Posted on 09/03/2010 3:36:10 AM PDT by SkyPilot
Bethany Storro was wheeled into a small conference room with her face wrapped in bandages. Her parents on either side of her, she shoved aside the moments when shes asked, Why me? and instead struck a thankful tone.
Im just trying to stay positive, she said. Its not about looks. I cant let what she did to me ruin my life.
From the looks of things Thursday, she wont. The bandages covered her face but were no match for her easy-going disposition and sharp wit.
Im generally a happy person everyones just been so nice to me, she said.
Storro spoke for about 30 minutes in a room at the Oregon Burn Center at Legacy Emanuel Medical Center in Portland, where shes receiving medicine to fight off pain and treatment to generate fresh skin.
__________________________________________________
Storro described her attacker as pretty, and said she thinks she had three piercings at the top of her left ear.
She said the woman was black, wore no makeup, and had black hair pulled into a ponytail. Storro said the woman was approximately 5 feet 8 inches tall. She was wearing a green top and khaki shorts.
(Excerpt) Read more at columbian.com ...


A Christian, Storro returned throughout the half-hour to her profound belief that God is watching over her.
She points to the sunglasses credited with saving her eyesight that she bought 20 minutes before the incident as a sign of divine presence.
For some reason, I had this feeling I needed to buy sunglasses, Storro said. Thats Jesus, for sure.
The Vancouver Police Department released this composite drawing of a woman suspected in an Aug. 30 acid-throwing attack on Bethany Storro of Vancouver. Storro described her assailant as black, with black hair pulled into a ponytail. She was approximately 5 feet 8 inches tall. She was wearing a green top and khaki shorts.
Of course it is not a hate crime, the victim is a whitey and the perp allegedly is not.
Of course it is a hate crime and someone knows who this woman is.
If throwing acid in someoens face isn’t a hate crime, nothing is.
I wonder if whites will ever wake up? Oh that’s right it would be racist to wake up.
It was a love crime. See, the perp did it because she loved the ideology that provided the basis for this seemingly random act of love.
Why, even flying airplanes into skyscrapers, killing thousands, is a love crime. The MoHamHeads that did it were just expressing their love for their desert moon god, allah, by killing thousands of infidels and themselves as human sacrifices to their malevolent pagan desert idol.
Praise Jesus! For those who don't believe in miracles - there's one right there. You can see the outline on her face where she was wearing the glasses.
If it can be shown that the reason for the attack was race, then it should be prosecuted as a hate crime, if they have such a law in Washington state. Otherwise not.

Black? Terrorist? Acid thrower? Attack voters? We've got your back.
there MUST be pics of this animal on video in the area....everyone has a camera anymore.....
“Hate Crime” is a deconstructionist term, invented by the Left. We should refrain from using it.
It is a redundancy, as an assault is a hateful act by definition. To define assaults as acts of hate is redundant. The Left creates terminology like this (deconstructionism) to create strawmen for their shrill bleating.
Well stated. We should only use the term “hate-crime” sarcastically, to point out the hypocrisy of the left.
> We should only use the term hate-crime sarcastically,
> to point out the hypocrisy of the left.
And to ridicule it!
Ridicule is a powerful tactic. Let’s use it!
I don't know what that means, except that I think the word "deconstructionist" was invented by the left.
It is a redundancy, as an assault is a hateful act by definition.
They probably should use some word other that "hate" to describe it, but the idea is not redundant. Some crimes are motivated specifically by racial hatred. Some are not. There is a difference.
It may be a societal benefit to crack down on particular types of crimes. On the other hand, it's probably a slippery leftist slope to criminalize thought.
> On the other hand, it’s probably a slippery leftist slope
> to criminalize thought.
Thank you.
You said it better than I could.
True sarcasm and more effective is to say, “Love crime” in a sneering tone. If someone comments just tell them that is to distinguish it from a “Hate crime”, they’ll get the message.
Of course it`s not a hate crime. The perp has skin of color. Only whitey is guilty of hate crimes.
Since the perp has skin of color, DU is ignoring this crime.
The face of racism in the modern world.
....so when is something a hate crime?
How hard would it be to track down a black woman with 3 dramatic piercings in one ear who looks like a space alien? Oh, but it would be bad to snitch!
Notice the sketch is a politically-correct image of a black woman that doesn’t really look black (white skin, thin elegant nose, etc.)?
Acid attacks are a common occurrence in among the Taliban to punish women.
Was she wearing anything that could identify her as Christian. Was she speaking about her religion aloud?
The criminal in the drawing looks a bit like a caricature of a space alien - or someone from the future.
Perhaps we should say attacks by blacks on whites are love crimes, since they are the opposite of hate crimes? LOL.
That was done many years ago when we first acknowledged the difference between Murder and Self Defense, as well as further classifying homicides as Murder, Justifiable, accidental, and then further with varying degrees of manslaughter.
All are based on intent/state of mind.
Many blacks have light skin and European features due to having whites as well as blacks in their ancestry.
On Jane;Valez Mitchell’s show Issues, guest host Carlos somebody and the panel agonized over what might be the motive. At no time was a description of the assailant given. (It would have made a big difference it it was an elderly woman in Amish dress; a tattooed Hispanic; or fat woman). They stated that it was somebody with mental issues and one person suggested it might be gang initiation (not likely if it was somebody over 70). Finally it was labeled as part of the “war on women.” It sounded so stupid.
Vancouver police to say acid attack a hoax, source says--(Confirmed by VPD it was self inflicted)
“Of course it`s not a hate crime. The perp has skin of color. Only whitey is guilty of hate crimes.”
That’s right. Only sick Racist Pigs like this woman in Vancouver, Susan Smith and that crazy woman in Pittsburgh that carved a “B” on her face can be guilty of a hate crime.
Each killed her children or maimed themselves and blamed it on a black perp.
This woman in Vancouver should be left to rot in a cage with Susan Smith.
“I wonder if whites will ever wake up?”
Wake up to what?
Oh, you mean wake-up to the fact that there are whites that are so racist that they maim themselves and blame it on a black person?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.