Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LonelyCon

Two weeks ago, Dr. Taitz filed a motion to reconsider the sanction, When a review of the so-called “Denial” was done, it found that while the “Denial” was allegedly issued, there were no signatures of any Justices nor was there any evidence of the alleged order being logged into the Supreme Court records. This initial motion was addressed to Justice Alito. Then, consistent with Dr. Taitz right to re-file the motion to another Justice she filed it with Justice Thomas. Now, according to her blog, and I show the link here indicating there are still no official signatures from either Justice Alito, or Justice Thomas:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13078

The point here being, once again the “clerks” of the Supreme Court are in full charge of said court and the Justices are mere spectators and onlookers. I suggest the people who log onto this blog to disparage the work of Dr. Taitz without knowing all the FACTS, please rethink their line of reasoning.
Simply put, while there is some kind of evidence the two Justices involved supposedly rejected Dr. Taitz’ motion, there is no evidence either of them have even read the papers, let alone passed some kind of ruling.


28 posted on 08/16/2010 10:20:39 AM PDT by MODELSHIPS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MODELSHIPS
OR!

Taitz is a nutjob who hasn't a clue what she is doing and sees irrational conspiracy in everything she doesn't bother to try and understand.

There is that possibility...

65 posted on 08/16/2010 11:34:03 AM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: MODELSHIPS
The clerks again?

Setting aside the rank paranoia of that, people with the cumulative legal experience of Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito would need all of a thirty-second scan to recognize that Taitz is unhinged on this issue, doesn't have the slightest idea what she's doing, and hasn't filed a brief any court would take seriously. So why should they bother to read the whole thing? Courts get deranged ravings from incompetents on a semi-regular basis and summarily dismiss them.

309 posted on 08/27/2010 9:47:19 AM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson