Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain's $21 million campaign (against conservatives, Tea Party)
The Washington Post ^ | 2010-08-23 | Chris Cillizza

Posted on 08/23/2010 5:43:11 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

Sen. John McCain has raised and spent better than $21 million in advance of tomorrow's primary fight against former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, a massive amount of money that has helped to ensure that the Arizona Republican will win easily.

McCain's eye-popping spending -- putting aside self-funders he has spent the most money of any Senate candidate this cycle --is the most obvious evidence of the threat that the 2008 Republican presidential nominee perceived in Hayworth -- a six term Congressman who lost a re-election bid in 2006.

McCain spent millions (and millions) on television ads aimed at blocking Hayworth from becoming a national symbol of the conservative cleansing that many within the party believed to be necessary.

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: amnesty; arizona; election2010; fmccain; gojdgo; hayworth; jd; jdhayworth; juanmccain; mccain; mcinsane; mclame; mcliberal; mcpain; mcrino; rino; senatorjdhayworth; thanksrinos; winjdwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: rabscuttle385

I can understand why people don’t like McCain...but can’t really figure out why they would support J.D. Hayworth as an alternative. Among other things, Hayworth recently said he was glad Obama won the presidential election - that’s hardly conservative.


21 posted on 08/23/2010 7:10:33 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suz in AZ

Definitely hope Kelly wins. Have you seen any polls on that race?


22 posted on 08/23/2010 7:11:59 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Hayworth recently said he was glad Obama won the presidential election

No, what he actually said was that a McCain presidency would have been worse than an Obama presidency.

And he was dead on right about that.

McCain in charge would be a Democrat wet dream.

23 posted on 08/23/2010 7:12:03 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

....all that money he didn’t use against Obama. :(:(:(


24 posted on 08/23/2010 7:13:36 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

I haven’t really seen any polls for AZ-8, although I was called for one wanting to know if “scandals” would make me think less of Kelly or Paton. I asked, “So where is the question about Giffords??”

Anywhoo... got talking to the pollster and asked how things were looking and he said that it’s not looking good at all for the Dems. Said that he polls all over the country and even Dem strongholds are really weak. Said that people are really upset.

So... we shall see. From the emails I get from both sides, Paton seems to be the more desperate of the two. And I am sure that the McCain robocall won’t help.


25 posted on 08/23/2010 7:18:21 PM PDT by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
The Gelding Old Pantywastes are DEAD as a party if McLIBERAL returns in 2011 to DC. AZ can win one for the Gipper. Stay thirsty my friends ...
26 posted on 08/23/2010 7:19:05 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Hayworth was taken out of context. He’s saying essentially the same thing that others are saying, that McCain would have taken us down a similar road, but more slowly and there would not be the awakening that we have had today. People are on fire now. That may have never happened with McCain. People could still be asleep and we would not be looking at the November tsunami ahead. Better off with Obama and the reawakening.


27 posted on 08/23/2010 7:22:34 PM PDT by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Suz in AZ

Perhaps...although those two Supreme Court seats that Obama got to pick were pretty significant bad things that can’t be corrected. I doubt McCain would have appointed Scalia types, but even if they were in the O’Connor or Kennedy molds that would have significantly shifted the Court to the right given the justices that were replaced.


28 posted on 08/23/2010 7:26:22 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

I don’t know. I’m not convinced his picks would be much better. And then there would be Congress, merrily doing their thing, while the country is asleep. So then, which is the least of the two evils?


29 posted on 08/23/2010 7:29:23 PM PDT by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Suz in AZ

It’s one of those things...we can never know what “could” have happened...but what will happen is another matter.


30 posted on 08/23/2010 7:30:39 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
he will return to his old ways once the election is over

There is absolutely no doubt about that, and either Arizona is ignorant or Arizona doesn't care.

31 posted on 08/23/2010 7:32:41 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins

It is amazing to me the voters believe his shtick! Either that or they don’t like JD for some reason.


32 posted on 08/23/2010 7:43:46 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Amen. Must be vigilant.


33 posted on 08/23/2010 7:55:29 PM PDT by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

McCain kept McShifting and McShafting conservatives for most of his career. His legislative record is less of a McHero and more of a McCaca.


34 posted on 08/23/2010 7:56:18 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Perhaps...although those two Supreme Court seats that Obama got to pick

It's very unlikely those two particular justices would have retired if McCain had won. We saw how Souter, the stealth appointment of GHWB, waited out eight years of W to retire during the first half-year of Obama's administration.

35 posted on 08/23/2010 8:25:57 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Will88

With Souter probably so...but maybe not John Paul Stevens...he’s 90, isn’t he?


36 posted on 08/23/2010 8:30:58 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
With Souter probably so...but maybe not John Paul Stevens...he’s 90, isn’t he?

I don't know, Stevens stayed for a year and a-half of Obama, if McCain had won he might have decided to stay four more years, or as long as he was able.

37 posted on 08/23/2010 8:36:01 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

ASSHOLE MCCAIN (And don’t Bleep out the cuss words on this one)!

He really is the way he didn’t fight Obama, but Has J.D! ASSHOLE; that’s what he is, and that is what anyone who supported him in this race IS!


38 posted on 08/23/2010 8:44:15 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

A poll released today by the Chamber of Commerce has Kelly up by 11 percent. Go Jesse!


39 posted on 08/23/2010 9:10:12 PM PDT by CanadianYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I agree, Itis abysmal, he fights ONLY against conservatives ... he NEVER fought this hard against Obama and was in effect a key reason Obama got the big win he did, a better candidate could have beaten him.

WHY DIDNT MCCAIN GO ALL OUT AGAINST OBAMA LIKE HE IS AGAINST JD?

Simple reason - he hates conservatives more than he hates leftists.

And one more thing - NEVER nominate someone who wont quit their current post. LAZY campaigners do that.


40 posted on 08/23/2010 9:21:12 PM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson