most with actions (not words); in case of a tie, go with the incumbent (I suppose because they have more influence).

I hope Sen. Reid will be their exception. However, if they break their own rules, incumbent Democrats will take notice, and they will be harder to influence in the future.

The NRA has been extremely successful in what it does… supporting gun ownership. Every two years they restate: The NRA is not a political organization… political party has nothing to do with the decision… nor do other issues have anything to do with the decision... the NRA is a single issue organization.

NRA believes their endorsement rules are why they can be so influential on Capitol Hill.
years.


37 posted on 08/09/2010 7:25:21 PM PDT by RCFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pavegunner72

I would mention this endorsement to them and point out that an endorsement of Chet Edwards is an endorsement of Pelosi and Reid. There is no distinction.


38 posted on 08/09/2010 7:26:00 PM PDT by randita (Visit keyhouseraces.com for a list of vulnerable DEM and must hold GOP House seats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: randita

The only thing that surprises me about this is that anyone would be surprised about this. I let my membership lapse a couple of years ago after they continued to support John Murtha. They keep sending me crap in the mail and I keep throwing it into the trash.


39 posted on 08/09/2010 7:26:05 PM PDT by Jaxter ("Pro Aris et Focis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura

Ditto...cancelled my membership a number of years ago, as well.


40 posted on 08/09/2010 7:28:14 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson