Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge to announce Prop 8 stay ruling
UPI ^ | Aug 12, 2010 | UPI

Posted on 08/11/2010 9:53:59 PM PDT by DesertRenegade

The judge who threw out California's ban on gay marriage said Wednesday he is prepared to decide whether to stay his ruling pending appeal.

U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, chief of the court in San Francisco, ruled last week that Proposition 8, adopted by California voters in 2008, is unconstitutional. The court said he plans to issue his decision on a stay Thursday morning.

Walker issued a temporary stay last week. If he decides to keep his ruling from taking effect pending appeal, same-sex couples might be barred from marriage in California for several years, the Los Angeles Times said.

The case is expected to go to the U.S. Supreme Court.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; homosexualagenda; prop8; ruling; sodomite; vaughnwalker
If Judge Walker, an avowed homosexual, tries to lift the stay - the people of California need to action and impeach this activist fraud from office. The vast majority of people used the legislative system and voted against homosexual 'marriage'. It's a complete miscarriage of justice to then allow some liberal activist slime to reject the will of the people.
1 posted on 08/11/2010 9:54:02 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

If he can come up with a fig leaf that he thinks will get past the appellates, he jolly well won’t stay it.


2 posted on 08/11/2010 9:56:09 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Ahnold and Moonbeam both gave him cover.

Consider it lifted.


3 posted on 08/11/2010 9:58:13 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

This judge really opened up a can of worms. What a mess.


4 posted on 08/11/2010 10:02:09 PM PDT by ILS21R ("Every night before I go to sleep, I think who would throw stones at me?", she said)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

This is the problem with having unelected judges.


5 posted on 08/11/2010 10:02:53 PM PDT by CAluvdubya ("Sarah Palin fights, we cannot spare her."--GonzoGOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

He is a federal judge. Congress can impeach him, not the “people of California.”


6 posted on 08/11/2010 10:06:14 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

If the people’s will at the polls can be overturned by a Leftist judge, then elections no longer have any meaning.

The only option left for the conservative majority is revolution.


7 posted on 08/11/2010 10:13:51 PM PDT by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

They were talking about this on Fox 11 news here, showed a bunch of gay men kissing each other, made me almost lose my dinner. Of course everyone here in the local media has a huge smile on their face whenever they are discussing the ruling


8 posted on 08/11/2010 10:14:37 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I know he is not elected, but there must be some mechanism to remove a negligent judge from the bench. If a judge literally loses his mind, can’t they force him to step down?


9 posted on 08/11/2010 10:23:49 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

I sure hope he does not lift that stay as that would open the doors to gay marriage and close the door on Walker’s decision to be overturned.


10 posted on 08/11/2010 10:32:18 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

He WAS politely asked to recuse himself but he declined saying he could render an unbiased opinion. Everyone in California KNEW what his ruling would be. The PEOPLE need to take back our country from people who are unelected, activist and arrogant.


11 posted on 08/11/2010 10:33:53 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R

thoth wormth are GAAAAAY!


12 posted on 08/11/2010 10:38:01 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Internal ethics panels, or if that fails, impeachment.


13 posted on 08/11/2010 10:39:37 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Who asked him to recuse himself?


14 posted on 08/11/2010 11:06:02 PM PDT by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

The USSC needs to step in an stop this activist fool. Walker needs to be slapped down by his superiors and taught a lesson. He is the quintessential rogue judge.


15 posted on 08/11/2010 11:06:54 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
People blame the judge but they forget it is the lawyering that convinces the judge or gives him/her cover. David Bois and Ted Olsen have been carefully laying the legal ground work for not only the stay to be lifted but for this judge to be upheld at the Supreme Court.
16 posted on 08/11/2010 11:08:28 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade; ILS21R; Sarah Barracuda; originalbuckeye

Psychology and Psychiatry would say the California gay marriage decision was entirely rational.

Judge Vaughn Walker overturned California’s Proposition 8, and found as fact that parent gender was insignificant for raising children, and thereby dismissed one of the arguments made in favor of the ban. This finding relies for foundational scientific credibility on the 1973 decision by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM).

Removal followed a two year campaign Newsweek described as ongoing disruptive, chaotic attacks on psychiatrists and physiologists. Yet throughout these attacks, no academic papers were presented at conferences refuting research previously done.

Eventually, the onslaughts forced sufficient abstentions and apprehensive responses for a third of APA’s 17,000 plus membership to approve removal. The under-voting and submission to public pressure support an understanding that the DSM is as likely to accumulate political manifestos and marketing brochures as attempts at scientific exposition.

After this decision a task force was established to ensure perpetual sanctity for the APA action. No research papers would again arise to confirm initial therapy success rates of 30% to 60 %, substantiating that 7 of 10 homosexuals could eventually walk away from the lifestyle forever. This task force would set peer review standards mandating pre-ordained theses, acceptable flexibility in research design definitions, and acceptable human data points. Psychology and Psychiatry chose to relinquish scientific rigor for popular societal and political acclaim.

Therefore, Judge Walker could safely reference any number of derivative studies, which find any arrangement of parent sexes provide the same benefit to children, and that any contrary opinion must constitute at least cultural prejudice.


17 posted on 08/11/2010 11:18:11 PM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

“Ahnold and Moonbeam both gave him cover.”
Ahnold is thinking of Hollywood future, and Moonbeam is thinking of Statehouse future, neither is thinking of US or California future. They both deserve the fate of Sodom and G ....


18 posted on 08/11/2010 11:46:49 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

Well put, my good FRiend.


19 posted on 08/11/2010 11:48:31 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

“The principal cause of child poverty in the U.S. is the absence of married fathers in the home,” Robert Rector, senior research fellow in domestic policy studies at The Heritage Foundation, writes in a new paper. “Marriage is a powerful weapon in fighting poverty. Being married has the same effect in reducing poverty as adding five to six years to a parent’s education level.”

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/06/Married-Fathers-Americas-Greatest-Weapon-Against-Child-Poverty?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell


20 posted on 08/11/2010 11:49:00 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

“Research shows that a child raised in a home where Dad is married to Mom is much less likely to live in poverty, get arrested as a juvenile, be suspended or expelled from school, be treated for emotional or behavioral problems, or drop out before completing high school. Taxpayers foot the bill for more than $300 billion a year in means-tested government spending on low-income single moms - and, in relatively rare cases, single dads.”

Same Heritage Foundation article.


21 posted on 08/11/2010 11:50:08 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1908243,00.html

6-19-09

And yet, studies of fatherlessness tell a different story. The National Center for Health Statistics has found that children living with divorced mothers are four times more likely to need professional treatment for emotional or behavioral problems, twice as likely to repeat a grade at school, and more likely to suffer chronic asthma, frequent headaches, bedwetting, stammering or speech defects, anxiety, depression or hyperactivity.

Children growing up without dads, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, are more likely to be delinquent and twice as likely to end up in prison.


22 posted on 08/11/2010 11:51:35 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

“Church attendance is good for the soul, but a new study by FRC shows that it’s also good for American schools. In a special edition of Dr. Pat Fagan’s Mapping America, Drs. Nicholas Zill and Philip Fletcher found a startling discrepancy between children who live with both biological parents and attend religious services weekly and those from broken homes who worship less frequently.

With data from the National Survey of Children’s Health, Zill and Fletcher found that students from intact, churchgoing families are five times less likely to repeat a grade. Less than a quarter of these parents (21%) were contacted by their child’s school for behavior or achievement problems, compared to 53 percent whose kids were not living with both parents and not attending church services regularly. There was even a noticeable difference in the level of parents’ stress. The more frequently a family worships together, the less anxiety moms and dads report about their kids’ school performance.

Perhaps even more surprising is that these differences held even after controlling for family income and poverty, parents’ education level, race, and ethnicity. As Mapping America illustrates, church and family are the perfect prescription for many social ills. Children thrive, the family bond strengthens, school success skyrockets, and the nation reaps the reward. As Dr. Fagan says, the intact married families who worship weekly are the greatest generator of human goods in the land. We encourage policy makers to strongly consider whether their proposals support such a family structure. It is to society’s advantage that they do.”


23 posted on 08/11/2010 11:53:28 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Thanks


24 posted on 08/11/2010 11:59:37 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

How constitutional is it for a single federal judge to throw out over 700,000 votes? Moreover, this legislation went through a litmus test of it constitutionality before it was even allowed to be brought up for a vote.

Bottom line is that obviously this judge did not like the law, and looked for some B.S. reason to through it out. Yeah this rat bum judge needs to be removed from his position.


25 posted on 08/12/2010 1:26:59 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

I went to church tonight and the sermon was from Matthew 13:1-23. Verses 13 through 15 are soooo applicable.


26 posted on 08/12/2010 2:12:21 AM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
Walker is completely in the pocket of homo-activist groups, he has no reason not to lift the ban. Forget the havoc it will cause if/when his decision is reversed, the law be damned.

I can't wait for Demoscum to be voted out of office. Then, maybe there will be a chance to expel this anus-lover.

27 posted on 08/12/2010 4:58:43 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kahonek

The defense. Notice I said politely. They did not ask for whatever legal order they would have needed. I suspect they didn’t figure it would work and it would have made the judge more prejudiced against them.


28 posted on 08/12/2010 5:34:00 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Interesting. Do you have a link? I thought the bit about his orientation didn’t come out publicly until the trial was well underway.


29 posted on 08/12/2010 5:43:32 AM PDT by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

He will lift the stay.

Legislatures, direct votes by the people, and the rule of law mean NOTHING in America today.

We are currently ruled by individuals in black robes and a federal bureaucracy. They are the the new Masters of Society.


30 posted on 08/12/2010 6:35:16 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kahonek

No, the facts about his “orientation” came out before the trial, and it made the homo-Nazi’s mouths water.


31 posted on 08/12/2010 8:53:01 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson