Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The more we find out about this openly queer judge, Vaughn Walker, the more he is exposed as just another militant activist homosexual. There is no way his absurd ruling will stand. What next - are we going to appoint proud pedophile judges to preside over child molestation cases? What about avowed polygamist judges to sit in charge of polygamy cases? Hello? Vaughn Walker has no right to push his San Francisco values onto the voters who overwhelmingly voted to reject his lifestyle and artificial male/male 'marriages'.
1 posted on 08/11/2010 4:23:33 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DesertRenegade
It's weird that anyone at all would want the state to sanction their marriage. Who the hell cares what some stinking pols thinks?

2 posted on 08/11/2010 4:28:30 PM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

This junk originally got fed to the court by the plaintiffs. Walker ate it up like it was cat treats. Any sane judge would have screened it out as irrelevant.


3 posted on 08/11/2010 4:32:24 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

From Wikipedia, we have ... “Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, opposed his nomination because of his perceived “insensitivity” to gays and the poor”


4 posted on 08/11/2010 4:32:32 PM PDT by OldNavyVet (One trillion days, at 365 days per year, is 2,739,726,027 years ... almost 3 billion years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Agreed. Judge Walker, you’ve made your assertions. Unless you’re full of hot air, PROVE THEM or show yourself the door! Maybe you’ve told yourself that, since it is within your power to make this ruling, that, since it falls in line with your personal opinion, that it is right and just to do so. How can you sleep, knowing the travesty you have made of the LAW, something a judge should hold in such high regard, as nothing else in their lives. Have you no shame, sir?


5 posted on 08/11/2010 4:32:49 PM PDT by sayuncledave (A cruce salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

8 posted on 08/11/2010 4:54:31 PM PDT by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

There is no way that this man should have sat on the bench for this proceeding. His incoherent ramblings attest to that. There is not any ambiguity in what is intended by the contract of marriage, and there is nobody who does not understand that, except for people like this man, Judge Vaughn Walker, who deliberately pervert it to purvey their giddy ‘Alice in Wonderland’ view of society.

Enough is enough! The time has come to stop listening to goofballs like Judge Walker.


9 posted on 08/11/2010 4:55:58 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Interesting that the comments on this article in the Wash Times are from four different new users with random character user names and all have the same annoyed tone carping about alleged bigotry and homophobia of Prop 8 supporters. I suspect these comments were all written by the same person.


10 posted on 08/11/2010 4:57:03 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
I don't want to have to satisfy the ill considered questions and foolish notions of ppl like you.. in government.

13 posted on 08/12/2010 10:17:52 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson