Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

This ruling after the fact “unconstitutional” crap has happened multiple times regarding these initiatives in California now. I’ve never understood why the Constitutionality of initiatives wasn’t determined prior to the vote.

IN THIS CASE the Judge is a known homosexual, and should have recused himself, or his participation as the ruling Judge on the matter challenged due his known bias. I still believe something should be done regarding the Judge’s bias.

Yes I agree a straight Judge could be biased as well, but he/she wouldn’t be sitting there ruling with their hand on their crotch dreaming of that evening’s romp at the local bath house either.


38 posted on 08/13/2010 5:43:52 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, Call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rockinqsranch
I’ve never understood why the Constitutionality of initiatives wasn’t determined prior to the vote.

It was. By Jerry Brown, Ca. AG. Consider the the contempt shown to the people by a state AG actively moving to thwart the people and will not defend their legal interests. Jerry Brown is a communist bastard. One wonders if Meg Whitman "is a huge fan".

The state court later upheld Prop 8 as a valid amendment to the state Constitution. When push comes to shove, we see that we actually have a Ruling Class dictatorship, by and for the benefit of elitist, memebers-only Oberfuhrers.

75 posted on 08/13/2010 8:06:31 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson