This junk originally got fed to the court by the plaintiffs. Walker ate it up like it was cat treats. Any sane judge would have screened it out as irrelevant.
From Wikipedia, we have ... “Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, opposed his nomination because of his perceived “insensitivity” to gays and the poor”
Agreed. Judge Walker, you’ve made your assertions. Unless you’re full of hot air, PROVE THEM or show yourself the door! Maybe you’ve told yourself that, since it is within your power to make this ruling, that, since it falls in line with your personal opinion, that it is right and just to do so. How can you sleep, knowing the travesty you have made of the LAW, something a judge should hold in such high regard, as nothing else in their lives. Have you no shame, sir?
There is no way that this man should have sat on the bench for this proceeding. His incoherent ramblings attest to that. There is not any ambiguity in what is intended by the contract of marriage, and there is nobody who does not understand that, except for people like this man, Judge Vaughn Walker, who deliberately pervert it to purvey their giddy ‘Alice in Wonderland’ view of society.
Enough is enough! The time has come to stop listening to goofballs like Judge Walker.
Interesting that the comments on this article in the Wash Times are from four different new users with random character user names and all have the same annoyed tone carping about alleged bigotry and homophobia of Prop 8 supporters. I suspect these comments were all written by the same person.