Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Denies Involvement in Sestak-Gate, Contradicts White House and Sestak Version of Events
Oversight & Government Committee ^ | Wednesday August 11, 2010 | Oversight & Government Committee

Posted on 08/11/2010 7:13:41 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

In February, allegations that someone inside the Obama White House offered Pennsylvania Senate Democratic nominee and three-star Navy Admiral Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) a job in exchange for his withdrawal from the PA Senate Primary race were made by Sestak himself. In late-May, White House Counsel Robert Bauer released a memo claiming that “The White House Chief of Staff enlisted the support of former President Clinton who agreed to raise with Congressman Sestak options of service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board. Congressman Sestak declined the suggested alternatives, remaining committed to his Senate candidacy.”

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Ranking Member Darrell Issa (R-CA) responded, “You know the saying there’s three sides to every story, well, now we have it. Admiral Sestak has repeatedly said he was offered a ‘job’ in an effort to obtain his withdrawal from the Senate Primary. The White House has said ‘efforts were made in June AND July” in said job as well as the admission that they ‘enlisted’ former President Clinton to make the overture. President Clinton says he ‘never tried to get Sestak out of the race.’ Who’s telling the truth?”

WBRE-TV has reported that former President Bill Clinton, who until yesterday has not spoken publicly on the controversy, denied any involvement in trying to maneuver Sestak out of the race:

“Clinton denied it to EyeWitness news, saying he never tried to get Sestak out of the race and has never been accused of it.” (WBRE-TV, 8/10/10)

(Excerpt) Read more at republicans.oversight.house.gov ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corruption; democrats; democratswar; elections; front; frontpage; obama; sestak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Bigtigermike

HAH! Too funny, we all knew it was a lie and Slick is confirming it! HAH!


21 posted on 08/11/2010 7:48:34 PM PDT by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 -Happy B'day Daddy 2/20/23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

Hey Barry, that little lie that you and your band of fools put together does not seem like it is going to fly much farther. Too bad this did not get to the Blago courtroom on time to save him but your day is coming Barry.


22 posted on 08/11/2010 7:49:41 PM PDT by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/08/11/clinton-backing-away-from-sestak-story/

After reading this I see all kinds of wiggle room depending on exactly what Clinton said.

For example,

” former President Bill Clinton has finally spoken and denied the White House explanation that he met with Joe Sestak to offer him an administration job to drop out of the Democratic Primary against soon to be former Senator Specter.”

Operative words “met” “to” “offer”


23 posted on 08/11/2010 7:53:48 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I love this comment on that site:

“I did
not
have
Sestak relations with that hoodlum–Mr Obama…”


24 posted on 08/11/2010 8:00:03 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

“I Just Want You To Know That I NEVER Had Sexual Relations With That Woman(Ms.Lewinsky),And I Never Once Asked Anyone To Lie”!


25 posted on 08/11/2010 8:01:33 PM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I wonder if this is why Clinton backed Romanoff? Payback for either being used OR for being betrayed.

Popcorn time


26 posted on 08/11/2010 8:02:35 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim35
I thought that it was very telling that BO and MO weren’t invited to Chelsea’s wedding.

Odd, but did they invite the other former Presidents?

27 posted on 08/11/2010 8:08:17 PM PDT by pray4liberty (dare I say it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

“President Bush was invited to the Clinton wedding and declined.”

OMG! I did not know Bush was invited. LOL, no wonder the Kenyan was so pouty about it. That was a double Beotch slap from the Clintons. I’ll bet MO already had an ugly outfit picked out to wear and was thinking that her two girls would be the flower girls. Even though Mo reportedly hates Hillary I’m sure she was very angry to be dissed by whitey.
(Jim’s W)


28 posted on 08/11/2010 8:10:50 PM PDT by jim35 (Tea Party former Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bandleader
It's better seeing the real thing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSDAXGXGiEw

This picture says a lot to me.
Slicker than Slick..watch your Back Obamanazi...Clintons are coming after you.
29 posted on 08/11/2010 8:13:55 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty

“Odd, but did they invite the other former Presidents?”

Apparently, Bush? The point is, 0bama gave Hillary her position. I’m fairly sure that he fully epected to be invited. Hell, knowing BO and MO, I’m sure they expected it to be all about them. (Jim’s W)


30 posted on 08/11/2010 8:19:44 PM PDT by jim35 (Tea Party former Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

So Slick is setting up hussein for the fall so the Hildabeast has a better shot at the presidency in 2012
************************************************
Wow, could not have said it better! We knew this was coming.


31 posted on 08/11/2010 8:20:45 PM PDT by DefeatCorruption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jim35
OMG! I did not know Bush was invited. LOL, no wonder the Kenyan was so pouty about it. That was a double Beotch slap from the Clintons.

Wonder which President Bush it was, tho (or maybe both)?
32 posted on 08/11/2010 8:21:12 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Why does this story have visibility again, now?
33 posted on 08/11/2010 8:29:33 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

I bet the Carters were not invited.


34 posted on 08/11/2010 8:31:20 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

“Wonder which President Bush it was, tho (or maybe both)?”

I don’t know, tonight was the first time I’d heard that Bush was invited. What is significant to me is that the 0bamas were NOT invited. I saw 0bama interviewed and he looked PO’d when he was asked about it. His eyes had that ugly, hard look they get when he’s feeling picked on and angry. (Jim’s W)


35 posted on 08/11/2010 8:50:57 PM PDT by jim35 (Tea Party former Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

“Obama is a child in this politics game compared to the Clinton’s”
True dat!


36 posted on 08/11/2010 8:56:20 PM PDT by griswold3 ('Regulation and law without enforcement is no law at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I get it the dem’s are trying to stretch our investigative resources thin with all theses scandals.


37 posted on 08/11/2010 9:00:26 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
"WOW" is right.If Slick Willie is back pedaling, to cover his ample behind, then this investigation must have legs.

Won't hurt the Missus either.

38 posted on 08/12/2010 3:50:38 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson