Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More documents refused to be entered by another Supreme Court "Clerk"
August 21, 2010 | MODELSHIPS

Posted on 08/21/2010 10:18:14 AM PDT by MODELSHIPS

This is an excerpt from Dr. Taitz blog, August 21, 2010. The link to the PDF document to which she refers is below the excerpt:

More info on the Supreme Court clerks

Posted on | August 21, 2010 | No Comments

To: undisclosed-recipients:; Subject: U.S. Supreme Court Clerk: Letters to Justices have been “thrown away” | Letter to the Editor | @ The Post & Email

U.S. Supreme Court Clerk: Letters toJustices have been “thrown away” | Letter to the Editor | @ The Post& Emailhttp://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/19/u-s-supreme-court-clerk-letters-to-justices-have-been-thrown-away/

Previously I submitted a case to the Supreme court “Easterling et al v Obama et al”. This was a case, where I asked for a leave of court to file under the original jurisdictionof the Supreme Court a writ of Mandamus for the ambassadors of different countries to provide information on citizenship and entrance visas for Barack Hussein obama or Barry Soetoro. When the case is against theambassadors of other countries, there is an original jurisdiction in the Supremwe court. a clrk for the original jurisdictions, Cynthia Rapp, refused to file the pleadings, even though it was from a 100 members of US military, goping up to Major General.

A, supporter of mine, Brigadier General of the air force, called the chief clerk William Sutter, and complained, yet nothing was done. this clerk had no right to refuse the filing, yet she did it.

I, personally, travelled to Moscow, Idaho, and complained to Chief Justice Roberts. On camera, in front of some 1000 people in the audience and hundreds of people watching in other locations he promised to review my papers. Over a year passed by, yet he did nothing, I never heard back from him.

snip

The additional document in PDF link:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13238


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: obama; scotus; scotus4dnc; scotus4obama; scotuscorruption; taitz
It appears that the "General Order of the Day" in this "less than esteemed Supreme Court" is carved in stone when it comes to avoiding, at all costs, the action of hearing "We the People".
1 posted on 08/21/2010 10:18:16 AM PDT by MODELSHIPS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS

Under the boot heel of the most corrupt administration in our long esteemed history, who can be surprised at these revelations!


2 posted on 08/21/2010 10:26:22 AM PDT by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS
there is an original jurisdiction in the Supremwe court. a clrk for the original jurisdictions

Maybe if she tried the Supreme Court, rather than the Supremwe court....

3 posted on 08/21/2010 10:36:43 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS

That posting is rife with misspellings. Is it real?


4 posted on 08/21/2010 10:52:24 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS

It just kills me.
I am not a “birther”. I believe that Obama was born in Hawaii because I believe innocent until proven guilty.

That being said, I just want to know WTH this man has to hide because NONE of his records are available.


5 posted on 08/21/2010 11:02:10 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

I excerpted the page as it was written..... she, being from another country has some “issues” from time to time with the English language. I felt it was more desirable to respect the tenor of her email and leave the grammar and mispellings as they are. In any case, the sum and substance doesn’t change with a few spelling errors....the salient point here is that the less than “illustrious Court” is, indeed under the direct supervision and control of the “Alleged Clerks”


6 posted on 08/21/2010 11:08:50 AM PDT by MODELSHIPS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS

My sympathies are with her in her work, but hasn’t she gotten into trouble with so-called “frivolou” suits? That would seem to put a damper on her rep with the courts.


7 posted on 08/21/2010 11:11:31 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS
A peasant, especially a white peasant *woman*, has to right to demand anything of His Half Darkness.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

8 posted on 08/21/2010 11:23:11 AM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS

Whatever the case may be regarding all this birth issue, the facts need to be openly heard and stand or fall on their merits at some point. It does seem courts are ducking the issue (even Roberts apparently), but imagine the disaster that will come if sometime AO (After Obama), we learn that he was not eligible and the courts, fearing what they may find, simply chose to ignore a difficult subject.


9 posted on 08/21/2010 11:24:09 AM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS
World's Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site

No lack of hubris on her part is there?

10 posted on 08/21/2010 11:26:20 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

I believe the word “frivolous” is in the eye of the beholder, especially when the said beholder is a corrupt judge. All I’ve seen so far are allegations as to “frivolous”, by less than veracious jurists. A monetary sanction does not qualify as a legitimate remedy to assess sanctions, monetary or otherwise. I place the word “frivolous” up there with “lack of standing” as used by alleged judges. Far less than credible in our real world.


11 posted on 08/21/2010 11:27:44 AM PDT by MODELSHIPS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS
When the case is against theambassadors of other countries, there is an original jurisdiction in the Supremwe court. a clrk for the original jurisdictions, Cynthia Rapp, refused to file the pleadings, even though it was from a 100 members of US military, goping up to Major General.

Her typos or your's? Just curious.

12 posted on 08/21/2010 11:28:59 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS
I believe the word “frivolous” is in the eye of the beholder, especially when the said beholder is a corrupt judge.

Anyone who has followed Orly Taitz and who has read her moronic legal filings and who have watched her demonstrate an almost complete ignorance of judicial processes would not find it at all sinister that Supreme Court clerks tossed her cases into the nearest circular file. These people are not law school instructors. They are not there to hand-hold the Birther Queen through the system. If documents are filed incorrectly or with errors then they get tossed, end of story. And that's almost certainly what happened here.

13 posted on 08/21/2010 11:35:05 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS

too much writ of Mandamus


14 posted on 08/21/2010 11:38:35 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS

OK. I was just saying that there are possible reason(s).


15 posted on 08/21/2010 11:42:03 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS
If you read the .pdf file that Taitz links to on her website you will see that Easterling v Obama was filed 14 months ago. Here is a Link explaining why the Supreme Court clerks did not accept the case in the first place. Taitz did not respond to their requests for clarification - if she had then she would no doubt have included that paperwork on her website - and after due time they dropped the case entirely into the trash. As this Link apparently details.

Orly Taitz is an idiot. An apparently self-promoting idiot, but an idiot nevertheless.

16 posted on 08/21/2010 11:49:15 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rj45mis

“Under the boot heel of the most corrupt administration in our long esteemed history, who can be surprised at these revelations!”

It is worth noting that Roberts was not appointed by this administration. George W. Bush, a globalist, appointed Roberts.

I don’t really know how to figure all of this out when it comes to the Traitz challenges to Obama’s citizenship. Citizen or not, he is doing his best to destroy this country.

I do know that the members of the Supreme Court are not in a bubble. There is no way in hell that a clerk refusing to file a motion would not be known to them.


17 posted on 08/21/2010 12:04:31 PM PDT by SkipW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
I just want to know WTH this man has to hide because NONE of his records are available.

That, my dear, makes you a birther.
18 posted on 08/21/2010 12:27:28 PM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MODELSHIPS

Good heavens man.

Do you try to be ignorant about these things?

Courts have rules for submission of evidence and opinion.

Abiding by these rules doesn’t suddenly become a bad thing just because you are personally unhappy about it.


19 posted on 08/21/2010 1:33:33 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

>>That, my dear, makes you a birther. <<

Why?
If anything I would be a “recorder”. If all the other records were there, I wouldn’t care if we saw a BC.


20 posted on 08/21/2010 4:43:48 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

And I can’t read her name without thinking of the O rly? Owl.


21 posted on 08/21/2010 4:45:19 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Photobucket
22 posted on 08/21/2010 5:50:37 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

That’s the one!


23 posted on 08/21/2010 7:51:05 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Re: If all the other records were there, I wouldn’t care if we saw a BC.

That's a pretty big "if," isn't it.

This is a recorder:



You're a birther -- like it or not.

24 posted on 08/24/2010 6:16:49 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

I am convinced that Orly Taitz is an Obama false flag operation. Her misspellings, tortured grammar, and her lack of understanding of the law have poisoned the well and established precedents in her losses that make it impossible for qualified attorneys to pursue legitimate questions about Obama’s eligibility.

Not one conservative constitutional attorney who has ever actually argued a case before the US Supreme Court has taken on any of the Obama eligibility lawsuits.

Here’s what a conservative Chief US Federal District Court Judge appointed by Ronald Reagan had to say about Orly Taitz: “This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution (See US Const. Art. II, Sect. 1). This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”—Chief US Federal District Court for the District of Columbia Royce C. Lamberth in dismissing the quo warranto claim in Taitz v Obama, April 14, 2010.


25 posted on 08/28/2010 9:20:44 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson