Skip to comments.Ann Coulter: LOOK WHO'S 'NATIVIST' NOW! (Even SWEDEN doesn’t allow “Anchor Babies”)
Posted on 08/18/2010 2:06:34 PM PDT by Syncro
LOOK WHO'S 'NATIVIST' NOW!
August 18, 2010
"Nativism in American politics has become so rampant that it is considered scandalous in Republican circles for a judge to acknowledge paying any attention to foreign courts and their legal rulings." -- New York Times editorial, Aug. 3, 2010
The New York Times runs this same smug editorial every few months -- at least I think it's the same editorial -- to vent its spleen at conservatives who object to American judges relying on foreign law to interpret the U.S. Constitution.
But when it comes to anchor babies, The New York Times and the entire Democratic establishment plug their ears and hum rather than consider foreign laws on citizenship. (For more on this, see "Mexican immigration law versus U.S. immigration law.")
Needless to say, America is the only developed nation that allows illegal aliens to gain full citizenship for their children merely by dropping them on U.S. soil.
Take Sweden -- one of the left's favorite countries. Not only is there no birthright citizenship, but even the children of legal immigrants cannot become Swedish citizens simply by being born there. At least one parent must be a citizen for birth on Swedish soil to confer citizenship.
(Applicants also have to know the lyrics to at least one ABBA song, which explains why you don't see groups of Mexicans congregating outside Ikea stores.)
Liberals are constantly hectoring Americans to adopt Sweden's generous welfare policies without considering that one reason Sweden's welfare policies haven't bankrupted the country (yet) is that the Swedes don't grant citizenship to the children of any deadbeat who manages the spectacular feat of giving birth on Swedish soil.
In Britain, only birth to at least one British citizen or the highest class of legal immigrant, a "settled" resident with the right to remain, such as Irish citizens, confers citizenship on a child born in England. And if the British birthright is through the father, he must be married to the mother (probably a relic from Victorian times when marriage was considered an important institution).
Even Canada, the country most similar to the United States, grants citizenship upon birth -- but excludes the noncitizen parents of anchor babies from receiving benefits, such as medical care, schooling and other free stuff given to Canadian citizens.
For example, let's skip clitorectomies, arranged marriages, dropping walls on homosexuals, honor killings and the rest of the gorgeous tapestry of multiculturalism.
Read the rest at Ann Coulter.Com
"...Needless to say, America is the only developed nation that allows illegal aliens to gain full citizenship for their children merely by dropping them on U.S. soil.ZING!
Take Sweden -- one of the left's favorite countries.
Not only is there no birthright citizenship, but even the children of legal immigrants cannot become Swedish citizens simply by being born there.
At least one parent must be a citizen for birth on Swedish soil to confer citizenship.
(Applicants also have to know the lyrics to at least one ABBA song, which explains why you don't see groups of Mexicans congregating outside Ikea stores.)" -- Ann Coulter
Two can play at that game, to wit:
Globalism in American politics has become so rampant that it is considered scandalous in Demcrat circles for a judge to recognize that the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
That's a great cartoon, but I'm going to have to abuse the mods and have it removed...Too bad, although I understand his concern for online property rights.
Mike should be O.K. with us posting a LINK to his WEBSITE...
...with that wonderful "Throw out the Anchor (Baby)!" cartoon......right?
OK. Apologies, Mike. Tnx, RonDog, Mod
...The Times' editorial denouncing "nativist" conservatives ended with this little homily:KA-POW!"(Republicans) might want to re-read James Madison's description in the Federalist Papers of the ideal legislator: 'He ought not to be altogether ignorant of the law of nations.'"Of course, conservatives' objection to judges looking to foreign law is that they're judges, not legislators -- least of all "ideal legislators."
Judges are supposed to be interpreting a constitution and laws written by legislators, not legislating from the bench.
Hey, whose turn is it to remind The New York Times that the legislative branch of our government is different from the judicial branch? -- Ann Coulter
It just doesn't seem fair, Ann vs the New York Times. :o)
From an article by Lisa DePasquale called "Being Ann" (posted on townhall.com last year)And, speaking of "Ann being Ann" -- check out the lastest thread in the ongoing Ann @ homocon saga:
World Net Daily Shows Intolerance,
Boots Ann Coulter For Speaking At Conference for Gay Republicans
08/18/2010 12:15:24 PM PDT · by Amerisrael · 81 replies The Lid ^
"World Net Daily has decided to drop conservative pundit and author, Ann Coulter as the keynote speaker for WND's "Taking America Back National Conference" next month.
Because of her plan be the keynote speaker at "HOMOCON," an event put together by GOProud the first genuinely conservative group for gay Republicans."
"WND Editor Joseph Farah reports this exchange with Ms Coulter: 'Asked by Farah why she was speaking to GOProud, Coulter said:"They hired me to give a speech, so I'm giving a speech. I do it all the time..."
Ann getting in trouble for saying something controversial!Who woulda thunk it!
Wow, she still has the lab coat from when she helped Dr. Zoo out at the Intitute of Phenomonology!Not sure that you would call what Ann was wearing in that picture a "lab coat" (!) ...
...but here it is again, probably from the same photo shoot:
: > )
I can see right through her!
This email was sent to The Daily Caller from conservative pundit and author Ann Coulter in response to the announcement that WorldNetDaily editor Joseph Farah had dropped her as a speaker for an upcoming event.RonDog's note to WND: Don't piss off The Blonde One.
The email, which Coulter prefaced was written in a rush reads as follows:1) farah is doing this for PUBLICITY and publicity alone;
2) this was an email exchange btwn friends and even though I didnt expressly say OFF THE RECORD and I believe everything I said,
hes a swine for using my private emails politely answering him.
why would he do such a despicable thing? for PUBLICITY.
3) but now that he has, I will say that he could give less than two sh-ts about the conservative movement as demonstrated by his promotion of the birther nonsense (long ago disproved by my newspaper, human events, also sweetness & light, american spectator and national review etc, etc etc).
Hes the only allegedly serious conservative pushing the birther thing. for ONE reason: to get hits on his website.
4) his group hadnt come up for the money to book me for a speech, anyway, so hes not canceling me from anything.
also, FYI; my fellow evangelicals and I know lots and lots of em all think its great that Im doing this.
(of course, they know Im not changing my mind on gay marriage even though I like gays.)
this is total b.s. for PUBLICITY by a publicity whore. Attack ann coulter, get publicity. liberals figured that out a long time ago, so hes a little late to the party.
Sweetness and Light disproved the birth certificate issue?
Does anyone have a link to that?
Sweetness and Light disproved the birth certificate issue?LOL!
Does anyone have a link to that?
I can only work one project at a time!Right now, I'm defending Ann's "gay outreach" program. :o)
Someone ELSE is going to have to defend her position on our "undocumented" Commander-in-Chief. ;)
ZING!! Good one.
I’m sorry, I should have put that to “all” instead of just you.
Hey, whose turn is it to remind The New York Times that the legislative branch of our government is different from the judicial branch?
Alright, I'll do it this week, Ann, but I expect a personally autographed book in exchange. You can FReepmail me for an address. :)
Let me know if you'd like to be added to the Ann Coulter ping list.
Hey, whose turn is it to remind The New York Times that the legislative branch of our government is different from the judicial branch? - AnnYou want a personally autographed copy of Ann's NEW book?
Alright, I'll do it this week, Ann, but I expect a personally autographed book in exchange. - jellybean
I thought that was supposed to be a SECRET! ;)
(I'll remind the the NYT next week about their misconstruations)
I already have all her other books! :)
I thought that was supposed to be a SECRET! ;)
Not anymore! LOL
She's always in the process of writing a new book. It's been a while, so a new one must be due soon. :)
Oh, thank goodness!! I don't want to be the only one wading into that swamp every week! :)
This looks like a good article for the
AFIRE ping list
LOL. Oh that. Yes, I noticed.
Coulter for SCOTUS.
Impossible! She speaks to homosexuals!! Burn her!
One of the reasons she belongs on SCOTUS!
She will have to speak to Kagan...LOL.
LOL @ Monty Python link.
Good night, I gotta get outta here.
Watching Red Eye.
Perhaps speaking at HOMOCON is just practice then.
I love Red Eye! I haven't been able to watch it since Fox had all the live streams removed. :(
Oh heck, you can’t watch it. Yeah, Red Eye is “grate” but it keeps me up very late. It’s over now. G’ Nite!
I’d much rather piss off the blonde than God.
Ann is a hypocritical christian at best if she thinks it’s OK to accept GOProud’s money - as if that is not somehow providing additional inroads for homosexuality.
Not too mention how blatantly wrong she is on the birther issue. From my viewpoint she is the one going head over heels for the money. Apparently she has abondoned the prinicple of ‘consider the source’...
Apparently she has abondoned the prinicple of consider the source...Perhaps.
Or, she may be following a HIGHER calling...
...the one about "going into ALL the world."Getting paid to go does't necessarily invalidate the concept that the SICK are more in need of a doctor than are the HEALTHY.
Perhaps Ann can see something worth salvaging in this group.......and prefers attempting to make some kind of an impact among the sinners, to preaching to the choir. :o)
Hearing the call of a Higher Calling requires that one make distinctions and discriminations in whom one is associated - esp. when accepting their money.
There is nothing the true conservative can identify with in GOProud let alone one who claims to be a christian.
AND PLEASE Let’s not confuse Ann’s political message with evangelizing the lost. The closest Ann has gotten to evangelizing is her comment on coverting them or killing them (much more inline here w/ islamic culture rather than christian culture).
AND PLEASE Lets not confuse Anns political message with evangelizing the lost.As I posted on the OTHER thread -- to someone who was also apparently aware of what Ann has written more recently than 9/12/2001:
The closest Ann has gotten to evangelizing is her comment on coverting them or killing them (much more inline here w/ islamic culture rather than christian culture).
-- snip --
I have an unfair advantage, having actually READ almost all of Ann's columns. :o)Try THIS one:
IF YOU CAN FIND A BETTER DEAL, TAKE IT!I have rarely seen ANYONE (in or outside of the traditional "four walls" of the church) deliver the Great Commission as powerfully as Ann did in this one (nominally POLITICAL) column.
(January 6, 2010)
The whole thing is GREAT (and relatively short) -- and it ends, wonderfully, this way:
-- snip --ANYONE that "preaches the Word" so eloquently gets a LOT of grace from me...
...You can be washing the dishes or walking your dog or just sitting there minding your business hating Susan Sarandon and accept that God sent his only son to die for your sins and rise from the dead ... and you're in!
"Because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved." Romans 10:9.
If you do that, every rotten, sinful thing you've ever done is gone from you. You're every bit as much a Christian as the pope or Billy Graham.
No fine print, no "your mileage may vary," no blackout dates. God ought to do a TV spot: "I'm God Almighty, and if you can find a better deal than the one I'm offering, take it."
The Gospel makes this point approximately 1,000 times. Here are a few examples at random:
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." John 3:16.
"For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God." Ephesians 2:8.
"For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." Romans 6:23.
In a boiling rage, liberals constantly accuse Christians of being "judgmental." No, we're relieved.
Christianity is also the hardest religion in the world because, if you believe Christ died for your sins and rose from the dead, you have no choice but to give your life entirely over to Him.
No more sexual promiscuity, no lying, no cheating, no stealing, no killing inconvenient old people or unborn babies -- no doing what all the other kids do.
And no more caring what the world thinks of you -- because, as Jesus warned in a prophecy constantly fulfilled by liberals: The world will hate you.
With Christianity, your sins are forgiven, the slate is wiped clean and your eternal life is guaranteed through nothing you did yourself, even though you don't deserve it. It's the best deal in the universe.COPYRIGHT 2009 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106
...even if I do not always understand (or agree with) EVERYTHING that she says and does.
Not too mention how blatantly wrong she is on the birther issue.You may be right about THIS one. :o)
I prefer to see Ann's distancing herself from this important issue as a matter of priority.Why attack Obama, she seems to be saying, in a way that gives us even the APPEARANCE of loon-acy...
...when there are so many OTHER (more "traditional") issues where he is vulnerable.
Good post and I agree w/ most all of it. BTW I do tend to read Ann Coulter 99% of the time and always appreciate anyone anywhere willing to present the true gospel message.
The problem is you can not have your cake and eat it too. If you are a christian you must be in the world but not of the world. You must not love worldly ways and the filhty lucre associated with worldly ways. You must be like a ship at sea - willing to sail anywhere the wind (Holy Spirit) takes you w/o allowing the water (world/sin) to enter into your boat and eventually sinking it.
Any christian can lose his voice (power of evangelizing) through hypocrisy, thru trying to emulate world, thru willingly erasing distinctions and discriminations against sin, thru accepting the idea of ‘when in Rome do as the Romans do’, OR basically thru compromising and rationalizing (rationing lies).
The best way to sum it all up is the quote ‘to preach the Word to all the world and when necessary even use words.’
I don’t recall reading that particular AC column, but ‘hating Susan Sarandon’? - what happened to love the sinner / hate the sin? What happens to not taking God seriously and literally at His Word regarding forgiveness. I think the problem is we all too often enjoy AC taking revenge on the left - misaligning who the true enemy is - the enemy is not my brother or sister - the enemy is the devil/satan/lucifer - the father of all lies, spiritiual stronholds set against the Will and Word and Love of God.
The other problem for most christians is in failing in discernment, distinction and discrimination. God declares that only He sees and knows the truth in the heart of every believer yet all too often we want to be associated w/ the ‘higher ups’ - the Popes, Billy Graham, etc. - this is pride and pride is sin. Sin is selfishness and sooner or later pride speaks to selfishness claiming a little cake for the here and now rather than waiting for the great wedding feast ushering in God’s Kingdom and Rule - when our chains will be broken completely.
Basically I think AC needs to mature a lot before she continues to try to be a ‘christian leader’ - but then we all do, we all fall short. I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy in the current news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.