Skip to comments.No Surprise Holder Behind Suspension of USS Cole Bomber Case
Posted on 08/31/2010 2:50:23 PM PDT by devane617
There should be no surprise that the Obama administration and Attorney General Eric Holder would put terrorists rights before their victims and the safety of the American people by suspending the trial of Abd al Rahim al Nashiri, mastermind of the USS Cole attack.
Holder and the Clinton administration have pandered to terrorists for political gain before.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigpeace.com ...
Is Holder a Moose Limb?
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
The Traitor in Chief and his right-hand man.
Whites with whom he disagrees, he burns alive.
Holder must be an enemy agent. The Crats are in meltdown mode.
Eric Holder swore a Constitutional Oath to apply the existing laws of the land.
But he won’t apply the law to the Black Panthers.
He won’t apply the law to the Cole Bomber.
And he won’t apply the law to illegal immigrants.
He is violating the oath he promised to uphold.
Time to go, you backstabbing liar.
Make that January when we get at least one branch of government back in American hands.
The Cole was bombed when Clinton was in office. If it was such a slam-dunk then why didn’t Bush put them on trial? Why did we wait until these yahoos took over?
The Dims in Congress know they are in melt-down, but they seem to diving off the bridge with the Executive branch. I am amazed that they are so blatantly open with their deeds. It’s like they have a suicide pact. the ony way to stop the change is to stop the November election...
Like Kamikazis in the final plunge.
But, why? Something doesn't make sense...
Alinski rules for radicals does not work when you are in charge. They are just trying to rob and steal as much as they can before they are ousted in January.
SCOTUS and Congress (John McCain, in particular) had "a better idea".
Should GWB have run roughshod over the SCOTUS and Congress (and MCain)? Yes.
But, being in search of "a new tone in Washington", he didn't.
Moral: Never trust Democrats. Or John McCain.
Holder acts pretty much independent of Congress. We need protection for LOOOOONG past November.
I think the truth is that they have set up a judicial system they know will reveal our security secrets and ultimately fail to result in convictions.
It was great fun when Bush was in office but now that they own it and the consequences they are perplexed how they are going to get out of the box they built.
“But, why? Something doesn’t make sense... “
Because Communists and Islamists do not think in the NOW. They think in terms of the future.
If Obama can further the lefts goals just a bit, they are that much closer to global tyranny against liberty. For every one area where Obama moved the sticks, we have to move it back two.
And who is behind Holder?
Okay, Treason is still punishable by hanging right?
The real idiots is the GOP senators who voted to confirm this joker knowing full well he had represented terrorists at GITMO......... and knowing his previous history at justice under Clinton. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me........ shame is on the Senators... like McCain, etc., who supported him.
>Eric Holder swore a Constitutional Oath to apply the existing laws of the land.<
Hmmm. Are members of the Obama administration held accountable under the same laws that previous administration were?
“The real idiots is the GOP senators who voted to confirm this joker knowing full well he had represented terrorists at GITMO”
Flush the Grand Old Potty. Vote Conservative.
>Moral: Never trust Democrats. Or John McCain.<
Y’all in AZ, are you listening?
I think the Dems had a majority on the nomination committee, since the had a majority in the Senate .... so even if every Republican had voted against, Holder still would’ve gotten thru.
That’s why we need November to change things.
Holder was involved with the murder/incineration of innocent Americans at Waco?
IF the GOP had placed a hold on his nomination they could have derailed it, same as they did a few others.
“The Traitor in Chief and his right-hand man”
Spot on. Reminds me of Hitler and Himmler.
Holder indicts the American Public as a “nation of cowards” yet spends an inordinate amount of his business day wringing his hands over the venues of a handfull of terrorist trials and terrorist’s rights issues. He should resign so that perhaps someone could do the work that he seems too incompetent to handle.
Be a little more culturally sensitive. Islamic nutcases need "religiously" to blow giant holes in American naval ships and to kill 17 innocent sailors. It's sorta like hanging Christmas stockings in Jihadworld.
Good question. Why didn’t Bush’s administration put them on trial?
“But, why? Something doesn’t make sense...”
It does if you believe we are in the end times. Remember that at some point in time God himself begins to bring about the events that will lead up to the tribulation.
That’s the only logical conclusion I can come up with any more. Any thing else just doesn’t make any sense.
According the the DoJ you are displaying signs of being a terrorist or criminal extremist.
Gun Owners of America (GOA) is described as "extremely radical" in Department of Justice document (FR thread)
"Investigating Terrorism and Criminal Extremism - Terms and Concepts (DoJ document, pdf)
Oath of Office: An oath public officials take that patriots claim binds them to the patriots view of duty. Perhaps the most common charge leveled by antigovernment extremists is that their public officials are violating oaths of office if they enforce an unpopular law, rule, or regulation.
this administration is not your friend
Why isn’t this headline news?
Holder is a traitor if there ever was one. Why is he not in jail? When are we going to call for his head.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.