Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Myth of Technological Progress
Taki's Magazine ^ | August 30, 2009 | Scott Locklin

Posted on 08/12/2010 3:05:50 PM PDT by B-Chan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Age of Reason
Over 1000 sq ft per person is not stacking them like cordwood. Not with the entire rest of the land mass of the planet available when you gather everyone on the entire planet to Texas for a BBQ.

Ever been to Seoul? I have. People live there pretty well.

It's crowded, yes. But the landmass of the earth is very very large. And most of it is empty for miles. Hundreds and thousands of miles.

I take it you don't like math.

The earth and all that was on it was given to us to husband and steward. If we do that well, terra could support over 100 times the population we have now.

Be fruitful. Multiply.

/johnny

61 posted on 08/12/2010 8:21:13 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Guy completely missed biotech ... hell look at food production 1950 to 2010 .... THAT will astound anyone if they think about it.


62 posted on 08/12/2010 9:23:52 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Three things you don't discuss in public; politics, religion, and choice of caliber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
I know it is heresy to even mention around here, but imagine if everyone freely chose to live in spatious, well-made, sound-proofed, high-rise condos.

And the remaining land was left to farming, ranching, resource development and millions of acres of wildlife refuge.

If the Africans and the Indians are too damned poor to look after their lions and tigers and elephants, then why can't we?

And the liberals stupid enough to go into the refuge without the proper armaments would be duly recycled into the environment.

Win win.

63 posted on 08/12/2010 10:23:16 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (These fragments I have shored against my ruins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
Actually, he was right, given the nature of computers at the time.

I don't agree with your first sentence. To Watson, his prediction may have been logical, but he was totally wrong about the future of computing.

My point in telling this anecdote was that foretelling the future is fraught with folly, yet humans insist on littering half the news with speculation and predictions, most of which are utter garbage. (a) Why do we continue to do this? (b)Why do we believe these pundits and prophets? Probably the lure of fame, power or money....I can't see much else that would breed this behaviour or our willingness to listen.

Repeat after me....nobody knows what

64 posted on 08/13/2010 7:16:07 AM PDT by CanaGuy (Go Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: John Galt's cousin
Is her namesake still featured?

Magazine died in the 80s.

65 posted on 08/13/2010 10:22:13 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (The Obama magic is <strike>fading</strike>gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Over 1000 sq ft per person is not stacking them like cordwood.

That's only 40 people per acre. You could easily build small apartment buildings or condos to hold 40 on an acre with room to spare. Or put 80 per acre and leave an acre lot between, checkerboard style.

66 posted on 08/13/2010 10:26:16 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (The Obama magic is <strike>fading</strike>gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CanaGuy

nobody knows what


67 posted on 08/13/2010 10:56:41 AM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Not much food, B-Chan. Sounds like an essay of a sophomore who got a B- for his work.


68 posted on 08/13/2010 2:42:30 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Galt's cousin
I wonder what MiMi the Mechanix Illustrated girl looks like now


69 posted on 08/13/2010 3:55:15 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
This is by the "certain kind of right winger" I've mentioned before as agreeing in certain ways with the lefty anti-industrial environmentalists.

Taki needn't worry. If Obama gets his way (G-d forbid!) we'll all be living in caves soon enough.

70 posted on 08/13/2010 4:00:08 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Som tasim `aleykha melekh 'asher yivchar HaShem 'Eloqeykha bo . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I myself agree in certain ways with the lefty anti-industrial environmentalists. For example, I agree with them that raping the Earth for the sake of profit is not only stupid, but immoral.

"Conservative" and "Conservation" spring from the same Latin root: the Latin conservare, which means to actively preserve. I am not an environmentalist. I, like most of the conservatives of the past, believe that the natural environment is to be preserved and managed for the use of humans and for its own sake. This does not mean letting little kids die from malaria because DDT kills baby birds; it does mean using our reason and planning our cities and towns instead of just bulldozing the hell out of everything and paving it over.

71 posted on 08/13/2010 5:24:48 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson